Design of a Corrugated Vascular Graft with Enhanced Compliance and Kink Resistance
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The development of a small‐diameter vascular graft for coronary artery bypass grafting necessitates a balance of key biomechanical properties to prevent failure. Prior iterative design of a multilayer vascular graft achieved arterial compliance‐matching to prevent failure due to intimal hyperplasia while retaining sufficient burst pressure and suture retention strength. Although promising, graft kinking prevented long‐term evaluation in vivo. To enhance kink resistance, a post‐electrospinning molding method was developed to impart a corrugated geometry. Corrugations enhance kink resistance during bending through expansion and folding of the pleats to prevent ovalization and subsequent buckling. The corrugated graft significantly improved kink resistance with kink radii similar to synthetic grafts used in the clinic. In contrast to prior literature, the corrugated grafts displayed compliance values in the range of arterial values (10.4%/mmHg × 10−2 ± 0.3%/mmHg × 10−2) for improved graft‐artery compliance‐matching. A finite element (FE) model of compliance was used to elucidate the effect of corrugated geometry on graft compliance. The FE‐predicted compliance values agreed well with experimental results and demonstrated an increase in Lagrange strain magnitude of the corrugated valleys that was correlated with a higher luminal compliance. To ensure clinical utility of corrugated grafts, candidate grafts were tested for suture retention strength, burst pressure, and stability under physiological loading. The corrugated graft retained biomechanical properties above or similar to reported values of the saphenous vein, demonstrating suitability for implantation. Finally, no significant change in graft dimensions demonstrated stability of the post‐fabrication corrugation geometry after 30 days under pulsatile flow. A small‐diameter vascular graft with this unique combination of biomechanical properties has the potential to improve long‐term outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft procedures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA
Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA
Deparment of Biomedical Engineering Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA
Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA
School of Engineering Medicine Texas A&M University Houston Texas USA
Funding
American Heart Association · National Institutes of Health · National Science Foundation
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/mame.20140010110.1002/mame.201400101 ↗
2. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics–2017 Update
3. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.02510.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.025 ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.b.3320110.1002/jbm.b.33201 ↗
5. 10.1002/jbm.b.3071010.1002/jbm.b.30710 ↗
6. 10.1177/153857441143329910.1177/1538574411433299 ↗
7. 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00028-310.1016/0021-9290(95)00028-3 ↗
8. 10.1039/D0BM00226G10.1039/D0BM00226G ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.a.3764110.1002/jbm.a.37641 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10487710.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104877 ↗
11. 10.1039/D0TB00055H10.1039/D0TB00055H ↗
12. 10.1007/s10439-018-02194-w10.1007/s10439-018-02194-w ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.01510.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.015 ↗
14. 10.1080/0040516860868890210.1080/00405168608688902 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jvssci.2020.03.00310.1016/j.jvssci.2020.03.003 ↗
16. 10.1515/cdbme-2015-012510.1515/cdbme-2015-0125 ↗
17. 10.1017/CBO9780511624278.01710.1017/CBO9780511624278.017 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00085-910.1016/S0020-7683(02)00085-9 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.405326710.1115/1.4053267 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12221-019-9342-910.1007/s12221-019-9342-9 ↗
21. D.Jiang A. J.Robinson A.Nkansah et al. “A Computational Framework to Optimize the Mechanical Behavior of Synthetic Vascular Grafts. bioRxiv. 2024:2024.2009.2005.608688 ”.10.1101/2024.09.05.608688 ↗
22. 10.1039/D2TB02825E10.1039/D2TB02825E ↗
23. 10.3389/fmats.2020.0022010.3389/fmats.2020.00220 ↗
24. Standardization IOf “ISO 7198‐2016 ”2016.
25. 10.1115/1.400569410.1115/1.4005694 ↗
26. MMG Remesh “FEBio Studio Manual ”2024 https://help.febio.org/docs/FEBioStudio‐2‐7/FSM27‐5.4.4.14.html.
27. 10.1515/cdbme-2020-301310.1515/cdbme-2020-3013 ↗
28. 10.1001/archsurg.1980.0138010001800410.1001/archsurg.1980.01380100018004 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.011 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jvssci.2020.05.00110.1016/j.jvssci.2020.05.001 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.08610.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.086 ↗
32. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199910)47:1<65::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199910)47:1<65::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.03310.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.033 ↗
34. 10.3390/polym1404072110.3390/polym14040721 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)38820-810.1016/S0022-5223(19)38820-8 ↗
36. 10.1080/00914037.2018.147386510.1080/00914037.2018.1473865 ↗
37. 10.1177/088532822091002110.1177/0885328220910021 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jvssci.2020.05.00110.1016/j.jvssci.2020.05.001 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.00210.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.002 ↗