journal article·2018-08

Development of asymmetric resorbable membranes for guided bone and surrounding tissue regeneration

C. Fidalgo, M. A. Rodrigues, T. Peixoto, J. V. Lobato, J. D. Santos, M. A. Lopes

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Membranes design for guided tissue engineering have been studied to aid in cell viability and function as tissue barriers. Two asymmetric resorbable membranes for guided bone regeneration (GBR) were produced: chitosan/pectin/poly‐caprolactone (PECm) and poly(vinyl alcohol)/polyethylenimine/poly(ethylene glycol) (PVAm). Both membranes were characterized by physical, chemical, mechanical, degradation rate, and in vitro biological assessment. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed the membranes asymmetry, in which PECm asymmetry is given by roughness and chemical composition, while PVAm's only by differences in porosity. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) identified chemical groups and bonds between polymers. Both sides of PVAm revealed to be hydrophobic, whereas the PECm presented one side with higher hydrophobicity than the other. In vitro biological assessment disclosed that PECm presented a higher cell adhesion growth pattern than PVAm, where it seemed to occur a delay in proliferation due to initial low cell adhesion. Both developed membranes are suitable for GBR, since both membranes fulfil the requirements to be used as a tissue barrier. The PECm has an additional role in cell viability that was not observed in the PVAm. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 106A: 2141‐2150, 2018.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Engenharia Metalúrgica e Materiais Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias Porto 4200‐465 Portugal

Centro Hospitalar Vila nova de Gaia/Espinho, Serviço de Estomatologia, Rua Conceição Fernandes Vila Nova de Gaia 4434‐502 Portugal

Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde ‐ Universidade Fernando Pessoa , Porto Portugal

REQUIMTE‐LAQV, Departamento de Engenharia Metalúrgica e Materiais Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias Porto 4200‐465 Portugal

Funding

COMPETE - Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2334/josnusd.51.38310.2334/josnusd.51.383 ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01922.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01922.x ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01150.x10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01150.x ↗
4. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.019 ↗
5. 10.1002/biot.20110029410.1002/biot.201100294 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01995.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01995.x ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01857.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01857.x ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2004.37101.x10.1111/j.1600-0757.2004.37101.x ↗
9. 10.1016/0142-9612(95)93857-A10.1016/0142-9612(95)93857-A ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.07.00910.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.07.009 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.00510.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.005 ↗
12. 10.1021/bm101110x10.1021/bm101110x ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.07.00210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.07.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.01.02010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.01.020 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.09.12010.1016/j.apsusc.2011.09.120 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.11.01010.1016/j.jcis.2011.11.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.01810.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cej.2007.09.03610.1016/j.cej.2007.09.036 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2006.05.00310.1016/j.vacuum.2006.05.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.09.00910.1016/j.cbpa.2006.09.009 ↗
21. Chalmers JM · 2002
22. 10.22203/eCM.v024a0110.22203/eCM.v024a01 ↗
23. 10.1111/nyas.1355310.1111/nyas.13553 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.02210.1016/j.dental.2012.04.022 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.00410.1016/j.msec.2006.05.004 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.11.00210.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.11.002 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.10.00610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.10.006 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ejps.2008.09.00410.1016/j.ejps.2008.09.004 ↗
29. Comparison of cellular proliferation on dense and porous PCL scaffolds
30. 10.2174/187437570110501003310.2174/1874375701105010033 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0928-0987(02)00104-510.1016/S0928-0987(02)00104-5 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.01.04810.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.01.048 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.01.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2007.01.008 ↗
34. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(20000605)50:3<353::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-C10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(20000605)50:3<353::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
35. 10.1021/la901402f10.1021/la901402f ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.03.02610.1016/j.jcis.2011.03.026 ↗
37. 10.1163/15685610778139387510.1163/156856107781393875 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.01910.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.019 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.04510.1016/j.dental.2006.06.045 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.09.01910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.09.019 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.12.02110.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.12.021 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.06910.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.069 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.04.00510.1016/j.jcis.2007.04.005 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.01410.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.014 ↗
45. 10.1007/s00289-005-0439-510.1007/s00289-005-0439-5 ↗
46. Chitosan based polyelectrolyte complexes as potential carrier materials in drug delivery systems. Ma
47. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
48. 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
49. 10.1016/S0079-6700(02)00149-110.1016/S0079-6700(02)00149-1 ↗
50. 10.1002/jbm.a.3509810.1002/jbm.a.35098 ↗
51. 10.1002/jbm.a.3527510.1002/jbm.a.35275 ↗
52. 10.3389/fbioe.2016.0004410.3389/fbioe.2016.00044 ↗
53. 10.1002/jbm.b.3090110.1002/jbm.b.30901 ↗
54. 10.1002/1097-4636(200111)57:2<217::AID-JBM1161>3.0.CO;2-I10.1002/1097-4636(200111)57:2<217::AID-JBM1161>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
55. 10.1002/jbm.a.2003310.1002/jbm.a.20033 ↗