Preparation and mechanical optimization of a two‐layer silk/magnesium wires braided porous artificial nerve guidance conduit
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Peripheral nerve injures have long been a tricky problem in surgery and a feasible treatment is the transplantation of nerve guidance conduits (NGCs). This study presents a two‐layer composite NGC with fair mechanical properties and good biocompatibility. The inner layer was made of degummed silk yarns/magnesium wires using braiding technology, and the outer layer was made from mixed solution of silk fibroin/chitosan (SF/CS) using freeze‐drying treatment. Orthogonal experimental design was applied to rationally design the braided structural layer and obtain the optimal combination of technical process parameters. Meanwhile, the SF/CS porous outer layer was optimized from three concentrations of SF/CS solution. In vitro and in vivo study suggested that the textile‐forming scaffold exhibited good biocompatibility and no toxicity. During 4 weeks' degradation, the skeleton of conduits retained its shape, and magnesium ions released from degraded magnesium wires contributed to sustainable release and uniform dispersion, proliferation and adhesion of Schwann cells, indicating potential approach in the development of NGCs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Nerve injury and regeneration · Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering Soochow University Suzhou China
Research Centre of Printed Flexible Electronics, School of Materials Science and Engineering Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen China
Wilson College of Textiles North Carolina State University Raleigh USA
Laboratory Animal Center of Soochow University Suzhou China
Funding
China National Textile and Apparel Council
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-12-801732-6.00001-X10.1016/B978-0-12-801732-6.00001-X ↗
2. 10.1002/biot.20170063510.1002/biot.201700635 ↗
3. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100173-8.00016-810.1016/B978-0-08-100173-8.00016-8 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.00910.1016/j.addr.2009.07.009 ↗
5. 10.1080/09506608.2016.125255110.1080/09506608.2016.1252551 ↗
6. 10.1089/neu.2006.016510.1089/neu.2006.0165 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.09310.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.093 ↗
8. 10.1155/2014/13235010.1155/2014/132350 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.02510.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.025 ↗
10. 10.1007/978-1-60761-984-0_1010.1007/978-1-60761-984-0_10 ↗
11. 10.1080/09205063.2019.169717010.1080/09205063.2019.1697170 ↗
12. Fused deposition modeling and fabrication of a three‐dimensional model in maxillofacial reconstruction
13. 10.1098/rsif.2011.043810.1098/rsif.2011.0438 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.011 ↗
15. Preparation and performance of polyester/silk woven heart valve
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.03010.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.030 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.04310.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.043 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.00810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.008 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.03010.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.030 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.02810.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.028 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.11208010.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112080 ↗
22. 10.1002/jbm.b.3311310.1002/jbm.b.33113 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jma.2020.07.00410.1016/j.jma.2020.07.004 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.10610.1016/j.msec.2017.04.106 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.00110.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.a.3617610.1002/jbm.a.36176 ↗
27. 10.1002/mabi.20140050210.1002/mabi.201400502 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.05.00410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.05.004 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.02.02210.1016/j.jconrel.2005.02.022 ↗
30. 10.1093/neuros/nyy12010.1093/neuros/nyy120 ↗
31. Dog sciatic nerve gap repaired by artificial tissue nerve graft
32. Influences of mechanical properties and permeability on chitosan nano/microfiber mesh tubes as a scaffold for nerve regeneration10.1002/jbm.a.31536 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.00910.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.009 ↗
34. 10.3389/fnmol.2016.0011710.3389/fnmol.2016.00117 ↗
35. 10.1002/term.153110.1002/term.1531 ↗
36. 10.1002/adhm.20210042710.1002/adhm.202100427 ↗
37. 10.1002/jbm.a.3715310.1002/jbm.a.37153 ↗
38. 10.1002/app.4921910.1002/app.49219 ↗
39. 10.1002/jbm.a.3702310.1002/jbm.a.37023 ↗