journal article·2014-05

The use of a polycaprolactone–tricalcium phosphate scaffold for bone regeneration of tooth socket facial wall defects and simultaneous immediate dental implant placement in Macaca fascicularis

Bee Tin Goh, Nattharee Chanchareonsook, Henk Tideman, Swee Hin Teoh, James Kwok Fai Chow, John A. Jansen

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Bone regeneration and aesthetic outcomes may be compromised when immediate implants are placed at extraction sites with dehiscence defects. The aim of this study was to compare, in a monkey model, peri‐implant bone regeneration and implant stability after immediate implant placement into tooth sockets with facial wall defects in two treatment groups. In eight control monkeys, the bony defect was reconstructed with autogenous particulate bone, whereas in 10 test monkeys a polycaprolactone–tricalcium phosphate (PCL–TCP) scaffold was used. The monkeys were sacrificed after 6 months and the specimens were analyzed by histology and histomorphometry. Better maintenance of facial bone contour was noted in the test group; however, bone regeneration was seen only at areas adjacent to a bony wall of the defect. The mean bone‐to‐implant contact was 27.6 ± 19.1% (control group) versus 6.8 ± 7.9% (test group). The mean bone area percentage was 11.8 ± 10.1% (control group) versus 6.8 ± 6.9% (test group). Implant survival was 100% at 6 months for both the groups. It was concluded that although the use of a PCL–TCP scaffold showed better maintenance of the alveolar contour as compared to autogenous particulate bone at 6 months, there was minimal bone regeneration within the defect. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 102A: 1379–1388, 2014.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery National Dental Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery University of Hong Kong Hong Kong

Division of Bioengineering, School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Branemark Osseointegration Centre Hong Kong

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Tideman Maxillofacial Centre Hong Kong

Department of Periodontology and Biomaterials Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre The Netherlands

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. The Tubingen immediate implant in clinical studies
2. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate, immediate‐delayed and delayed implants)
3. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages
4. Immediate fixture placement: A treatment planning alternative
5. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: Review of biologic basis, clinical procedures and outcomes
6. 10.1902/jop.2002.73.7.75410.1902/jop.2002.73.7.754 ↗
7. Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: A prospective clinical study
8. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140201.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140201.x ↗
9. 10.1902/jop.1994.65.12.112810.1902/jop.1994.65.12.1128 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01093.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01093.x ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.00610.1016/j.joms.2007.04.006 ↗
12. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites
13. 10.1016/0142-9612(81)90060-010.1016/0142-9612(81)90060-0 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0002-9378(89)80015-810.1016/S0002-9378(89)80015-8 ↗
15. 10.1016/0142-9612(95)93577-Z10.1016/0142-9612(95)93577-Z ↗
16. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000193533.54580.3F10.1227/01.NEU.0000193533.54580.3F ↗
17. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00232-010.1016/S0142-9612(01)00232-0 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.00710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.007 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.07.00210.1016/j.jconrel.2005.07.002 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.00610.1016/j.msec.2006.05.006 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.03210.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.032 ↗
23. 10.1002/term.2410.1002/term.24 ↗
24. 10.1002/jbm.a.3145410.1002/jbm.a.31454 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.02610.1016/j.joms.2006.11.026 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.a.3114210.1002/jbm.a.31142 ↗
27. 10.1002/jbm.a.3205210.1002/jbm.a.32052 ↗
28. 10.3109/0894193940901535610.3109/08941939409015356 ↗
29. 10.1177/0022034578057007130110.1177/00220345780570071301 ↗
30. Alveolar ridge repair using resorbable membranes and autogenous bone particles with simultaneous placement of implants: An experimental pilot study in dogs
31. The osteogenic phases of regeneration of bone: A historical and experimental study10.2106/00004623-195638030-00009 ↗
32. 10.1177/15440591030820111110.1177/154405910308201111 ↗