Capability analysis of selective laser sintering process for additive manufacturing of polyamide-12 porous bone scaffolds
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to focus on conducting a comprehensive process capability analysis of the selective laser sintering (SLS) process for manufacturing porous bone scaffolds with precise external dimensions, using polyamide-12 (PA2200) powder material. Design/methodology/approach Sixty porous scaffold specimens were initially fabricated using the EOSINT P395 SLS printer with recycled PA2200 powder. As the printer calibration was overdue, the experiment was subsequently repeated using both recycled and virgin PA2200 powder following proper calibration. Dimensional measurements of specimen length and height were obtained using a coordinate measuring machine. Tolerance grades, dimensional deviations and process capability indices (Cp and Cpk) were analyzed. Furthermore, an in vitro study was performed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of PA2200 using chick embryo fibroblast cells. Findings Initial specimens fabricated with recycled powder exhibited tolerance grades ranging from IT01 to IT10, with Cp and Cpk values below 1, indicating the process was incapable of meeting the required specifications. Following overdue printer calibration, the process improved, with Cp and Cpk values exceeding 1 and becoming nearly identical, suggesting a centered and more consistent process with tolerance grades ranging from IT0 to IT9. A similar analysis using virgin powder yielded comparable results, showing no notable improvement in process capability. Further analysis with recycled powder revealed that increasing the specification limits from ±0.10 to ±0.13 mm substantially improved Cp and Cpk values, bringing them in line with industry standards. Additionally, in vitro studies confirmed that PA2200 scaffolds support chick embryo fibroblast attachment, indicating good biocompatibility and potential for use in 3D tissue engineering applications. Originality/value This study highlights the vital importance of process monitoring and printer calibration in ensuring the dimensional accuracy and part conformity necessary for high-precision applications such as bone tissue engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Guna,
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. The rise of 3-D printing: the advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011 ↗
2. Parametric optimization for dimensional correctness of 3D printed part using masked stereolithography: Taguchi method10.1108/RPJ-03-2022-0080 ↗
3. Comparative study about dimensional accuracy and form errors of FFF printed spur gears using PLA and nylon10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107862 ↗
4. Implementation of rapid manufacturing for mass customization10.1108/JMTM-01-2016-0007 ↗
5. Assessment of the morphology and dimensional accuracy of 3D printed PLA and PLA/HAp scaffolds10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103616 ↗
6. Factors affecting dimensional precision of consumer 3D printing
7. Accuracy of orthognathic surgery- a retrospective service evaluation10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.545 ↗
8. Dimensional error of selective laser sintering, three-dimensional printing and PolyJet™ models in the reproduction of mandibular anatomy10.1016/j.jcms.2008.10.008 ↗
9. An experimental investigation into the dimensional error of powder-binder three-dimensional printing10.1007/s00170-015-7482-7 ↗
10. Comparison of dimensional accuracies of stereolithography and powder binder printing10.1007/s00170-016-8988-3 ↗
11. Key parameters controlling surface quality and dimensional accuracy: a critical review of FFF process10.1080/10426914.2022.2032144 ↗
12. A review of Industry 4.0 and additive manufacturing synergy10.1108/RPJ-08-2021-0194 ↗
13. Rapid manufacturing and rapid tooling with layer manufacturing (LM) technologies, state of the art and future perspectives10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60206-6 ↗
14. Mode I and II fracture toughness investigation of laser-sintered polyamide10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102497 ↗
15. A procedure for designing custom-made implants for forehead augmentation in people suffering from APERT syndrome10.1007/s10916-020-01611-9 ↗
16. Design and additive manufacturing of patient-specific cranial and pelvic bone implants from computed tomography data10.1007/s40430-018-1425-9 ↗
17. Selective laser sintering of PA 2200 for hip implant applications: finite element analysis, process optimization, morphological and mechanical characterization10.3390/ma14154240 ↗
18. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.008 ↗
19. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy and material properties of the MakerBot 3D desktop printer10.1108/RPJ-09-2013-0093 ↗
20. Flow properties of polymeric powders for selective laser sintering10.1016/j.powtec.2020.05.069 ↗
21. Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing)10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.041 ↗
22. Fitment study of porous polyamide scaffolds fabricated from selective laser sintering10.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.094 ↗
23. Fabrication of three dimensional open porous regular structure of PA-2200 for enhanced strength of scaffold using selective laser sintering10.1108/RPJ-11-2014-0148 ↗
24. Process capability analysis of fused deposition modelling for plastic components10.1108/RPJ-02-2012-0018 ↗
25. Process capability analysis of a 3D printing process10.1080/09720502.2020.1721711 ↗
26. The accuracy of a method for printing three-dimensional spinal models10.1371/journal.pone.0124291 ↗