Maximizing the strength of calcium sulfate for structural bone grafts
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Calcium sulfate (CS) combines remarkable properties of biodegradability, biocompatibility, and osteoconductivity but its low strength limits the range of its applications in orthopaedic surgery. In this study we have addressed this limitation by optimizing the fabrication process for pure CS, and by using mechanical testing procedures which are relevant for load carrying, or structural bone grafts (flexural tests in hydrated condition). By optimizing the processing parameters (pressure during setting, CS powder to water ratio, saturated solution) we produced CS samples with the highest flexural strength ever reported in hydrated conditions. Once these optimal conditions are used, the addition of “reinforcing” inclusions in the material decreased its strength because these inclusions actually act as defects instead of reinforcements. In addition, the CS can be formed in precise shapes while maintaining optimal processing conditions and provided a strength similar to that of bone with the same dimensions. Dense and porous materials can be combined to duplicate the trabecular and cortical architecture of long bones, with only a small loss of overall strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada
Jo Miller Laboratory McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.00910.1016/j.dental.2004.05.009 ↗
2. Anusavice K. · 2003
3. Ashby M. · 2010
4. 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.01010.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.010 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70014-610.1016/S1369-7021(10)70014-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.02810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.028 ↗
7. 10.1001/archotol.1980.0079031002900710.1001/archotol.1980.00790310029007 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0055151610.1007/BF00551516 ↗
9. 10.1088/1748-6041/6/1/01500710.1088/1748-6041/6/1/015007 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1969.tb06004.x10.1111/j.1834-7819.1969.tb06004.x ↗
11. Characteristics of calcium sulfate/gelatin composite biomaterials for bone repair
12. 10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.02910.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20090277810.1002/adma.200902778 ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.82004040710.1002/jbm.820040407 ↗
15. National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2007 summary
16. 10.1186/s40824-018-0149-310.1186/s40824-018-0149-3 ↗
17. 10.1590/S1678-7757200700050000810.1590/S1678-77572007000500008 ↗
18. 10.1177/01945998840920030610.1177/019459988409200306 ↗
19. Management of bone defects: A review of available techniques
20. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00148.x10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00148.x ↗
21. 10.1002/pen.1131010.1002/pen.11310 ↗
22. Bone graft substitutes: past, present, future
23. Park Joon · 2007 · 207
24. 10.3382/ps.065135710.3382/ps.0651357 ↗
25. 10.1097/00001665-200011040-0000910.1097/00001665-200011040-00009 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01062.x10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01062.x ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.01610.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
28. Sakaguchi R. L. · 2006
29. 10.1177/0022034582061006320110.1177/00220345820610063201 ↗
30. 10.1177/0022034581060008040110.1177/00220345810600080401 ↗
31. Reinforcing plaster of Paris
32. 10.1080/1478644210863626410.1080/14786442108636264 ↗
33. Resorption evaluation of a large bolus of calcium sulfate in a canine medullary defect10.3928/0147-7447-20030502-10 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00223-008-9157-y10.1007/s00223-008-9157-y ↗