journal article·2026-06-29

Investigation of energy absorption for 3D printed auxetic tubular structures

Talal Almalki, Mahmoud Azzahrani, Ghazi Alsoruji, Muhammad Basha, Ramzi Othman

Publisher page

Abstract

Purpose With the growing demand for sustainable and optimized designs, three-dimensional (3D)-printed structures have gained increasing prominence in engineering applications, particularly because of their enhanced mechanical performance in energy absorption. This study aims to experimentally characterize and compare the energy absorption behavior of three auxetic cylindrical 3D-printed structures. Design/methodology/approach Three distinct 3D-printed structures were developed: two axisymmetric auxetic structures (RA1 and R2A) with re-entrant (2D) auxetic geometries and a third structure (R1NA) with periodicity in both axial and radial directions, exhibiting a fully 3D re-entrant auxetic form. All structures were fabricated using fused deposition modeling with polylactic acid. Their mechanical performance was evaluated through experimental characterization, focusing on key energy absorption metrics, including specific energy absorption and crush force efficiency. Findings The experimental results demonstrated that the two axisymmetric auxetic structures exhibited significantly higher specific energy absorption and CFE compared to the lattice structure. Their superior performance is primarily attributed to a more efficient crushing phase characterized by a nearly constant crushing force. Originality/value This study provides novel insights into the mechanical behavior of cylindrical re-entrant structures under compression. The findings of this study contribute to the advancement of lightweight energy-absorbing structures by demonstrating the advantages of auxetic geometries over conventional lattice designs. These results have potential applications in engineering fields requiring enhanced energy absorption capabilities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Polymer Foaming and Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

King Abdulaziz University Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, , Jeddah,

Ecole Centrale de Nantes, Institut de Recherche en Génie Civil et Mécanique , Nantes,

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Auxetic materials10.1243/09544100JAERO185 ↗
2. Investigation of the effect of corrugated structure on crashing performance in Thin-Walled circular crash boxes
3. On the influence of different infill pattern structures on the crashworthiness performance of 3D printed tubes subjected to lateral loading condition10.1007/s12221-024-00756-5 ↗
4. Effects of printing parameters on the properties of 316L stainless steel fabricated by fused filament fabrication10.1108/RPJ-08-2024-0356 ↗
5. Enhanced mechanical properties of re-entrant auxetic honeycomb with self-similar inclusion10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.117921 ↗
6. In-plane energy absorption characteristics of a modified re-entrant auxetic structure fabricated via 3D printing10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109437 ↗
7. Enhanced energy absorption performance of 3D printed 2D auxetic lattices10.1016/j.tws.2023.110650 ↗
8. Influence of extruder’s nozzle diameter on the improvement of functional properties of 3D-Printed PLA products10.3390/polym14020356 ↗
9. Specific energy absorption during compression testing of ABS and FPU parts fabricated using LCD-SLA based 3D printer10.1108/RPJ-04-2021-0075 ↗
10. Optimization of energy absorption in bio-inspired cylindrical lattice structures: an experimental investigation with Box–Behnken design10.1108/RPJ-03-2025-0117 ↗
11. Crushing performance of auxetic tubesunder quasi-static and impact loading10.1007/s40430-022-03539-2 ↗
12. Characterization and modeling of the strain rate sensitivity of polyetheretherketone’s compressive yield stress10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.080 ↗
13. Tensile behavior of polyetheretherketone over a wide range of strain rates10.1155/2015/275937 ↗
14. Strain rate sensitivity of polyetheretherketone’s compressive yield stress at low and high temperatures10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.12.008 ↗
15. Auxetic materials: functional materials and structures from lateral thinking10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
16. Characterization and mechanical properties of PLA/acetylated cellulose nanocrystals composites for dental crown prototype application10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103903 ↗
17. Using finite element approach for crashworthiness assessment of a polymeric auxetic structure subjected to the axial loading10.3390/polym12061312 ↗
18. Multi-objective design optimization of reentrant auxetic model using Lichtenberg algorithm based on metamodel10.1108/EC-07-2022-0448 ↗
19. Effects of key process parameters on tensile properties and interlayer bonding behavior of 3D printed PLA using fused filament fabrication10.1007/s40964-024-00704-y ↗
20. Dynamic compressive and flexural behaviour of Re-Entrant auxetics: a numerical study10.3390/ma16155219 ↗
21. Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization for an auxetic cylindrical structure under axial impact loading10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.063 ↗
22. Multimaterial 3D printing of auxetic jounce bumpers for automotive suspensions10.1108/RPJ-02-2023-0066 ↗
23. Tubular auxetic structures: a review10.1016/j.tws.2023.110850 ↗
24. Energy absorption enhancement of additively manufactured hexagonal and re-entrant (auxetic) lattice structures by using multi-material reinforcements10.1016/j.addma.2022.103076 ↗
25. Lightweight auxetic tubular metamaterials: design and mechanical characteristics10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116849 ↗
26. Effect of printing parameters on the thermal and mechanical properties of 3D-Printed PLA and PETG using fused deposition modeling10.3390/polym13111758 ↗
27. Negative Poisson’s ratio effect of re-entrant anti-trichiral honeycombs under large deformation10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.032 ↗
28. Crashworthiness of energy absorbing structures under combined Shear-Compression loading: effects of materials and geometries10.1007/s42405-024-00779-5 ↗
29. Three-dimensional modeling of auxetic sandwich panels for localized impact resistances10.1177/1099636215618539 ↗
30. Advances in additive manufacturing of auxetic structures for biomedical applications10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110045 ↗
31. Influence of the printing nozzle diameter on tensile strength of produced 3D models in FDM technology10.1515/agriceng-2020-0024 ↗
32. Strength of PLA components fabricated with fused deposition technology using a desktop 3D printer as a function of geometrical parameters of the process10.3390/polym10030313 ↗
33. Effect of auxetic structures on crash behavior of cylindrical tube10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.068 ↗
34. Auxetic meta-materials and their engineering applications: a review10.1088/2631-8695/ad0eb1 ↗
35. A novel Re-Entrant-Type metamaterial with tunable negative Poisson’s ratios and coefficients of thermal expansion10.1142/S1758825122500405 ↗
36. Axial crashworthiness and Multi-Objective optimization of a Bio-Inspired corrugated sandwich tube10.3390/buildings15244397 ↗
37. Design, manufacturing and applications of auxetic tubular structures: a review10.1016/j.tws.2021.107682 ↗
38. Effect of infill pattern, density and material type of 3D printed cubic structure under quasi-static loading10.1177/0954406220971667 ↗
39. Auxetic materials and structures for potential defense applications: an overview and recent developments10.1177/00405175231193433 ↗
40. Structural optimization of the novel 3D graded axisymmetric chiral auxetic structure10.1002/pssb.202200409 ↗
41. Experimental investigation of the crash energy absorption of 2.5D-braided thermoplastic composite tubes10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.037 ↗
42. Compressive behavior and deformation mechanisms of rigid polymeric foams: a review10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110513 ↗
43. Mechanical properties of foam-filled auxetic circular tubes: experimental and numerical study10.1016/j.tws.2021.108584 ↗
44. Salem · 2026 · 35
45. Effect of process parameter on tensile properties of FDM printed PLA
46. An investigation into the layer thickness effect on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured polymers: PLA and ABS10.1007/s00170-023-11270-y ↗
47. Compressive behavior of auxetic structural metamaterial for lightweight construction using ANSYS static structural analysis
48. Quasi-static crashworthiness behaviour of auxetic tubular structures based on rotating deformation mechanism10.1088/1361-665X/ad38a6 ↗
49. In-plane crashworthiness of re-entrant hierarchical honeycombs with negative Poisson’s ratio10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111415 ↗
50. A novel re-entrant honeycomb metamaterial with tunable bandgap10.1088/1361-665X/ac812b ↗
51. Crashworthiness characteristics of 3D printed Thin-Walled square tubes with rectangular holes under Quasi-Static compression loading10.62520/fujece.1709924 ↗
52. Compressive behavior of additively manufactured lightweight structures: infill density optimization based on energy absorption diagrams10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.143 ↗
53. Review on crashworthiness studies of foam filled thin-walled structures
54. Additively manufactured materials and structures: a state-of-the-art review on their mechanical characteristics and energy absorption10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108102 ↗
55. Mechanical properties of 3D re-entrant honeycomb auxetic structures realized via additive manufacturing10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.005 ↗
56. The compressive responses and failure behaviors of composite graded auxetic re-entrant honeycomb structure10.1016/j.tws.2023.110721 ↗
57. Analysis on the collapse stress of auxetic tubular anti-tetrachiral structures10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.105167 ↗
58. A novel type of tubular structure with auxeticity both in radial direction and wall thickness10.1016/j.tws.2021.107758 ↗
59. An experimental study of square tube crushing under impact loading using a modified large scale SHPB10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.013 ↗
60. Innovative auxetic tubular reinforced metamaterial: design and mechanical performance10.1016/j.tws.2024.112703 ↗