Regenerating airway epithelium using fibrous biomimetic basement membranes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract There are reciprocal interactions between epithelial cells and underlying basement membrane. The resemblance of biomaterials to native basement membrane is thus critical for their success when used to regenerate epithelium‐containing organs. Particularly, the use of nanofibers and the incorporation of basement membrane proteins may mimic both biophysical and biochemical properties of basement membrane, respectively. Herein we tested how electrospun polycaprolactone/heparin fibers with and without adsorbed laminin and collagen IV proteins affect epithelial cell functions. We found that airway epithelial cells attached, migrated, and proliferated on all scaffolds but protein‐functionalized fibers promoted higher attachment, quicker migration, and increased proliferation. Fibers were then integrated on polyethylene scaffolds and cultured at an air‐liquid interface. The detection of secretory and ciliated cell markers was higher in cells on polyethylene with fibers. These findings demonstrate that electrospun fibers incite beneficial epithelial cell responses and can be used in the fabrication of bioengineered functional epithelia.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Tracheal and airway disorders
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Head and Neck Regenerative Medicine Laboratory Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix Arizona USA
Division of Laryngology Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix Arizona USA
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.060310.1089/ten.teb.2012.0603 ↗
2. 10.1155/2012/98297110.1155/2012/982971 ↗
3. 10.21037/mps.2017.09.0110.21037/mps.2017.09.01 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.03.01710.1016/j.rmed.2013.03.017 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41598-018-37186-210.1038/s41598-018-37186-2 ↗
6. 10.1002/lary.2446910.1002/lary.24469 ↗
7. 10.1039/C8IB00138C10.1039/C8IB00138C ↗
8. 10.2353/ajpath.2006.05132110.2353/ajpath.2006.051321 ↗
9. 10.1177/175346581039653910.1177/1753465810396539 ↗
10. 10.3390/bioengineering801001310.3390/bioengineering8010013 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10439-019-02286-110.1007/s10439-019-02286-1 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41598-020-63922-810.1038/s41598-020-63922-8 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00418-018-1757-710.1007/s00418-018-1757-7 ↗
14. 10.1038/nbt138510.1038/nbt1385 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.08.10410.1016/j.bbrc.2018.08.104 ↗
16. Nagarajan S · 2018
17. 10.1002/adhm.20160022410.1002/adhm.201600224 ↗
18. Hybrid biomimetic electrospun fibrous mats derived from poly (ε‐caprolactone) and silk fibroin protein for wound dressing application10.1002/app.41653 ↗
19. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0006810.3389/fbioe.2019.00068 ↗
20. 10.1165/ajrcmb/8.1.6310.1165/ajrcmb/8.1.63 ↗
21. 10.1165/ajrcmb/4.5.44010.1165/ajrcmb/4.5.440 ↗
22. 10.1183/13993003.01200-201910.1183/13993003.01200-2019 ↗
23. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1997)37:1<33::AID-CM4>3.0.CO;2-I10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1997)37:1<33::AID-CM4>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-020-16239-z10.1038/s41467-020-16239-z ↗
25. 10.1016/j.bbrep.2019.10070710.1016/j.bbrep.2019.100707 ↗
26. 10.1002/jcb.2483410.1002/jcb.24834 ↗
27. 10.1165/rcmb.2006-0466OC10.1165/rcmb.2006-0466OC ↗
28. 10.1038/ng.26310.1038/ng.263 ↗