journal article·2006-12

Assessment of the relative skin sensitization potency of siloranes and bis‐GMA using the local lymph node assay and QSAR predicted potency

E.L. Kostoryz, Q. Zhu, H. Zhao, M. Miller, J.D. Eick

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Siloranes are silicon and oxirane (epoxy) containing monomers used for new dental composite development. The siloranes 3,4‐epoxycyclohexylethyl‐cyclopolymethylsiloxane (Tet‐Sil) and bis‐3,4‐epoxycyclohexylethyl‐phenyl‐methylsilane (Ph‐Sil) have in common cycloaliphatic epoxy moieties. The epoxy group is of concern in their biocompatibility since most epoxy compounds are known skin sensitizers. The objective of this study was to determine the in vivo skin sensitization potency of the siloranes in the local lymph node assay. A comparison was made with well‐known chemical allergens, bis‐GMA and DNCB. Female mice (CBA/CaJ) were exposed topically (dorsum of both ears) to several doses of acetone:olive oil in the ratio of 4:1 v/v. Doses were defined by a predictive structure‐activity model (QSAR) for contact sensitization. Lymph node cell (LNC) proliferation was measured on the sixth day by incorporation of radioactive thymidine into DNA of lymph node cells. The effective concentration (EC3) that produced a 3‐fold stimulation in LNC proliferation relative to controls was extrapolated from dose‐response curves. DNCB was a strong sensitizer (EC3 = 0.06%). The EC3 values of Ph‐Sil and bis‐GMA were 19% and 45%, respectively, making these weak contact sensitizers. Tet‐Sil did not increase lymph node proliferation when compared with controls. In contrast to Tet‐Sil, the unpolymerized monomers Ph‐Sil and bis‐GMA have the capacity to induce LNC proliferation, characteristic of a T‐cell mediated skin contact sensitization. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2006
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Contact Dermatitis and Allergies · Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery · Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Exploring beyond methacrylates
2. 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00465.x10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00465.x ↗
3. 10.1080/00016350175054120010.1080/000163501750541200 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1984.tb00148.x10.1111/j.1600-0536.1984.tb00148.x ↗
5. 10.1038/sj.bdj.480949910.1038/sj.bdj.4809499 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0128b.x10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0128b.x ↗
7. 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00304.x10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00304.x ↗
8. 10.1097/01634989-200312000-0000310.1097/01634989-200312000-00003 ↗
9. Anonymous.The murine local lymph node assay: A test method for assessing the allergic contact dermatitis potential of chemical/compounds. Interagency Coordingating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences 1999. NIH Publication No. 99–4494.3.
10. 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.470601.x10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.470601.x ↗
11. 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01704-110.1016/S0165-6147(00)01704-1 ↗
12. European Centre for Ecotoxicological and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) · 2003
13. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.02.00210.1016/j.yrtph.2004.02.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/0300-483X(95)03132-Y10.1016/0300-483X(95)03132-Y ↗
15. 10.1021/ci050018z10.1021/ci050018z ↗
16. 10.1081/JLC-10010339110.1081/JLC-100103391 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00290.x10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00290.x ↗
18. 10.1023/A:101581031246510.1023/A:1015810312465 ↗
19. Abbas AK · 2004 · 322
20. 10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00207-310.1016/S1383-5718(02)00207-3 ↗
21. 10.1177/15440591040830010410.1177/154405910408300104 ↗