journal article·2016-10

Roughness gradients on zirconia for rapid screening of cell‐surface interactions: Fabrication, characterization and application

Quentin Flamant, Ana‐Maria Stanciuc, Hugo Pavailler, Christoph Martin Sprecher, Mauro Alini, Marianna Peroglio, Marc Anglada

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Roughness is one of the key parameters for successful osseointegration of dental implants. The understanding of how roughness affects cell response is thus crucial to improve implant performance. Surface gradients, which allow rapid and systematic investigations of cell‐surface interactions, have the potential to facilitate this task. In this study, a novel method aiming to produce roughness gradients at the surface of zirconia using hydrofluoric acid etching was implemented. The topography was exhaustively characterized at the microscale and nanoscale by white light interferometry and atomic force microscopy, including the analysis of amplitude, spatial, hybrid, functional, and fractal parameters. A rapid screening of the influence of roughness on human mesenchymal stem cell morphology was conducted and potential correlations between roughness parameters and cell morphology were investigated. The roughness gradient induced significant changes in cell area (p < 0.001), aspect ratio (p = 0.01), and solidity (p = 0.026). Nanoroughness parameters were linearly correlated to cell solidity (p < 0.005), while microroughness parameters appeared nonlinearly correlated to cell area, highlighting the importance of multiscale optimization of implant topography to induce the desired cell response. The gradient method proposed here drastically reduces the efforts and resources necessary to study cell‐surface interactions and provides results directly transferable to industry. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 104A: 2502–2514, 2016.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering Universitat Politècnica De Catalunya Av. Diagonal 647 Barcelona 08028 Spain

Center for Research in Nano‐Engineering CRNE, Universitat Politècnica De Catalunya C. Pascual I Vila, 15 Barcelona 08028 Spain

AO Research Institute Davos Clavadelerstrasse 8 7270 Davos Platz Switzerland

Funding

European Commission (7th Framework Programme [Marie Curie Initial Training Networks, Bioceramics for bone repair]) · Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) of Spain · Government of Catalonia

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.03410.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.034 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.00710.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01785.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01785.x ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01876.x10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01876.x ↗
5. 10.1111/clr.1227210.1111/clr.12272 ↗
6. 10.1016/0955-2219(95)00035-S10.1016/0955-2219(95)00035-S ↗
7. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.09.00210.1016/j.dental.2014.09.002 ↗
8. 10.5772/1647510.5772/16475 ↗
9. On implant surfaces: A review of current knowledge and opinions
10. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.10.00710.1016/j.dental.2014.10.007 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20100176310.1002/adma.201001763 ↗
12. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces
13. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.00310.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.003 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x ↗
15. 10.1002/adhm.20130005310.1002/adhm.201300053 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.03710.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.037 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.019 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.01510.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.015 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.019 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0108910.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01089 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.02.14110.1016/j.apsusc.2015.02.141 ↗
22. 10.1098/rsif.2011.065910.1098/rsif.2011.0659 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.01610.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.016 ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20120044710.1002/adfm.201200447 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.01210.1016/j.msec.2015.11.012 ↗
26. 10.1039/b715466f10.1039/b715466f ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.04.01410.1016/j.apsusc.2006.04.014 ↗
28. 10.1021/la070042210.1021/la0700422 ↗
29. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00168.x10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00168.x ↗
30. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01734.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01734.x ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.09.02110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.09.021 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.09.02210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.09.022 ↗
33. 10.1016/0043-1648(93)90453-S10.1016/0043-1648(93)90453-S ↗
34. Siegmann S. · 1997
35. 10.1073/pnas.14122169810.1073/pnas.141221698 ↗
36. 10.4012/dmj.2012-20810.4012/dmj.2012-208 ↗
37. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200002)49:2<155::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200002)49:2<155::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.01610.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.016 ↗