On the strain-rate sensitivity of 3D-printed hyper-viscoelastic polymers
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose Additive manufacturing has promoted the use of polymeric materials with complex mechanical behavior, including thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPUs). These materials exhibit pronounced nonlinear and strain-rate-dependent responses that remain insufficiently characterized for constitutive modeling. This study aims to experimentally characterize the strain-rate-dependent tensile behavior of printable TPUs. It evaluates, adapts, and implements phenomenological constitutive models to describe their hyper-viscoelastic response over a relevant strain-rate range and demonstrates their applicability through finite-element implementation. Design/methodology/approach Uniaxial tensile tests were performed on three printable TPU grades (Shore 70A, 82A and 95A) at four nominal strain rates ranging from approximately 1.1 × 10-3 s-1 to 10-1 s-1. The experimental stress–strain data were used to assess two phenomenological modeling approaches: a modified Cowper–Symonds formulation incorporating strain-dependent rate sensitivity along the full stress–strain response and an integrated hyper-viscoelastic framework combining a third-order Ogden model with a Prony series to represent time-dependent effects. The integrated formulation was further implemented in a commercial finite element environment using a representative gait-related loading scenario. Findings Both modeling approaches reproduce the experimentally observed strain-rate-dependent stress–strain behavior with high accuracy within the investigated range. Residual analysis indicates that the modified Cowper–Symonds formulation yields low root-mean-square errors (RMSEs), with a maximum of approximately 0.21 MPa. In contrast, the integrated hyper-viscoelastic framework exhibits RMSE values below approximately 0.35 MPa. In all cases, the agreement between modeled and experimental responses is characterized by coefficients of determination (R²) exceeding 0.99. The remaining discrepancies are mainly due to limitations in the relaxation data and numerical integration effects, which become more pronounced at higher strain rates. Finite element simulations slightly overestimate experimental stress levels, consistent with the reported RMSE values and attributable to differences in adequate integration time. Originality/value This study contributes to the analytical and numerical modeling of 3D-printed TPUs and other compliant, printable polymers by establishing an experimentally grounded framework for selecting, adapting, and implementing constitutive models. Validated hyperelastic and viscoelastic descriptions are systematically integrated with strain-rate-dependent experimental data and finite element simulations, enhancing the predictive reliability of TPU-based designs and supporting their application in advanced structural and biomechanical contexts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Elasticity and Material Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
San Diego State University Experimental Mechanics Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, , San Diego, ,
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Madrid,
Funding
Dirección General de Universidades e Investigación · National Science Foundation · U.S. Department of Defense · U.S. Department of Navy
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Comprehensive structural evaluation of composite materials in 3D-printed shin guards10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.11.131 ↗
2. A modified Johnson–Cook model for the plastic behavior of metals in ultrasonic vibration-assisted upsetting processes10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.05.027 ↗
3. Bakır · 2021 · 10710.1007/978-3-030-68024-4_6 ↗
4. A finite volume method for incompressible linear elasticity10.1016/j.cma.2006.01.005 ↗
5. Modeling the fracture behavior of 3D-printed PLA as a laminate composite: influence of printing parameters on failure and mechanical properties10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117379 ↗
6. A novel bio-inspired helmet with auxetic lattice liners for mitigating traumatic brain injury10.1088/1361-665X/acf62e ↗
7. Cowper · 195710.21236/AD0144762 ↗
8. Predicting failure modes of 3D-printed multi-material polymer sandwich structures from process parameters10.1177/10996362211020445 ↗
9. Determination of flexural properties of hybrid composite using Cowper10.1177/00219983211038626 ↗
10. Terminology for additive manufacturing-general principles-terminology
11. Characterization of TPU-elastomers by thermal analysis (DSC)10.1016/j.polymertesting.2003.09.013 ↗
12. Mechanical performance of 3D-printed TPU auxetic structures for energy absorption applications10.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.108669 ↗
13. A three-dimensional fractional visco-hyperelastic model for soft materials10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105564 ↗
14. A continuum constitutive model for FDM 3D printed thermoplastics10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108373 ↗
15. Effect of printing temperature on mechanical and viscoelastic properties of ultra-flexible thermoplastic polyurethane in material extrusion additive manufacturing10.1007/s11665-021-06510-9 ↗
16. A comparative study of 85 hyperelastic constitutive models for both unfilled rubber and highly filled rubber nanocomposite material10.1016/j.nanoms.2021.07.003 ↗
17. A computational determination of the Cowper–Symonds parameters from a single Taylor test10.1016/j.apm.2012.10.010 ↗
18. 3D printed elastomeric polyurethane: viscoelastic experimental characterizations and constitutive modelling with nonlinear viscosity functions10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.103546 ↗
19. A constitutive model for 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced composite structures with variable fiber content10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107893 ↗
20. Vat photopolymerization 3D printing of glass microballoon-reinforced TPMS meta-structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111799 ↗
21. Modified hyper-viscoelastic damage evolution constitutive model for polyurethane materials – an experimental and numerical investigation10.1080/15376494.2023.2182006 ↗
22. A review on Johnson Cook material model10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.279 ↗
23. Lakes · 200910.1017/CBO9780511626722 ↗
24. Mechanical characterization and computational analysis of TPU 60A: integrating experimental testing and simulation for performance optimization10.3390/ma18020240 ↗
25. Desktop printing of 3D thermoplastic polyurethane parts with enhanced mechanical performance using filaments with varying stiffness10.1016/j.addma.2021.102267 ↗
26. Estimate of gait speed by using persons’ walk ratio or step-frequency in older adults10.1007/s40520-021-01832-z ↗
27. Effect of strain rate on dynamic responses of laterally impacted steel plates10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.06.034 ↗
28. Anisotropic and hyperelastic mechanical response of 3D printed TPU parts10.1007/s40964-024-00937-x ↗
29. Prediction of in-plane stiffness of multi-material 3D printed laminate parts fabricated by FDM process using CLT and its mechanical behaviour under tensile load10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.100955 ↗
30. 3D printed polyurethane exhibits isotropic elastic behavior despite its anisotropic surface10.1108/RPJ-02-2019-0027 ↗
31. Perry · 2024 · 45710.1201/9781003525592-28 ↗
32. Simulations for mechanical properties of polymer composites: investigations into suitability of numerical models for TPU-CNT with Mooney–Rivlin ($N = 1$) and friction10.1007/s11043-022-09565-w ↗
33. Experimental investigation on the tensile behavior of polyurea at high strain rates10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.063 ↗
34. Experimental characterization and constitutive modeling of thermoplastic polyurethane under complex uniaxial loading10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105582 ↗
35. A micromechanical approach to TPU mechanical properties: framework and experimental validation10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104627 ↗
36. Simulia (2025a), “Abaqus analysis user’s guide. Dassault systèmes. Accedido: 30 de Marzo de”, [En línea], available at:Link to the cited article.
37. Simulia (2025b), “Abaqus theory guide. Dassault systèmes. Accedido: 30 de Marzo de”, available at:Link to the cited article.
38. Full-field characterizations of additively manufactured composite cellular structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111208 ↗
39. Comparative characterization of the viscoelastic properties of additive manufacturing polymers10.1007/s11043-024-09710-7 ↗
40. Structural performance of additively manufactured composite lattice structures: strain rate, cell geometry, and weight ratio effects10.1002/adem.202301431 ↗
41. Computational modeling of constitutive behaviour of 3D printed composite structures10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.030 ↗
42. Structure and mechanical properties of an injection-molded thermoplastic polyurethane as a function of melt temperature10.1002/macp.201100193 ↗
43. Design for additive manufacturing: trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004 ↗
44. Rate-dependent energy dissipation of graded viscoelastic structures fabricated by grayscale vat photopolymerization10.1088/1361-665X/ad442a ↗
45. Simplification of hyperelastic constitutive model and finite element analysis of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers10.1002/mats.202000009 ↗
46. Mechanical characterization and constitutive modeling of visco-hyperelasticity of photocured polymers10.1016/j.addma.2020.101511 ↗
47. Measurement of nonlinear Poisson’s ratio of thermoplastic polyurethanes under cyclic softening using 2D digital image correlation10.3390/polym13091498 ↗
48. The laser selective sintering controlled forming of flexible TPMS structures10.3390/ma16247565 ↗
49. Youssef · 202210.1016/B978-0-12-821078-9.09993-2 ↗
50. 3D auxetic metamaterials with tunable multistable mechanical properties10.1016/j.mechmat.2024.105217 ↗
51. Failure analysis of 3D printed woven composite plates with holes under tensile and shear loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107835 ↗
52. Efficacy of auxetic lattice structured shoe sole in advancing footwear comfort–from the perspective of plantar pressure and contact area10.3389/fpubh.2024.1412518 ↗
53. Comprehensive constitutive modeling and analysis of multi-elastic polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) for wearable device simulations10.1038/s41598-023-45372-0 ↗