journal article·2026-05-27

Explainable machine learning for high-strain-rate prediction of LPBF-fabricated A286 lattice structures under SHPB testing

Veera Siva Reddy Bobbili, Chandrasekhara Sastry C, Hafeezur Rahman A

Rapid Prototyping Journal· Volume 32· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to establish an interpretable machine learning framework for predicting high-strain-rate mechanical responses of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)-fabricated A286 steel lattice structures subjected to split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. By integrating multi-output regression with explainable AI (XAI) tools, the research seeks to quantify the influence of impact pressure and lattice topology on key dynamic response metrics. The objective is to develop accurate, physics-aligned predictive models that can inform data-driven lattice design strategies for impact-resistant applications in aerospace and defence. Design/methodology/approach Three lattice topologies: body-centred cubic (BCC), honeycomb and gyroid were additively manufactured and subjected to SHPB testing under dynamic pressures ranging from 2–7 bar. Key response variables, including peak stress, maximum strain, maximum strain rate and energy absorbed, were extracted. Multi-output regression was performed using CatBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting and Extra Trees algorithms, with impact pressure and lattice type as input features. Findings The CatBoost model yielded the highest accuracy for peak stress prediction (R² = 0.9848), XGBoost for maximum strain (R² = 0.9877), Gradient Boosting for strain rate (R² = 0.9659) and Random Forest for energy absorption (R² = 0.9839). Shapley additive explanations analysis revealed nonlinear interactions between impact pressure and lattice type, particularly beyond 6 bar. Surrogate trees and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations identified interpretable design rules, such as BCC lattices at ≥6 bar leading to optimal energy absorption. The integrated framework provided transparent and high-fidelity predictions with strong alignment to physical deformation mechanisms observed during dynamic testing. Research limitations/implications The primary limitation of this study lies in the relatively small dataset size due to experimental constraints of SHPB testing and LPBF fabrication cycles. While the models demonstrate high predictive accuracy and explainability, their generalizability to other alloys, lattice topologies, or loading regimes remains to be validated. Additionally, the current framework does not account for temperature effects, anisotropy, or microstructural evolution during impact. Future research should focus on expanding the dataset, incorporating microstructural inputs and applying the framework to broader materials and geometries for more robust and transferable design guidance. Practical implications The interpretable machine learning framework developed in this study provides engineers and designers with predictive tools to optimize lattice geometries for high-strain-rate applications. The identified pressure–geometry performance thresholds and extracted surrogate rules can directly inform the design of energy-absorbing components in aerospace, automotive and defence systems. By offering a transparent model architecture with feature attributions, the approach enables accelerated design iteration, risk mitigation and enhanced material performance under dynamic loading, reducing reliance on exhaustive physical prototyping. The framework is modular and can be adapted to new materials and use-cases with minimal customization. Social implications Improving the impact resilience of structural components using data-driven lattice design can contribute to safer transportation, aerospace and defence systems. The ability to design energy-absorbing structures with minimal weight enhances fuel efficiency and reduces environmental impact. Furthermore, the integration of XAI into materials engineering promotes ethical and trustworthy adoption of machine learning in critical industries, ensuring that decisions are transparent and grounded in physical behaviour. The methodology fosters knowledge democratization by enabling domain experts, not just data scientists, to interpret and act upon model insights in socially impactful applications. Originality/value This is the first study to apply a comprehensive, explainable machine learning approach for high-strain-rate prediction of LPBF-fabricated A286 lattice structures using SHPB data. Unlike prior black-box models, this framework emphasizes interpretability through XAI, providing actionable design insights rooted in physics. It establishes practical thresholds for impact mitigation and identifies geometry–pressure interactions that influence energy dissipation. The findings support the development of AI-informed lattice design guidelines for protective structures, marking a significant advancement in the deployment of interpretable AI for additive manufacturing in defence and aerospace contexts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Cellular and Composite Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing Kurnool (IIITDM Kurnool) Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Kurnool,

Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing Kurnool (IIITDM Kurnool) Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Kurnool, , and Combat Vehicles Research and Development Establishment (CVRDE), DRDO, Chennai, India

Funding

Armament Research Board · MeitY

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and machine learning technique for prediction of properties in additive manufacturing10.1142/S0219686725500118 ↗
2. LPBF manufactured functionally graded lattice structures obtained by graded density and hybrid Poisson’s ratio10.3390/ma15124072 ↗
3. Physics-informed neural networks for predicting high-strain-rate energy absorption in additively manufactured lattice materials10.1007/s40964-025-01460-3 ↗
4. Explainable artificial intelligence for automatic defect detection in additively manufactured parts using CT scan analysis10.1007/s10845-023-02272-4 ↗
5. Application of machine learning methods on dynamic strength analysis for additive manufactured polypropylene-based composites10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107580 ↗
6. Interpretable and explainable AI (XAI) model for spatial drought prediction10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149797 ↗
7. Explainable AI in the context of predictive process monitoring: an empirical analysis framework10.3390/a15060199 ↗
8. Anisotropic dynamic compression response of an ultra-high strength steel fabricated by laser hybrid additive manufacturing10.1016/j.addma.2024.104186 ↗
9. Dynamic behaviors and microstructure evolution of iron–nickel based ultra-high strength steel by SHPB testing10.3390/met10010062 ↗
10. Layer-wise emission prediction for laser powder bed fusion with an attribution-based explainable deep learning model10.1115/1.4068937 ↗
11. XAI for intrusion detection system: comparing explanations based on global and local scope10.1007/s11416-022-00441-2 ↗
12. Explainable AI for forensic analysis: a comparative study of SHAP and LIME in intrusion detection models10.3390/app15137329 ↗
13. Explainable AI techniques for comprehensive analysis of the relationship between process parameters and material properties in FDM-based 3D-printed biocomposites10.3390/jmmp8040171 ↗
14. Hybrid experimental and AI-Driven microstructural and residual stress evaluation of laser powder bed Fusion-Fabricated IN718 and A286 steel versus rolled armor steels10.1007/s11665-025-12870-3 ↗
15. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for material design and engineering applications: a quantitative computational framework10.1002/msd2.70017 ↗
16. Introducing explainable artificial intelligence to property prediction in metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.138 ↗
17. A multi-objective optimization design to generate surrogate machine learning models in explainable artificial intelligence applications10.1016/j.ejdp.2023.100040 ↗
18. Interpretable and explainable machine learning for materials science and chemistry10.1021/accountsmr.1c00244 ↗
19. Panda · 2024 · 8910.1201/9781003442509-6 ↗
20. Towards explicable AI in systemic identification of surrogate models of manufacturing processes
21. Investigation of energy absorption and deformation behaviour of novel nested hybrid lattice structure during uniaxial compression under high-strain-rate loading in multiple directions10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.05.175 ↗
22. A surrogate approach to explainable AI for predictive maintenance: techniques and applications10.1109/I4C62240.2024.10748524 ↗
23. Surface morphology, compressive behavior, and energy absorption of graded triply periodic minimal surface 316L steel cellular structures fabricated by laser powder bed fusion10.3390/ma15238294 ↗
24. Comparative analysis of metallic honeycomb and bcc micro lattice structures for armoured fighting vehicles10.1007/s12206-025-0228-z ↗
25. Machine learning-based prediction of high-strain-rate response in additively manufactured lattice structures using split hopkinson pressure bar experiments10.1002/adem.202501406 ↗
26. Machine learning approaches for predicting mechanical properties in additive manufactured lattice structures10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109937 ↗
27. Performance evaluation of machine learning techniques in surface roughness prediction for 3D printed micro-lattice structures10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.01.082 ↗
28. Performance evaluation of metallic honeycomb and gyroid micro-lattice structures for armoured fighting vehicles10.1007/s12666-023-03146-2 ↗
29. A review of explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare10.1080/00207543.2025.2513574 ↗
30. A perspective on explainable artificial intelligence methods: SHAP and LIME10.1002/aisy.202400304 ↗
31. Investigation of additive manufactured micro-lattice structures for defence applications10.2478/msp-2023-0023 ↗
32. Enhanced underbelly protection for armored vehicles using laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of micro-lattice structures10.1007/s11665-025-11455-4 ↗
33. Performance evaluation of machine learning techniques in surface morphology and corrosion prediction for A286 3D printed micro-lattice structures10.1371/journal.pone.0320565 ↗
34. Fooling LIME and SHAP: adversarial attacks on post hoc explanation methods10.1145/3375627.3375830 ↗
35. Precipitate evolution and mechanical properties of Si-modified A286 alloy aged at 510°C10.1016/j.msea.2024.146478 ↗
36. Biomimetic lattice structures design and manufacturing for high stress, deformation, and energy absorption performance10.3390/biomimetics10070458 ↗
37. LPBF-produced elastomeric lattice structures for personal protection equipment: mechanical performance versus comfort-related attributes10.3390/jmmp9060182 ↗
38. A review of machine learning (ML) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods in additive manufacturing (3D printing)10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110294 ↗
39. Comparative analysis of deep learning models for surface roughness prediction in additively manufactured honeycomb lattices10.1007/s11665-025-12130-4 ↗
40. High-strain-rate response and microstructural evolution of additively manufactured A286 steel lattice structures: a multiscale experimental investigation10.1002/adem.202501983 ↗
41. Superior strength and energy absorption capability of LPBF metallic functionally graded lattice structures10.1016/j.tws.2024.112471 ↗
42. Review on lattice structures for energy absorption properties10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116397 ↗
43. Explainable machine learning in materials science10.1038/s41524-022-00884-7 ↗
44. Comparative study on dynamic mechanical properties of additive manufacturing high strength steel and wrought high strength steel under high strain rate10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.04.005 ↗
45. Eco-friendly 3D printed concrete with fine aggregate replacements: fabrication, characterization and machine learning prediction10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134905 ↗