journal article·2023-04

Tuning the Poisson's ratio of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate/cellulose nanofibril aerogel scaffold precisely for cultivation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell

Dong Sun, Wangyu Liu, Aimin Tang, Feng Zhou

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Tissue engineering (TE) scaffolds with appropriate Poisson's ratio (PR) are suitable for mimicking the environment of native tissues on which cells could survive and thrive better. Herein, cellular structured scaffolds are made by a new composite poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate/cellulose nanofibril aerogel, with prototypes of the hexagonal, reentrant, and semireentrant models. Scaffolds with different geometry parameters (l, t, α) are designed and simulated by COMSOL to enable precise regulation of their PR. Then, nine groups of scaffolds with different PRs ranging from −0.5 to 0.85 are designed by adjusting geometry parameters and fabricated by using stereolithography and freeze‐drying techniques. Subsequently, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSc) are cultured on these scaffolds for 21 days, during which CCK8 assay, fluorescence microscope observation, and real‐time polymerase chain reaction experiments are performed to characterize the proliferation and differentiation of BMSc. The results reflect that the scaffolds with different PR can provide various stress environments for cells, and the scaffold with zero PR is the most suitable for BMSc differentiating into chondrocytes during early culture experiments. This study suggests that tuning PR precisely is an attractive and effective strategy to provide a cells‐suitable environment for scaffold fabrication for TE.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering South China University of Technology Guangzhou China

State Key Lab of Pulp and Paper Engineering South China University of Technology Guangzhou China

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Function and Regulation in Agricultural Organisms, College of Life Sciences South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.15710.1038/nrrheum.2014.157 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.00510.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.005 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.235.4792.103810.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
4. Analysis of elastic modulus of conventional foams and of re‐entrant foam materials with a negative Poisson's ratio
5. 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.09.01210.1016/j.jmps.2011.09.012 ↗
6. 10.1002/pssb.20046037610.1002/pssb.200460376 ↗
7. 10.1002/adem.20100000510.1002/adem.201000005 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20090195610.1002/adma.200901956 ↗
9. 10.1002/pssb.20145130410.1002/pssb.201451304 ↗
10. 10.1002/adem.20100014010.1002/adem.201000140 ↗
11. 10.1177/1045389X1038258610.1177/1045389X10382586 ↗
12. 10.1002/pssb.20098203610.1002/pssb.200982036 ↗
13. 10.1177/1045389X1350285210.1177/1045389X13502852 ↗
14. 10.1002/pssb.20145137610.1002/pssb.201451376 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.02710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.027 ↗
16. Low porosity metallic periodic structures with negative Poisson's ratio
17. 10.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-210.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-2 ↗
18. 10.1039/c2sm07354d10.1039/c2sm07354d ↗
19. 10.1115/1.144990510.1115/1.1449905 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.00410.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.004 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00133-910.1016/S0021-9290(96)00133-9 ↗
22. 10.3233/BME-1991-110410.3233/BME-1991-1104 ↗
23. 10.1152/ajpheart.00891.200910.1152/ajpheart.00891.2009 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.01810.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.018 ↗
25. 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.009810.1089/ten.tea.2013.0098 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.09.00410.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.09.004 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.02610.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.026 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20120266610.1002/adfm.201202666 ↗
29. 10.1002/pssb.20124855010.1002/pssb.201248550 ↗
30. 10.1371/journal.pone.015568110.1371/journal.pone.0155681 ↗
31. 10.1007/s40684-021-00332-910.1007/s40684-021-00332-9 ↗
32. 10.1155/2013/85328910.1155/2013/853289 ↗
33. 10.1002/term.269510.1002/term.2695 ↗
34. 10.1039/C9SM00899C10.1039/C9SM00899C ↗
35. 10.1007/s10934-020-00938-510.1007/s10934-020-00938-5 ↗
36. 10.3390/nano1103060310.3390/nano11030603 ↗
37. 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.2183210.1302/0301-620X.91B5.21832 ↗
38. 10.1039/C9BM01829H10.1039/C9BM01829H ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.01910.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.019 ↗
40. 10.1098/rspa.1982.008810.1098/rspa.1982.0088 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.02510.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.025 ↗
42. 10.1038/nmat398710.1038/nmat3987 ↗