Shape memory polymer foams with tunable interconnectivity using off‐the‐shelf foaming components
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The ability to easily and safety tune pore structures of gas‐blown polyurethane shape memory polymer (SMP) foams could improve their outcomes as hemostatic dressings or tissue engineering scaffolds and enable overall commercialization efforts. Incorporating physical blowing agents into the polymer mix can be used to tune pore size and interconnectivity without altering foam chemistry. Enovate (HFC‐254fa) is a commonly used physical blowing agent in gas‐blown foams, but the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers its use unacceptable because it is a hydrofluorocarbon that contributes to global warming. Here, off‐the‐shelf solvents accepted for use by the EPA, acetone, dimethyoxymethane (methylal), and methyl formate, were used as physical blowing agents by adding small volumes during foam fabrication. Increasing the physical blowing agent volume resulted in greater pore interconnectivity while maintaining SMP foam chemical and thermal properties. Pore size and interconnectivity also impacted cell and blood interactions with the foams. This work provides a safe and easy method for tuning SMP foam interconnectivity to aid in future commercialization efforts in a range of potential biomedical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances · Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, BioInspired Syracuse Syracuse University Syracuse New York 13244 USA
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/mabi.20060017710.1002/mabi.200600177 ↗
2. 10.1002/polb.2305610.1002/polb.23056 ↗
3. 10.1002/cphc.20170101510.1002/cphc.201701015 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.02.02310.1016/j.polymer.2013.02.023 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.6b0911010.1021/acsami.6b09110 ↗
6. Shape‐memory polymers
7. 10.1002/jbm.b.3348910.1002/jbm.b.33489 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0089510.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00895 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.10.00510.1016/j.actbio.2021.10.005 ↗
10. 10.1097/01.ta.0000199961.02677.1910.1097/01.ta.0000199961.02677.19 ↗
11. Part 13: first aid: 2010 American Heart Association and American Red Cross international consensus on first aid science with treatment recommendations
12. 10.7205/MILMED.170.9.77010.7205/MILMED.170.9.770 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.04810.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.048 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsabm.1c0051610.1021/acsabm.1c00516 ↗
15. 10.3390/molecules2520466010.3390/molecules25204660 ↗
16. 10.1002/jbm.a.3690110.1002/jbm.a.36901 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11605110.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116051 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma912099110.3390/ma9120991 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.08.01010.1016/j.cmpb.2010.08.010 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.01310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.013 ↗
21. BMP‐Induced osteogenesis on the surface of hydroxyapatite with geometrically feasible and nonfeasible structures: Topology of osteogenesis. [Online]. Accessed: 01‐Sep‐2021.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199802)39:2<190::aid-jbm4>3.0.co;2-k
22. 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.063910.1089/ten.teb.2009.0639 ↗
23. 10.1089/ten.tec.2014.045410.1089/ten.tec.2014.0454 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.00510.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.005 ↗
25. Polyurethane foam in a porcine aneurysm model10.1002/jbm.a.34782 ↗
26. 10.1295/polymj.36.36810.1295/polymj.36.368 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.06910.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.069 ↗
28. 10.3390/ma1110184110.3390/ma11101841 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.07.03710.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.07.037 ↗
30. 10.1002/marc.20160026810.1002/marc.201600268 ↗
31. 10.3390/mi1101008310.3390/mi11010083 ↗
32. 10.1021/la303788z10.1021/la303788z ↗
33. 10.1002/polb.2398210.1002/polb.23982 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.supflu.2019.10463010.1016/j.supflu.2019.104630 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.03.08410.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.03.084 ↗
36. J. Bartlo and Energsmart Open vs. Closed Cell Foam; 2014.
37. Substitutes in Flexible Polyurethane | US EPA. [Online].https://www.epa.gov/snap/substitutes-flexible-polyurethane
38. Effects of isophorone diisocyanate on the thermal and mechanical properties of shape‐memory polyurethane foams
39. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/6/05210.1088/0964-1726/16/6/052 ↗
40. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.710.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.7 ↗
41. 10.3390/polym1310156510.3390/polym13101565 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.02710.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.027 ↗
43. P. ISO · 2009 · 34