journal article·2024-11-18

A response surface methodology investigation into the optimization of manufacturing time and quality for FFF 3D printed PLA parts

Abdurrahim Temiz

Rapid Prototyping Journal· Volume 30· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the impact of specific printing factors, such as layer height, line width and build orientation, on the overall quality of fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printed structures. The project also intends to use response surface methodology (RSM) to maximize ultimate tensile strength (UTS) while lowering surface roughness and printing time. Design/methodology/approach This study used an FFF printer to fabricate samples of polylactic acid (PLA), which were then subjected to assessments of tensile strength and surface roughness. A tensile test was conducted under standardized conditions according to the ASTM D638 standard test method using the AG-50 kN Shimadzu Autograph. The Mitutoyo Surftest SJ-210, which utilizes a needle-tipped inductive method, was used to determine surface roughness. RSM was used for optimization. Findings This work provides useful insights into how the printing parameters affect FFF 3D printed structures, which may be used to optimize the printing process and improve PLA-based 3D printed products' qualities. The determined optimal values for building orientation, layer height and line width were 0°, 0.1 mm and 0.6 mm, respectively. The total desirability value of 0.80 implies desirable outcomes, and good agreement between experimental and projected response values supports the suggested models. Originality/value Previous RSM studies for 3D printing parameter optimization focused on mechanical properties or surface aspects, however, few examined multiple responses and their interactions. This study emphasizes the relevance of FFF parameters like line width, which are often overlooked but can dramatically impact printing quality. Mechanical properties, surface quality and printing time are integrated to comprehend optimization holistically.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Mixed-mode tensile/shear fracture of the additively manufactured components under dynamic and static loads10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108185 ↗
2. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics10.1520/D0638-14 ↗
3. The impact of infill percentage and layer height in small-scale material extrusion on porosity and tensile properties10.1016/j.addma.2022.103063 ↗
4. Analysis of AM parameters on surface roughness obtained in PLA parts printed with FFF technology10.3390/polym13142384 ↗
5. Analysing the effects of layer heights and line widths on FFF-printed thermoplastics10.1007/s00170-022-09810-z ↗
6. Investigating the effects of ironing parameters on the dimensional accuracy, surface roughness, and hardness of FFF-Printed thermoplastics10.3390/jcs6050121 ↗
7. Effect of nozzle diameter on mechanical and geometric performance of 3D printed carbon fibre-reinforced composites manufactured by fused filament fabrication10.1108/RPJ-10-2020-0250 ↗
8. An assessment of the dimensional accuracy and geometry-resolution limit of desktop stereolithography using response surface methodology10.1108/RPJ-03-2019-0060 ↗
9. Evaluation of effect and optimizing of process parameters for fused deposition modeling parts on tensile properties via Taguchi method10.1108/RPJ-06-2022-0201 ↗
10. The investigation of printing parameters effect on tensile characteristics for triply periodic minimal surface designs by Taguchi10.1002/pen.26608 ↗
11. A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics10.3390/jmmp3030064 ↗
12. Effect of build orientation on mechanical behaviour and build time of FDM 3D-Printed PLA parts: an experimental investigation10.26701/ems.881254 ↗
13. Analysis of PLA geometric properties processed by FFF additive manufacturing: effects of process parameters and plate-extruder precision motion10.3390/polym11101581 ↗
14. A study of tensile and bending properties of 3D-printed biocompatible materials used in dental appliances10.1007/s10853-021-06811-3 ↗
15. Production and 3D printing processing of bio-based thermoplastic filament10.1051/mfreview/2016020 ↗
16. 3D printed poly(lactic acid)-based nanocomposite scaffolds with bioactive coatings for tissue engineering applications10.1007/s10853-023-08149-4 ↗
17. A comprehensive review on surface quality improvement methods for additively manufactured parts10.1108/RPJ-06-2021-0133 ↗
18. Investigation of tensile property-based Taguchi method of PLA parts fabricated by FDM 3D printing technology10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100264 ↗
19. An overview of fused deposition modelling (FDM): research, development and process optimisation10.1108/RPJ-08-2019-0230 ↗
20. An investigation to study the combined effect of different infill pattern and infill density on the impact strength of 3D printed polylactic acid parts10.1016/j.coco.2020.100605 ↗
21. Statistical and experimental analysis of process parameters of 3D nylon printed parts by fused deposition modeling: response surface modeling and optimization10.1007/s11665-021-05848-4 ↗
22. Optimization of biocorrosion resistance and mechanical properties of PM Ti–XAl–2Fe–3Cu alloys by response surface methodology10.1007/s10853-022-07768-7 ↗
23. Effect of layer thickness on flexural properties of PLA (PolyLactid acid) by 3D printing10.1088/1742-6596/1130/1/012017 ↗
24. An investigation on failure behaviour of bonded polylactic acid adherends produced by 3D printing process: experimental and numerical approach10.1007/s40430-023-04321-8 ↗
25. Effect of fiber content and plasticizer on mechanical and joint properties of carbon fiber powder reinforced PLA manufactured by 3D printing process10.1080/01694243.2022.2121195 ↗
26. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 ↗
27. Effects of environmental conditions, aging, and build orientations on the mechanical properties of ASTM type I specimens manufactured via stereolithography10.1108/13552541211250373 ↗
28. Investigation of influence of printing parameters on the quality of 3D printed composite structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115061 ↗
29. Determination of a diesel engine operating parameters powered with canola, safflower and waste vegetable oil based biodiesel combination using response surface methodology (RSM)10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117496 ↗
30. Proportional impact prediction model of animal waste fat-derived biodiesel by ANN and RSM technique for diesel engine10.1016/j.energy.2021.122389 ↗
31. Effect of filling percentage and raster style on tensile behavior of FDM produced PLA parts at different build orientation10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.444 ↗
32. Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.051 ↗
33. Prediction of tensile strength in FDM printed ABS parts using response surface methodology (RSM)10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.788 ↗
34. Mechanical properties of 3D printed polylactic acid product for various infill design parameters: a review10.1088/1742-6596/1569/4/042010 ↗
35. The effects of process parameters on tensile characteristics and printing time for masked stereolithography components, analyzed using the response surface method10.1007/s11665-023-08617-7 ↗
36. An approach for mechanical property optimization of fused deposition modeling with polylactic acid via design of experiments10.1108/RPJ-07-2014-0083 ↗
37. Impact absorption capacity of 3D-printed components fabricated by fused deposition modelling10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.154 ↗
38. Experimental study of surface roughness, dimensional accuracy and time of fabrication of parts produced by fused deposition modelling10.1108/RPJ-12-2019-0315 ↗
39. Quadratic RSM models of processing parameters for three-layer oriented flakeboards
40. Effects of fused deposition modeling process parameters on tensile, dynamic mechanical properties of 3D printed polylactic acid materials10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106483 ↗
41. Using response surface methodology to optimize the stereolithography process10.1108/13552540610652401 ↗
42. Manufacturing and performance of 3D printed plastic tools for air bending applications10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.045 ↗
43. Exploiting limitations of fused deposition modeling to enhance mixing in 3D printed microfluidic devices10.1108/RPJ-03-2021-0051 ↗