Bioadaptive nanorod array topography of hydroxyapatite and TiO2 on Ti substrate to preosteoblast cell behaviors
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Bioadaptive nanostructure coatings of hydroxyapatite (HAP) and TiO2 on titanium (Ti) implants are essential for biomaterial‐tissue osteointegration. However, there is no specific report, so far, that focuses on the different influences of the two bioadaptive coatings on preosteoblast behaviors. Herein, adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic potential of preosteoblast on HAP and TiO2 coatings with nanorod array topography were studied. XRD, TEM, and SAED analysis indicated that rod‐like HAP nanoarray and anatase TiO2 nanoarray coatings were fabricated successfully, and there was insignificant difference in roughness and fibronectin adsorption of the two coatings. Adhesion and proliferation of MC3T3‐E1 cells on the two coatings were of no significant difference, besides a larger projected area of the cells on HAP coating. MC3T3‐E1 cells cultured on the HAP coating displayed significantly higher expression of runt‐related transcription factor‐2 (Runx2), osteocalcin (OCN) and collagen type‐1 (Col I) after culture for 21 days compared with those on TiO2 coating, except alkaline phosphatase (ALP). This study provides beneficial suggestion for intelligent selection of biocoatings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Jinan University Guangzhou China
The first affiliated hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University Guangzhou China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.04.11710.1016/j.ceramint.2017.04.117 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msec.2008.10.01510.1016/j.msec.2008.10.015 ↗
3. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19960616)61:4<609::AID-JCB15>3.0.CO;2-A10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19960616)61:4<609::AID-JCB15>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
4. 10.1166/jbn.2015.206510.1166/jbn.2015.2065 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00174-510.1016/S0142-9612(00)00174-5 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.02.03010.1016/j.tsf.2009.02.030 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.285.5430.102810.1126/science.285.5430.1028 ↗
8. 10.1155/2015/38646110.1155/2015/386461 ↗
9. In vitro dissolution and mechanical behavior of c‐axis preferentially oriented hydroxyapatite thin films fabricated by pulsed laser deposition
10. 10.1007/s00441-009-0832-810.1007/s00441-009-0832-8 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.02.00810.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.02.008 ↗
12. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.056710.1089/ten.tea.2010.0567 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.diff.2012.05.00110.1016/j.diff.2012.05.001 ↗
14. 10.1002/adem.20118005610.1002/adem.201180056 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.07.08110.1016/j.ceramint.2015.07.081 ↗
16. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/18/18300110.1088/0953-8984/28/18/183001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.04610.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.046 ↗
18. 10.1002/jbm.a.3418810.1002/jbm.a.34188 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.00710.1016/j.dental.2017.09.007 ↗
20. 10.2217/17435889.1.4.44910.2217/17435889.1.4.449 ↗
21. 10.1007/s12291-013-0408-y10.1007/s12291-013-0408-y ↗
22. 10.1023/A:100883881312010.1023/A:1008838813120 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20040017710.1002/adma.200400177 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.019 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10853-017-1513-810.1007/s10853-017-1513-8 ↗
26. 10.2147/IJN.S5850210.2147/IJN.S58502 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.12.02710.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.12.027 ↗
28. 10.1002/jbm.a.3536510.1002/jbm.a.35365 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.05410.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.054 ↗
30. 10.1002/jbm.a.3594110.1002/jbm.a.35941 ↗
31. 10.1039/C4NR07317G10.1039/C4NR07317G ↗
32. 10.1039/C6TB01401A10.1039/C6TB01401A ↗
33. 10.1016/j.nano.2016.01.01110.1016/j.nano.2016.01.011 ↗
34. 10.1002/jbm.a.3140110.1002/jbm.a.31401 ↗