Human saphenous vein endothelial cell adhesion and expansion on micropatterned polytetrafluoroethylene
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Intimal hyperplasia and thrombosis are responsible for the poor patency rates of small‐diameter vascular grafts. These complications could be avoided by a rapid and strong adhesion of endothelial cells to the prosthetic surfaces, which typically consist of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for small‐diameter vessels. We have previously described two peptide micropatterning strategies that increase the endothelialization rates of PTFE. The micropatterns were generated either by inkjet printing 300 μm squares or by spraying 10.1 ± 0.1 μm diameter droplets of the CGRGDS cell adhesion peptide, while the remaining surface was functionalized using the CWQPPRARI cell migration peptide. We now directly compare these two micropatterning strategies and examine the effect of hydrodynamic stress on human saphenous vein endothelial cells grown on the patterned surfaces. No significant differences in cell adhesion were observed between the two micropatterning methods. When compared to unpatterned surfaces treated with a uniform mixture of the two peptides, the cell expansion was significantly higher on sprayed or printed surfaces after 9 days of static cell culture. In addition, after 6 h of exposure to hydrodynamic stress, the cell retention and cell cytoskeleton reorganization on the patterned surfaces was improved when compared to untreated or random treated surfaces. These results indicate that micropatterned surfaces lead to improved rates of PTFE endothelialization with higher resistance to hydrodynamic stress. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 101A: 694– 703, 2013.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1097/00000658-195203000-0000610.1097/00000658-195203000-00006 ↗
2. 10.1002/macp.1985.02009198510910.1002/macp.1985.020091985109 ↗
3. 10.1016/0142-9612(91)90191-C10.1016/0142-9612(91)90191-C ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.82026060710.1002/jbm.820260607 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00001-510.1016/S0142-9612(98)00001-5 ↗
6. 10.1002/jbm.82024080910.1002/jbm.820240809 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00206-310.1016/S0142-9612(98)00206-3 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00334-910.1016/S0142-9612(01)00334-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0927-7765(99)00086-710.1016/S0927-7765(99)00086-7 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2004.00306.x10.1111/j.1365-2184.2004.00306.x ↗
11. 10.1021/bi025752f10.1021/bi025752f ↗
12. 10.1091/mbc.10.3.78510.1091/mbc.10.3.785 ↗
13. 10.1021/bk-1995-0602.ch03110.1021/bk-1995-0602.ch031 ↗
14. 10.1163/156856294X0047310.1163/156856294X00473 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.042 ↗
16. 10.1021/bi04917410.1021/bi049174 ↗
17. 10.1021/bc049717s10.1021/bc049717s ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.011 ↗
19. Impact of RGD peptide density grafted onto poly(ethylene terephthalate) on MC3T3 cell attachment
20. 10.2961/jlmn.2006.03.001510.2961/jlmn.2006.03.0015 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.033 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.08.02410.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.08.024 ↗
23. 10.1023/B:JMSM.0000032818.09569.d910.1023/B:JMSM.0000032818.09569.d9 ↗
24. 10.1021/bm201812u10.1021/bm201812u ↗
25. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990905)46:3<368::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-810.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990905)46:3<368::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.03710.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.037 ↗
27. 10.1242/jcs.09322910.1242/jcs.093229 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.042 ↗
29. 10.1021/la701323q10.1021/la701323q ↗
30. 10.1007/s10856-008-3381-x10.1007/s10856-008-3381-x ↗
31. Preliminary study of ferri‐ferrocyanide redox kinetics at the submillimeter boron‐doped CVD diamond electrode
32. 10.1007/s11626-999-0050-410.1007/s11626-999-0050-4 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00165-910.1016/S0142-9612(99)00165-9 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.817132010.1126/science.8171320 ↗
35. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.33510.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.335 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.00610.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.006 ↗
37. 10.1161/01.RES.77.1.4310.1161/01.RES.77.1.43 ↗
38. 10.1002/jbm.82025020910.1002/jbm.820250209 ↗
39. Characterization of FN‐C/H‐V, a novel synthetic peptide from fibronectin that promotes rabbit corneal epithelial cell adhesion, spreading, and motility
40. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.15-17.7710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.15-17.77 ↗
41. 10.1021/la900652y10.1021/la900652y ↗
42. 10.1021/bc049858u10.1021/bc049858u ↗
43. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.110.1089/ten.2006.12.1 ↗
44. 10.1016/0022-1759(84)90477-010.1016/0022-1759(84)90477-0 ↗
45. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-48210.1186/1471-2105-9-482 ↗
46. 10.1002/jbm.82025020910.1002/jbm.820250209 ↗
47. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90115-S10.1016/0092-8674(92)90115-S ↗
48. 10.1161/01.RES.0000039537.73816.E510.1161/01.RES.0000039537.73816.E5 ↗
49. 10.1126/science.276.5317.142510.1126/science.276.5317.1425 ↗
50. Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering10.1242/jcs.113.10.1677 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.04.00710.1016/j.biocel.2010.04.007 ↗
52. 10.1073/pnas.87.9.357910.1073/pnas.87.9.3579 ↗
53. 10.1529/biophysj.106.08973010.1529/biophysj.106.089730 ↗
54. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000130462.50769.5a10.1161/01.ATV.0000130462.50769.5a ↗
55. Remodeling of endothelial focal adhesion sites in response to flow—Quantitative studies by confocal image‐analysis
56. 10.1115/1.313827510.1115/1.3138275 ↗
57. 10.1242/jcs.0082310.1242/jcs.00823 ↗
58. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.52710.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.527 ↗
59. 10.1182/blood.V92.2.36210.1182/blood.V92.2.362 ↗