Production and evaluation of biosynthesized cellulose tubes as promising nerve guides for spinal cord injury treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a central nervous disorder that can result in permanent motor and sensory damage due to a severed communication pathway. Although there is currently no effective treatment, nerve guide tubes have been used to bridge the injured stumps and act as drug delivery systems. In this study, biosynthesized cellulose (BC) nerve guides were prepared, and nerve growth factor (NGF)—a model growth factor—was incorporated into the tubular nerve guide in order to obtain a nerve guide/drug delivery system to assist the regeneration. To achieve this, Gluconacetobacter hansenii was cultivated in a special bioreactor to produce biosynthesized cellulose tubes (BCTs) in situ, and the physical and mechanical properties of the BCTs obtained from different cultivation time points were evaluated. Our results showed that the properties of the BCTs were comparable to those of the native human neural tissues, and that the NGF released from the BCTs was bioactive for at least 7 days as evaluated by PC12 cell cultures in vitro. In summary, this study evaluated the use of BCT as a drug releasing nerve guide, and our results showed that the BCT is an attractive strategy to enhance nerve regeneration after the SCI.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Nerve injury and regeneration · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada
Hainan Institute of Science and Technology Haikou China
Ottawa‐Carleton Institute of Biomedical Engineering Ottawa Ontario Canada
Funding
Stem Cell Network
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1155/2015/94804010.1155/2015/948040 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.02610.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.026 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msec.2010.07.01010.1016/j.msec.2010.07.010 ↗
4. The mechanical properties of the human cervical spinal cord in vitro
5. 10.1002/bit.2131410.1002/bit.21314 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.10810.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.108 ↗
7. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal‐cord injury
8. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00172-010.1016/S0142-9612(98)00172-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.02910.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.029 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.03110.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.031 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.028 ↗
12. 10.1016/B978-0-08-087780-8.00122-410.1016/B978-0-08-087780-8.00122-4 ↗
13. 10.1023/B:CELL.0000046412.11983.6110.1023/B:CELL.0000046412.11983.61 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00120-510.1016/S0142-9612(02)00120-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ntt.2004.02.00610.1016/j.ntt.2004.02.006 ↗
16. 10.1002/jbm.a.3057010.1002/jbm.a.30570 ↗
17. Preliminary study on biosynthesis of bacterial Nanocellulose tubes in a novel double‐silicone‐tube bioreactor for potential vascular prosthesis10.1155/2015/560365 ↗
18. Long‐term regeneration and functional recovery of a 15mm critical nerve gap bridged by Tremella fuciformis polysaccharide‐immobilized polylactide conduits10.1155/2013/959261 ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02055.x10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02055.x ↗
20. 10.1097/BRS.000000000000102110.1097/BRS.0000000000001021 ↗
21. 10.3892/etm.2013.145410.3892/etm.2013.1454 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.injury.2010.12.03010.1016/j.injury.2010.12.030 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00021-110.1016/S0079-6700(01)00021-1 ↗
24. 10.5114/aoms.2013.3343310.5114/aoms.2013.33433 ↗
25. 10.2217/fnl.14.7110.2217/fnl.14.71 ↗
26. 10.1002/term.169410.1002/term.1694 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.04310.1016/j.msec.2019.04.043 ↗
28. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.028210.1089/ten.tea.2009.0282 ↗
29. 10.1002/adhm.20160134310.1002/adhm.201601343 ↗
30. 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.043010.1089/ten.tea.2011.0430 ↗
31. 10.1371/journal.pone.005715710.1371/journal.pone.0057157 ↗
32. 10.1080/03091902.2018.143574510.1080/03091902.2018.1435745 ↗
33. 10.1016/0304-3940(87)90233-310.1016/0304-3940(87)90233-3 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.02.02210.1016/j.polymer.2008.02.022 ↗
35. 10.1023/A:100895801427010.1023/A:1008958014270 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.msec.2010.08.00410.1016/j.msec.2010.08.004 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jss.2014.02.01110.1016/j.jss.2014.02.011 ↗
38. 10.1099/00221287-11-1-12310.1099/00221287-11-1-123 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.05210.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.052 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.03510.1016/j.msec.2013.07.035 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.12110.1016/j.msec.2016.11.121 ↗
42. Identification and biocellulose production of Gluconacetobacter strains isolated from tropical fruits in Thailand
43. 10.1002/jctb.511110.1002/jctb.5111 ↗
44. 10.1007/s11274-009-0151-y10.1007/s11274-009-0151-y ↗
45. 10.1016/B978-012164730-8/50022-810.1016/B978-012164730-8/50022-8 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.02510.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.025 ↗
47. 10.4103/1673-5374.15696610.4103/1673-5374.156966 ↗
48. 10.1089/ten.teb.2010.064810.1089/ten.teb.2010.0648 ↗
49. Polymers for fabricating nerve conduits10.1155/2010/138686 ↗
50. 10.1271/bbb.59.6510.1271/bbb.59.65 ↗
51. 10.1159/00049013910.1159/000490139 ↗
52. 10.1089/10763270175333764510.1089/107632701753337645 ↗
53. 10.1002/jbm.b.3179110.1002/jbm.b.31791 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.10.02310.1016/j.msec.2014.10.023 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.01910.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.019 ↗
56. 10.1002/jbm.a.3479610.1002/jbm.a.34796 ↗
57. 10.5504/BBEQ.2011.001010.5504/BBEQ.2011.0010 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.msec.2009.10.00710.1016/j.msec.2009.10.007 ↗