Chemical compatibility of common additive manufacturing polymers for electrochemical energy storage devices
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose Additive manufacturing is increasingly used for rapid prototyping of lab-scale electrochemical energy storage devices to quickly and cost-effectively screen novel materials and designs. While organic electrolytes offer higher working voltages than aqueous ones, the compatibility of organic solvents with commonly used additive manufacturing materials has been significantly understudied. The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the chemical compatibility of common additive manufacturing polymers with organic solvents relevant to electrochemical energy storage applications. Design/methodology/approach A two-stage framework was used to evaluate 40 polymer-solvent combinations for compatibility. First, swelling tests were conducted by soaking printed polymer samples in solvents for seven days, measuring weight and dimensions before and after exposure. Combinations with minimal swelling were then mechanically tested using tensile tests, comparing untreated samples to those soaked for seven days to assess changes in strength and elastic modulus. Findings The study found that some polymer-solvent combinations exhibit minimal swelling (<5%) yet undergo significant changes in mechanical properties. This suggests that traditional compatibility assessments based solely on weight and dimensional changes may be inadequate. Photopolymer resins used in stereolithography (SLA) generally outperformed thermoplastics used in fused deposition modeling (FDM). Among the tested materials, Polypropylene (FDM) and Formlabs’ Rigid 10 K (SLA) showed the most promise for applications involving long-term exposure to organic solvents. Additionally, swelling behavior in thermoplastics aligned with predictions from Hansen solubility parameters (HSP), indicating HSP analysis could be a useful prescreening tool. Originality/value This work introduces a comprehensive framework for evaluating polymer-solvent compatibility beyond conventional swelling metrics, offering valuable insights for the design of additive-manufactured components in electrochemical systems. The findings support the use of HSP analysis for material selection and highlight promising candidates for solvent-resistant applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, , Lexington, ,
University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research, , Lexington, ,
University of Kentucky Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, , Lexington, ,
University of Cincinnati Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, , Cincinnati, ,
Funding
National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS10.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
2. Obstructed flow field designs for improved performance in vanadium redox flow batteries10.1007/s10800-019-01306-1 ↗
3. 3D printing for aqueous and non-aqueous redox flow batteries10.1016/j.coelec.2020.02.005 ↗
4. 3D-printing for electrolytic processes and electrochemical flow systems10.1039/D0TA07939A ↗
5. Cobalt (II) complexes with azole-pyridine type ligands for non-aqueous redox-flow batteries: tunable electrochemistry via structural modification10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.034 ↗
6. ASTM INTERNATIONAL · 2021
7. 3D printing for electrochemical energy applications10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00783 ↗
8. Systematic approaches to improving the performance of polyoxometalates in non-aqueous redox flow batteries10.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.009 ↗
9. Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.053 ↗
10. Additive manufacturing for electrochemical (micro)fluidic platforms. Electrochemical society10.1149/2.F06161if ↗
11. Applicability of selected 3D printing materials in electrochemistry10.3390/bios12050308 ↗
12. Development of a membrane less organic redox flow battery
13. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002 ↗
14. Evolution of 3D printing methods and materials for electrochemical energy storage10.1002/adma.202000556 ↗
15. Revealing interactions of layered polymeric materials at solid-liquid interface for building solvent compatibility charts for 3D printing applications10.1038/s41598-019-56350-w ↗
16. Multielectron organic redoxmers for energy-dense redox flow batteries10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00668 ↗
17. Effect of infill parameters on tensile mechanical behavior in desktop 3D printing10.1089/3dp.2015.0036 ↗
18. On the use of solubility parameters to investigate phase separation-morphology-mechanical behavior relationships of TPU10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122882 ↗
19. Hansen · 200710.1201/9781420006834 ↗
20. The potentials of additive manufacturing for mass production of electrochemical energy systems10.1016/j.coelec.2020.02.008 ↗
21. Chemical compatibility of fused filament fabrication-based 3-D printed components with solutions commonly used in semiconductor wet processing10.1016/j.addma.2018.07.015 ↗
22. Convex solubility parameters for polymers10.1002/polb.23753 ↗
23. An overview of various additive manufacturing technologies and materials for electrochemical energy conversion applications10.1021/acsomega.2c05096 ↗
24. ISO · 2012
25. Chemical compatibility of battery electrolytes with rapid prototyping materials and adhesives10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02121 ↗
26. Recent developments in organic redox flow batteries: a critical review10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.057 ↗
27. Mass transport enhancement in redox flow batteries with corrugated fluidic networks10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.038 ↗
28. Swelling behavior and tensile strength of additively manufactured and commercial o-rings in the presence of linear, branched, cyclic, and aromatic compounds and alcohols10.1177/00952443221104105 ↗
29. Status and prospects of organic redox flow batteries toward sustainable energy storage10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01332 ↗
30. Design and manufacture of 3D-printed batteries10.1016/j.joule.2020.11.010 ↗
31. 3D-printed fluidic networks for high-power-density heat-managing miniaturized redox flow batteries10.1039/C6EE03192G ↗
32. Pencil and paper estimation of Hansen solubility parameters10.1021/acsomega.8b02601 ↗
33. Electrochemical engineering assessment of a novel 3D-printed filter-press electrochemical reactor for multipurpose laboratory applications10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07368 ↗
34. Considering lithium-ion battery 3D-printing via thermoplastic material extrusion and polymer powder bed fusion10.1016/j.addma.2020.101651 ↗
35. Elastomer solvent interactions III-effects of methanol mixtures on fluorocarbon elastomers10.1002/app.1986.070320213 ↗
36. Elastomer swelling and Hansen solubility parameters10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.05.007 ↗
37. An opensource platform for 3D-printed redox flow battery test cells10.1039/D1SE01851E ↗
38. Additive manufacturing of batteries10.1002/adfm.201906244 ↗
39. Relationship between Hansen solubility parameters of ABS and its homopolymer components of PAN, PB, and PS10.1080/00222341003603693 ↗
40. Effect of different solvents on the thermal, IR spectroscopy and morphological properties of solution casted PLA/starch films10.11113/mjfas.v10n1.67 ↗
41. 3D printing enables customizable batteries10.1002/batt.202300161 ↗
42. Vanadium redox flow batteries fabricated by 3D printing and employing recycled vanadium collected from ammonia slag10.1149/2.0251909jes ↗
43. Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS10.3390/ma8095271 ↗
44. Electrolytes for electrochemical energy storage10.1039/C6QM00169F ↗
45. A renaissance of N,N-dimethylacetamide-based electrolytes to promote the cycling stability of Li–O2 batteries10.1039/D0EE01897J ↗