journal article·2026-01-06Open access

Design rules for 3D micro-extrusion of Cu

Samanwitha Kolli, Jo Verwimp, Marleen Rombouts, Jozef Vleugels

Rapid Prototyping Journal· Volume 32· Issue 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the manufacturing limitations of copper paste-based 3D micro-extrusion, an indirect additive manufacturing (AM) approach. The focus is on evaluating the feasibility of producing complex geometrical features and identifying sensitivity to specific process parameters. Design/methodology/approach The research explores various complex features such as thin walls, internal channels, pins, and overhang structures using highly viscous pure copper pastes. Key parameters of printing and process were systematically varied to evaluate their influence on feature formation. Computed tomography (CT) analysis was used to assess the structural integrity and openness of features. Findings This study demonstrates the feasibility of manufacturing intricate features with a minimum wall thickness of 250 µm, and channel and pin feature dimensions as small as 0.43 mm and 0.32 mm, respectively. CT scans confirm the openness of fine channels throughout the part height. Overhang structures with inclinations up to 50° exhibit integrity without requiring support structures. However, single-track walls with a 10° inclination deform during high-temperature sintering but remain stable at slightly lower sintering temperatures. Overhang bridging gaps up to 1.2 mm were achievable. Originality/value This work highlights the potential of copper paste-based 3D micro-extrusion for fabricating complex geometries. It provides critical insights into the capabilities and limitations of the process and defines key constraints, offering valuable guidance for advancing the application of this AM technology in advanced manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

KU Leuven Department of Materials Engineering, , Leuven, , and Coating and Shaping Technologies Group, Flemish Institute for Technological Research – VITO NV, Boeretang, Belgium

Flemish Institute for Technological Research – VITO NV Coating and Shaping Technologies Group, , Boeretang,

KU Leuven Department of Materials Engineering, , Leuven,

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. The rise of 3-D printing: the advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011 ↗
2. An exploration of binder jetting of copper10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0180 ↗
3. Geometrically complex silicon carbide structures fabricated by robocasting10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05276.x ↗
4. Investigating complex geometrical features in LPBF-Produced parts: a material-based comparison between different titanium alloys10.1007/s12540-023-01460-4 ↗
5. Laser powder bed fusion: a review on the design constraints10.1088/1757-899x/1038/1/012065 ↗
6. Laser 3D printing of complex copper structures10.1016/j.addma.2020.101268 ↗
7. Geometric deviation and compensation for thin-walled shell lattice structures fabricated by high precision laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.addma.2022.103061 ↗
8. Process optimization of complex geometries using feed forward control for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.addma.2020.101169 ↗
9. Challenges in Three-Dimensional printing of High-Conductivity copper10.1115/1.4039974 ↗
10. Fabricating geometrically-complex B4C ceramic components by robocasting and pressureless spark plasma sintering10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.10.001 ↗
11. Advanced metal powder based manufacturing of complex components by electron beam melting10.1179/106678509X12475882446133 ↗
12. Selected design rules for material extrusion-based additive manufacturing of alumina based nozzles and heat exchangers considering limitations in printing, debinding, and sintering10.1016/j.addma.2023.103719 ↗
13. Manufacturability of AlSi10Mg overhang structures fabricated by laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.043 ↗
14. Process optimization and characterization of dense pure copper parts produced by paste-based 3D micro-extrusion10.1016/j.addma.2023.103670 ↗
15. Fabrication and properties of extrusion-based 3D-printed hardmetal and cermet components10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2019.04.011 ↗
16. Design methodology for fused filament fabrication with failure theory: framework, database, design rule, methodology and study of case10.1108/RPJ-04-2024-0159 ↗
17. Malik · 2022 · 10910.1007/978-981-19-2293-0_5 ↗
18. An investigation of key design for additive manufacturing constraints in multimaterial Three-Dimensional printing10.1115/1.4030991 ↗
19. Binder jetting of a complex-shaped metal partial denture framework10.1016/j.addma.2018.02.014 ↗
20. Binder jet 3D printing—process parameters, materials, properties, modeling, and challenges10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100707 ↗
21. A comprehensive review on laser powder bed fusion of steels: processing, microstructure, defects and control methods, mechanical properties, current challenges and future trends10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.033 ↗
22. Complex geometry and integrated macro-porosity: clinical applications of electron beam melting to fabricate bespoke bone-anchored implants10.1016/j.actbio.2022.06.002 ↗
23. Fused deposition modeling design rules for plastics
24. Ceramic robocasting: recent achievements, potential, and future developments10.1002/adma.201802404 ↗
25. Sustainability of additive manufacturing: an overview on its energy demand and environmental impact10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.022 ↗
26. Sintering behaviour of aluminium in different atmospheres
27. Optimization of extrusion based ceramic 3D printing process for complex bony designs10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.054 ↗
28. An integrated design methodology for components produced by laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) process10.1080/17452759.2018.1442229 ↗
29. Experimental and numerical characterization of pure copper heat sinks produced by laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110415 ↗
30. Evaluation of 3d-Printed magnetic materials for Additively-Manufactured electrical machines10.2139/ssrn.4267905 ↗
31. Thomas · 2009 · 154
32. Design for additive manufacturing: trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004 ↗
33. 3D printing of highly pure copper10.3390/met9070756 ↗
34. Fused deposition modeling design rules for building large, complex components10.1080/16864360.2015.1114393 ↗
35. Advantages and drawbacks of additive manufacturing10.5937/imk1702057v ↗
36. Experimental analysis of additively manufactured component and design guidelines for lightweight structures: a case study using electron beam melting10.1016/j.addma.2020.101088 ↗
37. Lightweight design of an AlSi10Mg aviation control stick additively manufactured by laser powder bed fusion10.1108/RPJ-02-2022-0064 ↗
38. Support-strategies for robocasting ceramic building components10.52842/conf.ecaade.2023.1.377 ↗
40. A 3D-printing method of fabrication for metals, ceramics, and multi-materials using a universal self-curable technique for robocasting10.1039/c9mh01690b ↗
41. Binder jetting: a review of process, materials, and methods10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.031 ↗
42. An exploration of binder jetting of copper
43. Surface modified copper alloy powder for reliable laser-based additive manufacturing10.1016/j.addma.2020.101418 ↗
44. Fabrication and in vivo evaluation of Ti6Al4V implants with controlled porous structure and complex shape10.1007/s11465-012-0302-y ↗
45. Characterization and qualification of LPBF additively manufactured AISI-316L stainless steel brackets for aerospace application10.1007/s41403-020-00159-x ↗
46. Topology optimization and characterization of Ti6Al4V ELI cellular lattice structures by laser powder bed fusion for biomedical applications10.1016/j.msea.2019.138330 ↗