journal article·2022-01

Cytocompatibility of a mussel‐inspired poly(lactic acid)‐based adhesive

Sydney Hollingshead, Heather Siebert, Jonathan J. Wilker, Julie C. Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Incorporating catechols into polymers can provide strong adhesion even in moist environments, and these polymers show promise for use in several biomedical applications. Surgical adhesives must have strong bonds, be biocompatible, and function in a moist environment. Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) has a long history as a biocompatible material for hard tissue device fixation. By combining these concepts, catechol‐containing poly(lactic acid) (cPLA) polymers are created that are strongly adhesive and degrade in physiological environments. Here, we evaluated the cytocompatibility of cPLA with iron(III) or periodate (IO4−) cross‐linkers. Fibroblasts cultured in cPLA leachate or on cPLA films generally had slower growth and lower metabolism compared with PLA controls but no differences in viability. These results demonstrated that cPLA was not cytotoxic but that including catechols reduced cell health. When cPLA was cross‐linked with periodate, cells generally had reduced metabolism, slower cell growth, and poor actin fiber formation compared with PLA. These results are attributed to the cytotoxicity of periodate since cells cultured with periodate leachate had extremely low viability. Cells grown on the films of iron‐cross‐linked cPLA generally had high viability and metabolism but slower proliferation than PLA controls. These results indicate that the cPLA and iron‐cross‐linked cPLA systems are promising materials for biomedical adhesive applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Davidson School of Chemical Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA

Department of Chemistry Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA

School of Materials Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA

Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering West Lafayette Indiana USA

Funding

Division of Materials Research · Office of Naval Research Global

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.01510.1016/j.addr.2016.04.015 ↗
2. 10.1097/DSS.000000000000049210.1097/DSS.0000000000000492 ↗
3. 10.1002/admi.20180202110.1002/admi.201802021 ↗
4. 10.1021/jacs.6b1314910.1021/jacs.6b13149 ↗
5. 10.1002/pola.2836810.1002/pola.28368 ↗
6. 10.1002/cjoc.20160077810.1002/cjoc.201600778 ↗
7. 10.1002/chem.20150338010.1002/chem.201503380 ↗
8. 10.1039/C4CS00185K10.1039/C4CS00185K ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.7b0027010.1021/acsami.7b00270 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.01210.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.01910.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.019 ↗
12. Sin LT · 2013
13. Sin LT · 2013
14. 10.1007/s10439-015-1413-510.1007/s10439-015-1413-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.01010.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.010 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00192-006-0270-z10.1007/s00192-006-0270-z ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0221310.1021/acs.macromol.6b02213 ↗
18. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0254710.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02547 ↗
19. SantanielloE ManzocchiA FarachiC.Tetrabutylammonium periodate; a selective and versatile oxidant for organic substrates synthesis. Synthesis;1980:563‐565.10.1055/s-1980-29123 ↗
20. ISO 10993‐5:2018 Biological evaluation of medical devices—Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity.
21. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.05510.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.055 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.017 ↗
23. 10.1002/jbm.b.3343610.1002/jbm.b.33436 ↗
24. 10.1002/jbm.b.3172510.1002/jbm.b.31725 ↗
25. 10.1002/ppap.20110013910.1002/ppap.201100139 ↗
26. Fibroblast response is enhanced by poly(L‐lactic acid) nanotopography edge density and proximity
27. 10.1002/jbm.a.3617410.1002/jbm.a.36174 ↗
28. 10.1021/bm070048610.1021/bm0700486 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.02610.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.026 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.08.04610.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.08.046 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.07.05910.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.07.059 ↗
32. 10.1371/journal.pone.014207510.1371/journal.pone.0142075 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2012.10.01210.1016/j.jphotobiol.2012.10.012 ↗
34. 10.1002/jbm.a.3563310.1002/jbm.a.35633 ↗
35. 10.3390/polym803009210.3390/polym8030092 ↗
36. 10.1002/jbm.a.3593110.1002/jbm.a.35931 ↗
37. 10.1088/1748-6041/5/6/06501510.1088/1748-6041/5/6/065015 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.00110.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.001 ↗
39. 10.1021/am504566v10.1021/am504566v ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.6b0967610.1021/acsami.6b09676 ↗