journal article·2016-05

A New Method of Critical Failure Monitoring for the Heterogeneity Material Friction Welding Specimens Applying Multiple Physical Signals

Zhang Yubo, Xu Binshi, Wang Haidou, He Pengfei, Xing Zhiguo

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Fatigue fracture is a common failure mode for dissimilar materials friction welded components. To reduce the major accidents caused by sudden fracture of friction welded parts, the present paper discussed the feasibility of the combined usage of electric resistance (ER), infrared thermograph (IRT) and acoustic emission (AE) to monitor the critical fatigue damage from the perspectives of energy dissipation and micro defects evolution. The study found that three kinds of signal could be acquired synchronously. They are non-interfering and mutual support. After entering the critical fracture stage, there exists a good mapping relationship between ER and the AE amplitude and energy for the specimens of abnormal and normal fracture. They all can be regarded as the parameters of monitoring critical failure. Although IRT is usually used to predict the fatigue limit of materials, the rapid temperature rising stage may not always be obvious near the fracture. Compared with the single signal monitoring, multi-information fusion has the higher credibility, which is beneficial to increase the service safety and reliability of friction welding parts.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Madhusudhan · Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J] · 2012 · 212 · 6610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.08.005 ↗
2. Vishwanath · International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology[J] · 2014 · 3 · 57210.15623/ijret.2014.0315107 ↗
3. Charles · Experimental Mechanics[J] · 1975 · 15 · 13310.1007/BF02318849 ↗
4. Bagavathiappan · Infrared Physics & Technology[J] · 2013 · 60 · 55
5. Kordatos · Mechanics Research Communications[J] · 2013 · 54 · 1410.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.09.005 ↗
6. Amiri · International Journal of Fatigue[J] · 2010 · 32 · 38210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.07.015 ↗
7. Rosa · International Journal of Fatigue[J] · 2002 · 22 · 73
8. Fargione · International Journal of Fatigue[J] · 2002 · 24 · 19
9. Roy · Materials Science and Engineering A[J] · 2008 · 486 · 571
10. Shea · Materials Science and Engineering[J] · 1984 · 64 · 6
11. Jayakumar · Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J] · 2005 · 159 · 61
12. Vinogradov · Materials Science and Engineering A[J] · 2003 · 341 · 73
13. Barat · Materials Science and Engineering A[J] · 2014 · 597 · 45
14. Hao · Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J] · 2000 · 101 · 136
15. Venkataraman · Rev Prog Quant Nondestr Eval[J] · 2001 · 20 · 1450
16. Roy · Materials Science and Engineering A[J] · 2008 · 486 · 571
17. Grondel · NDT & E International[J] · 2002 · 35 · 146
18. Walther · International Journal of Fatigue[J] · 2007 · 29 · 1886
19. Starke · Materials Science and Engineering A[J] · 2009 · 523 · 247
20. Starke · International Journal of Fatigue[J] · 2006 · 28 · 1029
21. Walther · Materials Science and Engineering A[J] · 2007 · 468 · 265
22. Zhang · Journal of Central South University[J] · 2012 · 19 · 2708
23. Zhong · 2006 · 270