Overcoming manufacturing challenges in the fabrication of thin-beam 316L stainless steel lattice cells via material extrusion debinding and sintering
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to deal with the manufacturing of six different unsupported thin-beam lattice cells with two beam size (2.0 and 2.4 mm) through material extrusion debinding and sintering (MEX+D&S) technology. Design/methodology/approach Printing thin and complex structures remains challenging with this multistep additive manufacturing (AM) processes. In this study, beam-based and unsupported lattice cells were designed, printed, debound and sintered using a commercial 316L stainless steel filament and a consumer 3D printer. First, shrinkage was evaluated at both the beam and the cell level, using the data obtained from a 3D structured light scanner. In addition, the same structures underwent compression testing to validate their mechanical response. Findings Six different unsupported lattice cells characterized by bridges and overhang features were successfully printed after a specific definition of printing parameters. One of them collapsed during debinding due to the combination of residual stress and absence of support. The shrinkage of the beam tended to increase when the angle between the beam and the printing bed increased. Cells with 2.4 mm of beam diameter revealed better compression strength, whereas the 2.0 mm counterpart showed the highest specific elastic modulus. Originality/value The demand for lightweight solutions has driven the widespread adoption of AM for the realization of complex structures. MEX+D&S offers a viable alternative to the widely used laser-based technologies for the realization of metallic parts, thanks to their ease of use and lower costs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Foggia Department of Agricultural Sciences, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), , Foggia,
Polytechnic University of Bari Department of Mechanical Engineering Mathematics and Management, , Bari,
Funding
Italian Ministry of University and Research · Italian Ministry of University and Research funded by the European Union – NextGenerationEU
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Optimizing the specific mechanical properties of lattice structures fabricated by material extrusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.024 ↗
2. ASTM International · 200910.1520/E0009-09 ↗
3. Standard test methods for density of compacted or sintered powder metallurgy (PM) products using Archimedes10.1520/B0962-17.2 ↗
4. Local thickness optimization of functionally graded lattice structures in compression10.3390/app132312969 ↗
5. German · 1996
6. Additive manufacturing of metallic and ceramic components by the material extrusion of highly-filled polymers: a review and future perspectives10.3390/ma11050840 ↗
7. Physical-mechanical behaviors of stainless steel plate-lattice built by material extrusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117739 ↗
8. Creating metal parts by fused deposition modeling and sintering10.1016/j.matlet.2019.127252 ↗
9. Overview of debinding methods for parts manufactured using powder material extrusion10.1016/j.addma.2022.103335 ↗
10. SLM lattice structures: properties, performance, applications and challenges10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137 ↗
11. Next generation orthopaedic implants by additive manufacturing using electron beam melting10.1155/2012/245727 ↗
12. A new solution for assessing the printability of 17-4 PH gyroids produced via extrusion-based metal AM10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.043 ↗
13. Supportless lattice structure of 316L stainless steel fabricated by material extrusion additive manufacturing: effect of relative density on physical, microstructural and mechanical behaviour10.1016/j.msea.2024.147270 ↗
14. Shrinkage evaluation and geometric accuracy assessment on 17–4 PH samples made by material extrusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.12.031 ↗
15. Auxetic behavior of 3D-printed structure made in acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide10.1007/s40964-023-00465-0 ↗
16. Mechanical characterization and properties of laser-based powder bed-fused lattice structures: a review10.1007/s00170-021-06631-4/Published ↗
17. Dynamic properties of high structural integrity auxetic open cell foam10.1088/0964-1726/13/1/006 ↗
18. Mechanical characterisation of a periodic auxetic structure produced by SEBM10.1002/pssb.201084211 ↗
19. Supportless printing of lattice structures by metal fused filament fabrication (MF3) of Ti-6Al-4V: design and analysis10.1108/RPJ-01-2021-0015 ↗
20. Characterization of titanium lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting using an adapted compressive test method10.1007/s11340-015-0117-y ↗
21. Sustainability aspects of composite filament fabrication for 3D printing applications10.1016/j.rser.2023.113961 ↗
22. Fused filament fabrication of stainless steel structures – from binder development to sintered properties10.1016/j.addma.2021.102472 ↗
23. Effect of microstructure and printed pores on the adiabatic shearing behavior of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy manufactured by selective electron beam melting10.1016/j.matchar.2022.112642 ↗
24. Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly10.1038/nbt874 ↗
25. A review of defects in vat photopolymerization additive-manufactured ceramics: characterization, control, and challenges10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.10.067 ↗
26. Vibration tests of 3D printed satellite structure made of lattice sandwich panels10.2514/1.J057241 ↗