journal article·2011-11

Response of murine bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells to dry‐etched porous silicon scaffolds

Mohamad Hajj‐Hassan, Maedeh Khayyat‐Kholghi, Huifen Wang, Vamsy Chodavarapu, Janet E. Henderson

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Porous silicon shows great promise as a bio‐interface material due to its large surface to volume ratio, its stability in aqueous solutions and to the ability to precisely regulate its pore characteristics. In the current study, porous silicon scaffolds were fabricated from single crystalline silicon wafers by a novel xenon difluoride dry etching technique. This simplified dry etch fabrication process allows selective formation of porous silicon using a standard photoresist as mask material and eliminates the post‐formation drying step typically required for the wet etching techniques, thereby reducing the risk of damaging the newly formed porous silicon. The porous silicon scaffolds supported the growth of primary cultures of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) plated at high density for up to 21 days in culture with no significant loss of viability, assessed using Alamar Blue. Scanning electron micrographs confirmed a dense lawn of cells at 9 days of culture and the presence of MSC within the pores of the porous silicon scaffolds. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 2011.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2106/JBJS.E.0038110.2106/JBJS.E.00381 ↗
2. 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180325a4210.1097/BLO.0b013e3180325a42 ↗
3. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283025e9c10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283025e9c ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.b.3119910.1002/jbm.b.31199 ↗
5. 10.1002/term.17310.1002/term.173 ↗
6. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ca3b5810.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ca3b58 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.00610.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.006 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00133-110.1016/S0142-9612(98)00133-1 ↗
9. 10.1023/A:101434481955810.1023/A:1014344819558 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00044-910.1016/S0142-9612(03)00044-9 ↗
11. 10.1002/pssa.20030651910.1002/pssa.200306519 ↗
12. 10.1002/pssa.20046113410.1002/pssa.200461134 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.36330510.1063/1.363305 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.1995007121510.1002/adma.19950071215 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.01510.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.015 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.10.01510.1016/j.yexcr.2007.10.015 ↗
17. 10.1089/ten.a.2006.037010.1089/ten.a.2006.0370 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.35083910.1063/1.350839 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0927-796X(02)00090-610.1016/S0927-796X(02)00090-6 ↗
20. 10.1002/pssa.20046117710.1002/pssa.200461177 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.11796210.1063/1.117962 ↗
22. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/14/14510110.1088/0022-3727/42/14/145101 ↗
23. 10.1142/224110.1142/2241 ↗
24. 10.1023/B:JTAN.0000028047.00086.ef10.1023/B:JTAN.0000028047.00086.ef ↗
25. 10.1049/mnl.2009.010710.1049/mnl.2009.0107 ↗
26. 10.1093/hmg/ddh03410.1093/hmg/ddh034 ↗
27. 10.1371/journal.pgen.001007410.1371/journal.pgen.0010074 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-410.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.exger.2006.09.00810.1016/j.exger.2006.09.008 ↗
30. Bone graft substitutes in modern orthopedics10.3928/0147-7447-20021101-27 ↗
31. 10.5435/00124635-200709000-0000310.5435/00124635-200709000-00003 ↗
32. 10.1586/17434440.5.6.71910.1586/17434440.5.6.719 ↗
33. 10.1021/bm701112w10.1021/bm701112w ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.02810.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.028 ↗
35. Rodent model of adult stem cell transplantation for bone repair