journal article·2024-09Open access

Solvent‐cast 3D printing with molecular weight polymer blends to decouple effects of scaffold architecture and mechanical properties on mesenchymal stromal cell fate

John W. Tolbert, Tyler French, Andrew Kitson, Chiebuka Okpara, Diana E. Hammerstone, Santiago Lazarte, Tomas F. Babuska, Tomas Gonzalez‐Fernandez, Brandon A. Krick, Lesley W. Chow

Abstract

Abstract The biochemical and physical properties of a scaffold can be tailored to elicit specific cellular responses. However, it is challenging to decouple their individual effects on cell‐material interactions. Here, we solvent‐cast 3D printed different ratios of high and low molecular weight (MW) poly(caprolactone) (PCL) to fabricate scaffolds with significantly different stiffnesses without affecting other properties. Ink viscosity was used to match processing conditions between inks and generate scaffolds with the same surface chemistry, crystallinity, filament diameter, and architecture. Increasing the ratio of low MW PCL resulted in a significant decrease in modulus. Scaffold modulus did not affect human mesenchymal stromal cell (hMSC) differentiation under osteogenic conditions. However, hMSC response was significantly affected by scaffold stiffness in chondrogenic media. Low stiffness promoted more stable chondrogenesis whereas high stiffness drove hMSC progression toward hypertrophy. These data illustrate how this versatile platform can be used to independently modify biochemical and physical cues in a single scaffold to synergistically enhance desired cellular response.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Silk-based biomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Polymer Science and Engineering Program Lehigh University Bethlehem Pennsylvania USA

Department of Materials Science and Engineering Lehigh University Bethlehem Pennsylvania USA

Department of Bioengineering Lehigh University Bethlehem Pennsylvania USA

Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, FAMU‐FSU College of Engineering Florida State University Tallahassee Florida USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering, FAMU‐FSU College of Engineering Florida State University Tallahassee Florida USA

Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque New Mexico USA

Funding

National Science Foundation · Lehigh University · P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Science, Lehigh University

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/jbm.a.3684710.1002/jbm.a.36847 ↗
2. 10.3390/polym1317295010.3390/polym13172950 ↗
3. 10.1002/bdrc.2017310.1002/bdrc.20173 ↗
4. 10.1089/ten.teb.2019.025010.1089/ten.teb.2019.0250 ↗
5. 10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/02502010.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025020 ↗
6. 10.1039/C5RA08048G10.1039/C5RA08048G ↗
7. 10.1089/ten.tec.2018.030710.1089/ten.tec.2018.0307 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.04110.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.041 ↗
9. 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.013510.1089/ten.tea.2011.0135 ↗
10. Microsphere‐based scaffolds carrying opposing gradients of chondroitin sulfate and tricalcium phosphate
11. 10.1039/C4BM00397G10.1039/C4BM00397G ↗
12. 10.1038/s41598-022-15602-y10.1038/s41598-022-15602-y ↗
13. 10.1021/la201810510.1021/la2018105 ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat448910.1038/nmat4489 ↗
15. 10.1126/sciadv.ade949710.1126/sciadv.ade9497 ↗
16. Substrate stiffness controls osteoblastic and chondrocytic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells without exogenous stimuli10.1371/journal.pone.0170312 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.01610.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.016 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.04410.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.01410.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.014 ↗
20. 10.1093/rb/rbv00110.1093/rb/rbv001 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.05210.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.052 ↗
23. 10.1002/adhm.20160008310.1002/adhm.201600083 ↗
24. 10.1002/adhm.20150006710.1002/adhm.201500067 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.07110.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.071 ↗
26. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.44910.1089/ten.2006.12.449 ↗
27. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960103)59:1<37::AID-APP6>3.0.CO;2-N10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960103)59:1<37::AID-APP6>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
28. 10.1002/pol.1981.18019051410.1002/pol.1981.180190514 ↗
29. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19990801)37:15<1803::AID-POLB5>3.0.CO;2-M10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19990801)37:15<1803::AID-POLB5>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
30. 10.1021/ma00227a01910.1021/ma00227a019 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11058210.1016/j.matdes.2022.110582 ↗
32. 10.1002/mame.20210044210.1002/mame.202100442 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.21349810.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213498 ↗
34. 10.1039/C9BM00887J10.1039/C9BM00887J ↗
35. 10.1039/D1BM00859E10.1039/D1BM00859E ↗
36. 10.14440/jbm.2021.35310.14440/jbm.2021.353 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.00110.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.001 ↗
38. 10.1002/pat.483810.1002/pat.4838 ↗
39. High‐throughput, multi‐image cryohistology of mineralized tissues
40. 10.1007/978-1-0716-1028-2_1510.1007/978-1-0716-1028-2_15 ↗
41. 10.1016/0009-2614(74)85412-610.1016/0009-2614(74)85412-6 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.168254510.1063/1.1682545 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.02710.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.027 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.171222210.1063/1.1712222 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.167480910.1063/1.1674809 ↗
46. 10.1088/0960-1317/18/11/11502010.1088/0960-1317/18/11/115020 ↗
47. 10.1021/la403642510.1021/la4036425 ↗
48. 10.1002/smll.20130097510.1002/smll.201300975 ↗
49. 10.1016/0032-3861(85)90025-410.1016/0032-3861(85)90025-4 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.macromol.3c0023410.1021/acs.macromol.3c00234 ↗
51. 10.1002/advs.20220318310.1002/advs.202203183 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.02210.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.022 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.02410.1016/j.msec.2017.02.024 ↗
54. 10.1002/art.2337010.1002/art.23370 ↗
55. 10.3390/ijms2104144410.3390/ijms21041444 ↗
56. 10.1038/nmat388910.1038/nmat3889 ↗
57. 10.1177/2041731422112212110.1177/20417314221122121 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.01810.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.018 ↗