In-situ monitoring and correction of geometric deviations in material extrusion additive manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to address layer shifting in Material Extrusion (MEX) additive manufacturing, a representative defect that compromises part quality and efficiency. Unlike previous studies that focus only on error detection, this research develops a complete, real-time in-situ monitoring and correction system capable of detecting and correcting geometric deviations under different error scenarios. The system improves precision, reliability and sustainability in MEX processes by reducing failed prints and material waste while maintaining geometric integrity. Design/methodology/approach A single-camera system captured contour images at checkpoint layers, and image processing algorithms detect geometric deviations. A novel correction strategy balanced overcorrection and undercorrection, ensuring robust error recovery. The system’s effectiveness was validated through systematic testing across multiple error magnitudes and positions, confirming its adaptability and performance under various shifting conditions. While the initial validation was performed on a square geometry for its simplicity and efficiency in demonstrating the concept, the approach was designed to serve as a foundation for broader application to more complex cross-sectional contours in future studies. Findings The system provides a complete real-time solution for detecting and correcting layer shifting errors, a capability not previously achieved. The detection algorithm exhibited absolute errors from 0.01 mm to 0.97 mm, demonstrating great prediction accuracy. The correction strategy effectively preserved part geometry despite deliberately introduced errors. Although monitoring increased printing time by 36%, the tradeoff is justified given the reduction in machine downtime and material waste. Originality/value This study introduces a cost-effective, real-time monitoring and correction system for MEX, bridging a critical gap in quality assurance by providing both detection and correction across varied error conditions. The findings lay the foundation for self-correcting, high-precision MEX processes, with potential applications in aerospace and healthcare, where geometric accuracy is crucial. By enabling scalable in-situ monitoring and correction, this system supports broader industrial adoption of additive manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Taipei,
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Design consideration for additive manufacturing: fused deposition modelling10.4236/ojapps.2017.76024 ↗
2. Online error detection in additive manufacturing: a review10.1109/ICIEA52957.2021.9436729 ↗
3. Additive manufacturing materials, methods and applications: a review10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.379 ↗
4. The dimensional accuracy of plastic parts made by the fused filament fabrication10.1088/1757-899X/997/1/012021 ↗
5. Generalisable 3D printing error detection and correction via multi-head neural networks10.1038/s41467-022-31985-y ↗
6. The effect of process parameters on geometric deviations in 3D printing with fused deposition modelling10.1007/s00170-022-09924-4 ↗
7. The 17 united nations’ sustainable development goals: a status by 202010.1080/13504509.2021.1948456 ↗
8. Vision-based real-time monitoring of extrusion additive manufacturing processes for automatic manufacturing error detection10.1007/s00170-021-07419-2/Published ↗
9. Automated process monitoring in 3D printing using supervised machine learning10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.111 ↗
10. Projector calibration for pattern projection systems10.1016/S1665-6423(14)71608-6 ↗
11. Applications and multidisciplinary perspective on 3D printing techniques: recent developments and future trends10.1016/j.mser.2023.100760 ↗
12. Integration of additive manufacturing, parametric design, and optimization of parts obtained by fused deposition modeling (fdm). a methodological approach10.3390/polym12091993 ↗
13. Surface finish effects using coating method on 3D printing (FDM) parts10.1088/1757-899X/318/1/012065 ↗
14. In situ real time defect detection of 3D printed parts10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.003 ↗
15. Fault diagnosis of FDM process based on support vector machine (SVM)10.1108/RPJ-05-2019-0121 ↗
16. Autonomous in-situ correction of fused deposition modeling printers using computer vision and deep learning10.1016/j.mfglet.2019.09.005 ↗
17. Automated real-time detection and prediction of interlayer imperfections in additive manufacturing processes using artificial intelligence10.1002/aisy.201900130 ↗
18. 3d/4d printing of polymers: fused deposition modelling (fdm), selective laser sintering (sls), and stereolithography (sla)10.3390/polym13183101 ↗
19. Identification and overcoming key challenges in the 3D printing revolution10.1201/9781003306238-5 ↗
20. The accuracy and the printing resolution comparison of different 3D printing technologies10.2478/tar-2018-0023 ↗
21. In situ visual quality control in 3D printing10.5220/0009329803170324 ↗
22. Investigations of digital model using extraoral scanner, resin printing and fused deposition modelling to fabricate a dental arch model10.1109/ICCMSO59960.2023.00054 ↗
23. 3D printing technology for thermal application: a brief review10.37934/ARFMTS.83.2.8497 ↗
24. Potential for natural fiber reinforcement in pla polymer filaments for fused deposition modeling (fdm) additive manufacturing: a review10.3390/polym13091407 ↗
25. Improving precision of material extrusion 3D printing by in-situ monitoring & predicting 3D geometric deviation using conditional adversarial networks10.1016/j.addma.2020.101695 ↗
26. Modeling of the influence of input am parameters on dimensional error and form errors in pla parts printed with fff technology10.3390/polym13234152 ↗
27. FDM-based additive manufacturing of recycled thermoplastics and associated composites10.1007/s10163-022-01588-2 ↗
28. OpenCV: Camera calibration (2025), available at:https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/dc/dbb/tutorial_py_calibration.html (accessed17 May 2024).
29. OpenCV: Edge detection(Canny) (2025), available at:https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/da/d22/tutorial_py_canny.html (accessed19 May 2024).
30. OpenCV: goodfeaturesToTrack (2025), available at:https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/d4/d8c/tutorial_py_shi_tomasi.html (accessed13 February 2025).
31. OpenCV: Image blurring (2025), available at:https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/d4/d13/tutorial_py_filtering.html (accessed19 May 2024).
32. OpenCV: Template Matching (2025), available at:https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/da/d22/tutorial_py_canny.html (accessed19 May 2024).
33. A review article on FDM process parameters in 3D printing for composite materials10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.385 ↗
34. Open source computer vision-based layer-wise 3D printing analysis10.1016/j.addma.2020.101473 ↗
35. A short review on 3D printing methods, process parameters and materials10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.225 ↗
36. Comparing additive manufacturing processes for distributed manufacturing10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.603 ↗
37. A review on the various processing parameters in FDM10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484 ↗
38. Survey on camera calibration technique10.1109/IHMSC.2013.240 ↗
39. Template Match Modes (2025), available at:https://docs.opencv.org/3.4/df/dfb/group__imgproc__object.html#gga3a7850640f1fe1f58fe91a2d7583695daf9c3ab9296f597ea71f056399a5831da (accessed21 January 2025).
40. A dynamic model for nozzle clog monitoring in fused deposition modelling10.1108/RPJ-04-2016-0054 ↗
41. Performance analysis of canny and sobel edge detection algorithms in image mining
42. A camera calibration technique based on OpenCV
43. Automatic camera system calibration with a chessboard enabling full image coverage10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1715-2019 ↗
44. Filament breakage monitoring in fused deposition modeling using acoustic emission technique10.3390/s18030749 ↗
45. 3-D computer vision