Dimensional analysis of 3D-printed acetabular cups for hip arthroplasty using X-ray microcomputed tomography
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose Three-dimensional (3D) printing is increasingly used to produce orthopaedic components for hip arthroplasty, such as acetabular cups, which show complex lattice porous structures and shapes. However, limitations on the quality of the final implants are present; thus, investigations are needed to ensure adequate quality and patients safety. X-ray microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) has been recognised to be the most suitable method to evaluate the complexity of 3D-printed parts. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of a micro-CT analysis method comparing it with reference systems, such as coordinate measuring machine and electron microscopy. Design/methodology/approach 3D-printed acetabular components for hip arthroplasty (n = 2) were investigated. Dimensions related to the dense and porous regions of the samples were measured. The micro-CT scanning parameters (voltage – kV, current – µA) were optimised selecting six combinations of beam voltage and current. Findings Micro-CT showed good correlation and agreement with both coordinate measuring machine and scanning electron microscopy when optimal scanning parameters were selected (130 kV – 100 µA to 180 kV – 80 µA). Mean discrepancies of 50 µm (± 300) and 20 µm (± 60) were found between the techniques for dense and porous dimensions. Investigation method such as micro-CT imaging may help to better understand the impact of 3D printing manufacturing technology on the properties of orthopaedic implants. Originality/value The optimisation of the scanning parameters and the validation of this method with reference techniques may guide further analysis of similar orthopaedic components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University College London Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, , Stanmore,
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
University College London Electrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, , London,
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM E1570-11 (2011), Standard Practice for Computed Tomographic (CT) Examination, doi: 10.1520/E1570-11.2.
2. Direct visualization and quantification of bone growth into porous titanium implants using micro computed tomography
3. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies10.1177/096228029900800204 ↗
4. 3D printed acetabular cups for total hip arthroplasty: a review article10.3390/met9070729 ↗
5. Quality control of a laser additive manufactured medical implant by X-Ray tomography10.1089/3dp.2016.0012 ↗
6. X-Ray microcomputed tomography in additive manufacturing: a review of the current technology and applications10.1089/3dp.2018.0060 ↗
7. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001 ↗
8. Cellular Ti-6Al-4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting10.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.013 ↗
9. A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.1340694.x ↗
10. Compression-compression fatigue of selective electron beam melted cellular titanium (Ti-6Al-4V)10.1002/jbm.b.31901 ↗
11. ISO 15708-2:2017, Non-Destructive testing — radiation methods for computed tomography — part 2: principles, equipment and samples
12. Computed tomography metrological examination of additive manufactured acetabular hip prosthesis cups10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.033 ↗
13. Computed tomography for dimensional metrology10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.006 ↗
14. Surface texture evaluation of additively manufactured metallic cellular scaffolds for acetabular implants using X-ray computed tomography10.1007/s42242-019-00042-x ↗
15. Characterization of cellular solids in Ti6Al4V for orthopaedic implant applications: trabecular titanium10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.02.001 ↗
16. Additive manufacturing10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-0662.R2 ↗
17. Additive manufacturing of biomedical devices: an overview10.1080/10667857.2017.1389052 ↗
18. Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V produced by rapid-layer manufacturing, for biomedical applications10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.05.004 ↗
19. A technique for evaluating bone ingrowth into 3D printed, porous Ti6Al4V implants accurately using X-ray micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry10.1016/j.micron.2016.11.009 ↗
20. Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM)10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.10.006 ↗
21. Comparison of different additive manufacturing methods using computed tomography10.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.008 ↗
22. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: an in vivo experiment10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 ↗
23. X-ray computed tomography for additive manufacturing: a review10.1088/0957-0233/27/7/072001 ↗
24. Micro-CT-based improvement of geometrical and mechanical controllability of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V porous structures10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.045 ↗
25. Dimensional metrology with X-ray CT: a comparison with CMM measurements on internal features and compliant structures10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.08.021 ↗