journal article·2025-09-24Open access

Energy absorption in non-stochastic cellular solids: a systematic review

Mattia Mele, Andrea Paffetti, Massimiliano De Agostinis, Stefano Fini, Giorgio Olmi, Dario Croccolo

Rapid Prototyping Journal· Volume 31· Issue 9

Abstract

Purpose Cellular solids have gained increasing attention due to the rising demand across various engineering disciplines for lightweight materials that combine high stiffness and strength with improved impact resistance. This study aims to give an in-depth insight into the current literature concerning the energy absorption characteristics of non-stochastic architectures under both static and dynamic loading conditions. Design/methodology/approach The methodology involved an organised search and classification of relevant studies sourced from Scopus database, based on a pre-defined set of keywords. Only articles demonstrating procedural clarity, thematic relevance and data accessibility were considered after a rigorous screening process. To minimise potential bias, inclusion and exclusion criteria were critically re-examined during the selection phase. Findings The literature on the energy absorption capabilities of cellular solids is rapidly growing, with particular emphasis on metallic materials fabricated via laser powder bed fusion, primarily tested under quasi-static loading conditions. Although truss-based designs have traditionally assumed a prominent role, equation-based geometries are attracting increasing interest owing to their distinctive characteristics. Research limitations/implications A comprehensive analysis of materials, additive manufacturing methods and unit cell types is presented to support structural performance evaluation. Furthermore, the proposed study enables the identification of potential research gaps, thereby serving as a valuable resource to prevent redundant work with limited scientific advancement. Originality/value This state-of-the-art overview delivers an updated and expanded examination of the literature, offering valuable contribution for researchers in the field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Bologna Department of Industrial Engineering, , Bologna,

Funding

European Union –NextGenerationEU (National Sustainable Mobility Center · Italian Ministry of University and Research Decree n. · National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 04 Component 2 Investment 1.5 NextGenerationEU, Call for tender

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Effect of strut length and orientation on elastic mechanical response of modified body-centered cubic lattice structures10.1177/1464420719841084 ↗
2. On the precipitation hardening of selective laser melted AlSi10Mg10.1007/s11661-015-2980-7 ↗
3. Multi-morphology lattices lead to improved plastic energy absorption10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108883 ↗
4. Effect of annealing on microstructures and mechanical properties of PA-12 lattice structures proceeded by multi jet fusion technology10.1016/j.addma.2021.102285 ↗
5. Topology-mechanical property relationship of 3D printed strut, skeletal, and sheet based periodic metallic cellular materials10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.006 ↗
6. Compressive properties of 3D printed auxetic structures: experimental and numerical studies10.1080/17452759.2019.1644184 ↗
8. On the competition for ultimately stiff and strong architected materials10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109356 ↗
9. High strain rate testing of hybrid TPMS structures10.1007/s40430-024-05002-w ↗
10. Aremu · 2016 · 8310.1007/978-3-319-22443-5_10 ↗
11. Multiscale analysis of cellular solids fabricated by EBM
12. The properties of foams and lattices10.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
13. Anisotropic Ti-6Al-4V gyroid scaffolds manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM) for bone implant applications10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.040 ↗
14. Fiber-reinforced composite sandwich structures by co-curing with additive manufactured epoxy lattices10.3390/jcs3020053 ↗
15. Investigation of the specific energy absorption of triply periodic minimal surfaces subjected to impact loading10.1051/epjconf/202125001022 ↗
16. Evaluation of the dynamic response of triply periodic minimal surfaces subjected to high strain-rate compression10.1016/j.addma.2021.102220 ↗
17. Banhart, J. (1999), “Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams”, available at:Link to the cited article.
18. Crashworthiness investigations for 3D printed multi-layer multi-topology carbon fiber nylon lattice materials10.1177/07316844241226834 ↗
19. Shape transformers for crashworthiness of additively manufactured engineering resin lattice structures: experimental and numerical investigations10.1016/j.mechmat.2024.104925 ↗
20. Quasi-static compressive responses and fatigue behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V graded lattice structures fabricated by laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110110 ↗
21. Improved mechanical properties and energy absorption of Ti6Al4V laser powder bed fusion lattice structures using curving lattice struts10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110140 ↗
22. Blanco, N. and Frovel, M. (2025), “Lattice structures for aerospace applications. URL”, available at:Link to the cited article.
23. Multi-objective bulk scale optimisation of an auxetic structure to enhance protection performance10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115729 ↗
24. The energy absorption behavior of 3D-printed polymeric octet-truss lattice structures of varying strut length and radius10.3390/polym15030713 ↗
25. Calise, G.J. and Saigal, A. (2017), “Anisotropy and failure in octahedral lattice structure parts fabricated using the FDM technology”, available at:Link to the cited article.10.1115/IMECE2017-70904 ↗
26. Experimental characterization and numerical investigation on different conformal lattice structures for specific energy absorption under quasi-static and dynamic loading10.1177/20414196251321495 ↗
27. Mechanical properties of an improved 3D-printed rhombic dodecahedron stainless steel lattice structure of variable cross section10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.07.006 ↗
28. In-situ synchrotron X-ray tomography investigation of the imperfect smooth-shell cylinder structure10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113926 ↗
29. Dynamic compressive behavior of a modified additively manufactured rhombic dodecahedron 316L stainless steel lattice structure10.1016/j.tws.2019.106586 ↗
30. Energy absorption of thin-walled tubes enhanced by lattice structures10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.04.049 ↗
31. Laser additive manufacturing of aluminum-based stochastic and nonstochastic cellular materials10.1016/j.jmst.2023.09.045 ↗
32. Mechanical behavior and failure mode of body-centered cubic, gyroid, diamond, and Voronoi functionally graded additively manufactured biomedical lattice structures10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106796 ↗
33. Chen, W. and Song, B. (2011), “Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar”, Springer US, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7982-7.10.1007/978-1-4419-7982-7 ↗
34. Additive manufacturing of metallic lattice structures: unconstrained design, accurate fabrication, fascinated performances, and challenges10.1016/j.mser.2021.100648 ↗
35. Chen · Microstructure, Porosity and Mechanical Properties of Selective Laser Melted AlSi10Mg · 202010.1016/j.cja.2019.08.017 ↗
36. Novel negative Poisson’s ratio lattice structures with enhanced stiffness and energy absorption capacity10.3390/ma11071095 ↗
37. Wide-range tuning of the mechanical properties of TPMS lattice structures through frequency variation10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111370 ↗
38. Ultra-stiff and quasi-elastic-isotropic triply periodic minimal surface structures designed by deep learning10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113107 ↗
39. Coupling lattice structure topology optimization with design-dependent feature evolution for additive manufactured heat conduction design10.1016/j.cma.2017.12.024 ↗
40. Chiocca · 2022 · 79910.1016/j.prostr.2022.12.101 ↗
41. Enhanced energy absorption performance of 3D printed 2D auxetic lattices10.1016/j.tws.2023.110650 ↗
42. Chowdhury · Laser Powder Bed Fusion: a State-of-the-Art Review of the Technology, Materials, Properties & Defects, and Numerical Modelling · 202210.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.121 ↗
43. Compressive properties of functionally graded lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.006 ↗
44. Compressive properties of electron beam melted lattice structures with density gradient10.25341/D4X306 ↗
45. Nonlinear static and dynamic modeling of energy absorption lattice structures behavior10.1080/15376494.2022.2064016 ↗
46. Fused filament fabrication for metallic materials: a brief review10.3390/ma16247505 ↗
47. Properties, applications and recent developments of cellular solid materials: a review10.3390/ma16227076 ↗
48. Mechanical design and energy absorption performances of novel plate-rod hybrid lattice structures10.1016/j.tws.2023.111349 ↗
49. Effect of atomic tessellations on structural and functional properties of additive manufactured lattice structures10.1016/j.addma.2021.102326 ↗
50. Design, fabrication, and properties evaluation of novel nested lattice structures10.1016/j.addma.2023.103510 ↗
51. Four questions in cellular material design10.3390/ma12071060 ↗
52. Classification and selection of cellular materials in mechanical design: engineering and biomimetic approaches10.3390/designs3010019 ↗
53. Design and characterization of 2.5D nature-inspired infill structures under out-plane quasi-static loading condition10.1155/2023/8918937 ↗
54. Experimental and numerical evaluation of tessellated lattice structure under inplane compression loading10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.045 ↗
55. Does topology optimization exist in nature?10.1007/s40009-021-01050-1 ↗
56. Characterization of penetrate and interpenetrate tessellated cellular lattice structures for energy absorption10.1177/14644207221129709 ↗
57. Numerical and experimental investigations of novel nature inspired open lattice cellular structures for enhanced stiffness and specific energy absorption10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103286 ↗
58. Dara · 2022 · 243410.1177/09544089221092894 ↗
59. Quasi-static and dynamic response of open lattice structures for enhanced Plateau stresses: simulation and experiment validation10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.111953 ↗
61. Concurrent topology optimization of multiscale structures with multiple porous materials under random field loading uncertainty10.1007/s00158-017-1689-1 ↗
62. High strain rate compressive behaviour of aluminium alloy foams10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-0 ↗
63. Deshpande, V.S., Ashby, M.F. and Fleck, N.A. (2001), “Foam topology bending versus stretching dominated architectures”, available at:Link to the cited article.10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00379-7 ↗
64. Mechanical properties and deformation behaviour of ARCH and BCT lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting, institute of physics publishing10.1088/1757-899X/727/1/012001 ↗
65. Crushing behavior of honeycomb vs. foam under combined shear-compression loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103696 ↗
66. 3D metal printing technology: the need to re-invent design practice10.1007/s00146-018-0809-9 ↗
67. The additive manufacturing (AM) of titanium alloys10.1016/j.mprp.2016.12.062 ↗
68. Computationally designed lattices with tuned properties for tissue engineering using 3D printing10.1371/journal.pone.0182902 ↗
69. Combining multiple lattice-topology functional grading strategies for enhancing the dynamic compressive behavior of TPMS-based metamaterials10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.247 ↗
70. Experimental investigation of rhombic dodecahedron micro-lattice structures manufactured by electron beam melting
71. Defects in 3D printing and strategies to enhance quality of FFF additive manufacturing10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-lw1ns ↗
72. Effect of vertical strut arrangements on compression characteristics of 3D printed polymer lattice structures: experimental and computational study10.1007/s11665-018-3810-z ↗
73. The efficacy of finite element analysis (FEA) as a design tool for food packaging: a review10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.06.015 ↗
74. Coupled finite element-discrete element method (FEM/DEM) for modelling hypervelocity impacts10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.11.026 ↗
75. Composite curved hourglass cellular structures: design optimization for stiffness response and crashworthiness performance10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117834 ↗
76. Enhancing the mechanical performance of additively manufactured auxetic structures through design modifications: experimental and numerical analysis10.1007/s40964-025-01062-z ↗
77. Mechanical properties and deformation behavior of functionally graded TPMS structures under static and dynamic loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104554 ↗
78. Fergani · 201710.1063/1.5008027 ↗
79. Mechanical performance of additively manufactured lightweight cellular solids: influence of cell pattern and relative density on the printing time and compression behavior10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110474 ↗
80. Mechanical performance of bio-inspired gyroid and primitive concrete structures under combined compression and torsion loads: a discrete element method study10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116429 ↗
81. Quasi-static and fatigue performance of Ti-6Al-4V triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds manufactured via laser powder bed fusion for hard-tissue engineering10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103101 ↗
82. Dynamic compressive and flexural behaviour of re-entrant auxetics: a numerical study10.3390/ma16155219 ↗
83. Compressive properties of additively manufactured functionally graded Kagome lattice structure10.3390/met9050517 ↗
84. Performance of strut-reinforced Kagome truss core structure under compression fabricated by selective laser melting10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107541 ↗
85. A detailed analysis on the microstructure and compressive properties of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V lattice structures10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109292 ↗
86. Gilat, A. and Cheng, C.S. (2002), “Modeling torsional Split-Hopkinson bar tests at strain rates above 10,000 s−1”, available at:Link to the cited article.10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00055-9 ↗
87. Lattice-based crash box design by discrete topology optimization for 3D printing
88. In situ characterization of the deformation and failure behavior of non-stochastic porous structures processed by selective laser melting10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.026 ↗
89. Determination of strain rate sensitivity of micro-struts manufactured using the selective laser melting method10.1007/s11665-018-3208-y ↗
90. Energy absorption enhancement of additively manufactured hexagonal and re-entrant (auxetic) lattice structures by using multi-material reinforcements10.1016/j.addma.2022.103076 ↗
91. Review on auxetic materials
92. 3D lightweight double arrow-head plate-lattice auxetic structures with enhanced stiffness and energy absorption performance10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115484 ↗
93. Characterization of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V for chemical, marine and industrial applications10.1016/j.matchar.2003.10.006 ↗
94. Fabrication of polymeric lattice structures for optimum energy absorption using multi jet fusion technology10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.059 ↗
95. Investigation of torsional properties of surface- and strut-based lattice structures manufactured using multijet fusion technology10.1007/s00170-022-08681-8 ↗
96. Compressive deformation and energy absorbing characteristic of foamed aluminum10.1007/s11661-998-0221-z ↗
97. Mechanical properties of additively manufactured metal lattice structures: data review and design interface10.1016/j.addma.2020.101301 ↗
98. Hanzl, P., Zetková, I. and Daňa, M. (2019), “Uniaxial tensile load of lattice structures produced by metal additive manufacturing 19”, available at:Link to the cited article.10.21062/ujep/274.2019/a/1213-2489/MT/19/2/228 ↗
99. Evaluation of compression behaviour of 316L SS gyroid and diamond structures using SLM process – experimental programme under static and dynamic compression loadings10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105147 ↗
100. Mechanical behavior of additively manufactured GRCop-84 copper alloy lattice structures10.1016/j.addma.2022.102928 ↗