journal article·2026-05-04

Machine learning-based parameter significance for wear performance and process–wear–sustainability correlations of 3D-printed polylactic acid

Wycliffe Musyoki Kyalo, Gaurav Maurya, Jai Singh

Publisher page

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between 3D printing input parameters and various output (target) variables such as wear, print time, printing cost and dimensional accuracy in both print and scan directions to show the order of parameter importance on each target variable and the overall order of feature importance across all target variables. Furthermore, to quantify the parameter-based sustainability and calculate the sustainability index (SI) (considering cost and CO2 emissions) by correlating the process, wear performance and sustainability. Design/methodology/approach This study uses machine learning (ML) to optimize process parameters in additive manufacturing (AM), focusing on wear resistance, accuracy, cost and printing time. A gradient boosting regressor is trained on experimental data to find relationships between parameters and performance. The wear performance was assessed by conducting sliding wear tests using a Pin-on-Disc tribometer, while sustainability was evaluated based on material cost and CO2 emissions. The connection between process parameters, wear and sustainability provides useful insights to make 3D printing more efficient and environmentally friendly. Findings The layer thickness was the overall most influencing process parameter affecting all the output variables studied. The solid infill pattern with 0.100 mm layer thickness consumed the maximum amount of material, took maximum printing time, consumed maximum electricity and was responsible for the highest amount of CO2 emissions and, hence, the least SI. The wear performance and the SI follow an opposite trend. The solid infill pattern with 0.200 mm layer thickness was found to be the most optimum case possessing the best wear performance in the most sustainable manner. Practical implications This study will help in decision-making for improved wear performance and setting the trade with sustainability of 3D-printed parts in various industries such as aerospace and healthcare. Social implications This study supports sustainable manufacturing, reduces environmental impact, enhances product reliability and promotes artificial intelligence-driven innovation in industries and education. Originality/value This study uniquely correlates process parameters with multiple objectives, namely, dimensional accuracy, printing time, material consumed and associated cost and wear performance, both individually and cumulatively, using ML. The process–wear–sustainability correlation is addressed for the first time.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Polymer Foaming and Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Bengaluru,

Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Bengaluru, , and Department of Multidisciplinary Unit of Research on Translational Initiatives (MURTI) Research Center, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management, Bengaluru, India

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Influence of 3D printing process parameters on the mechanical properties and mass of PLA parts and predictive models10.1108/RPJ-03-2020-0043 ↗
2. Investigation of material extrusion parameters and printing material impacts on wear and friction using the Taguchi method10.1108/RPJ-10-2024-0447 ↗
3. The rise of 3-D printing: the advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011 ↗
4. Optimization of fused filament fabrication for high-performance polylactic acid parts under wear conditions10.3390/lubricants12080281 ↗
5. 3-D printing: the new industrial revolution10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2011.11.003 ↗
6. Effect of printing parameters on dimensional error, surface roughness and porosity of FFF printed parts with grid structure10.3390/polym13081213 ↗
7. The influence of the process parameters on the mechanical properties of PLA specimens produced by fused filament fabrication—a review10.3390/POLYM14050886 ↗
8. Energy consumption and carbon footprint of 3D printing in pharmaceutical manufacture10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2023.122926 ↗
9. Relationship between FDM 3D printing parameters study: parameter optimization for lower defects10.3390/POLYM13132190 ↗
10. Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150 ↗
11. Global energy and CO2 status report 2019
12. Life cycle assessment of additive manufacturing processes: a review10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.05.007 ↗
13. Improving the strength properties of PLA acetabular liners by optimizing FDM 3D printing: Taguchi approach and finite element analysis validation10.1007/s00170-025-15314-3 ↗
14. Development of wear-resistant polymeric materials using fused deposition modelling (FDM) technologies: a review10.3390/lubricants13030098 ↗
15. Effects of printing layer thickness on mechanical properties of 3D-printed custom trays10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2020.08.025 ↗
16. Assessing the wear performance of 3D printed polylactic acid polymer parts10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.565 ↗
17. Modeling the producibility of 3D printing in polylactic acid using artificial neural networks and fused filament fabrication10.3390/polym13193219 ↗
18. Pivotal role of polylactide in carbon emission reduction: a comprehensive review10.1002/eng2.12909 ↗
19. Investigation and optimization of effects of 3D printer process parameters on performance parameters10.3390/ma16093392 ↗
20. Life cycle assessment of polylactic acid (PLA) in 3D printing applications: evaluating environmental impacts and energy consumption10.17577/IJERTV13IS080020 ↗
21. Effects of infill patterns on time, surface roughness and tensile strength in 3D printing
22. Process parameters influence on economic efficiency of 3D printing
23. Effect of infill density on mechanical properties of 3D printed product for fused deposition modeling process10.1063/5.0114750/2903663 ↗
24. How has LCA been applied to 3D printing? A systematic literature review and recommendations for future studies10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.118803 ↗
25. Influence of process parameters on mechanical strength, build time, and material consumption of 3D printed polylactic acid parts10.1002/pc.26849 ↗
26. Effects of 3D-printed PLA material with different filling densities on coefficient of friction performance10.1108/RPJ-03-2022-0081 ↗
27. Investigation of tribological properties of industrial products with different patterns produced by 3D printing using polylactic acid10.1108/RPJ-05-2024-0232 ↗
28. Multi-objective optimization of 3D printing process parameters using gray-based Taguchi for composite PLA parts10.1002/pc.28674 ↗
29. Predicting flexural strength of additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites using machine learning10.1115/1.4047477 ↗
30. Machine learning study of the effect of process parameters on tensile strength of FFF PLA and PLA-CF10.3390/eng4040156 ↗