journal article·2020-01-08

Camera signal dependencies within coaxial melt pool monitoring in laser powder bed fusion

Tobias Kolb, Reza Elahi, Jan Seeger, Mathews Soris, Christian Scheitler, Oliver Hentschel, Jan Tremel, Michael Schmidt

Rapid Prototyping Journal· Volume 26· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the signal dependency of the camera-based coaxial monitoring system QMMeltpool 3D (Concept Laser GmbH, Lichtenfels, Germany) for laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) under the variation of process parameters, position, direction and layer thickness to determine the capability of the system. Because such and similar monitoring systems are designed and presented for quality assurance in series production, it is important to present the dominant signal influences and limitations. Design/methodology/approach Hardware of the commercially available coaxial monitoring QMMeltpool 3D is used to investigate the thermal emission of the interaction zone during LPBF. The raw images of the camera are analysed by means of image processing to bypass the software of QMMeltpool 3D and to gain a high level of signal understanding. Laser power, scan speed, laser spot diameter and powder layer thickness were varied for single-melt tracks to determine the influence of a parameter variation on the measured sensory signals. The effects of the scan direction and position were also analysed in detail. The influence of surface roughness on the detected sensory signals was simulated by a machined substrate plate. Findings Parameter variations are confirmed to be detectable. Because of strong directional and positional dependencies of the melt-pool monitoring signal a calibration algorithm is necessary. A decreasing signal is detected for increasing layer thickness. Surface roughness is identified as a dominating factor with major influence on the melt-pool monitoring signal exceeding other process flaws. Research limitations/implications This work was performed with the hardware of a commercially available QMMeltpool 3D system of an LPBF machine M2 of the company Concept Laser GmbH. The results are relevant for all melt-pool monitoring research activities connected to LPBF, as well as for end users and serial production. Originality/value Surface roughness has not yet been revealed as being one of the most important origins for signal deviations in coaxial melt-pool monitoring. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the direct comparison of influences because of parameters and environment has not been published to this extent. The detection, evaluation and remelting of surface roughness constitute a plausible workflow for closed-loop control in LPBF.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg , Erlangen, and , Erlangen,

Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT) , Erlangen, and , Erlangen,

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) , Erlangen,

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) , Erlangen, and , Erlangen,

PS/MFT-3DP, Robert Bosch GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany

Chair of Photonic Technologies Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Erlangen, and , Erlangen,

Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT) Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Erlangen, and , Erlangen,

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Quality control of laser-and powder bed-based additive manufacturing (AM) technologies10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.089 ↗
2. Correlation of selective laser melting-melt pool events with the tensile properties of Ti-6Al-4V ELI processed by laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.004 ↗
3. Online quality control of selective laser melting
4. Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 ↗
5. Toward determining melt pool quality metrics via coaxial monitoring in laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.02.009 ↗
6. Process defects and in situ monitoring methods in metal powder bed fusion: a review10.1088/1361-6501/aa5c4f ↗
7. Meso-scale defect evaluation of selective laser melting using spatially resolved acoustic spectroscopy10.1098/rspa.2017.0194 ↗
8. Evaluation of different monitoring methods of laser additive manufacturing of stainless steel
9. In situ morphology-based defect detection of selective laser melting through inline coherent imaging10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.12.024 ↗
10. Qualification of channels produced by laser powder bed fusion: analysis of cleaning methods, flow rate and melt pool monitoring data
11. Melt pool monitoring for laser beam melting of metals: inline-evaluation and remelting of surfaces10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.052 ↗
12. Benchmarking of different SLS/SLM processes as rapid manufacturing techniques
13. The current landscape for additive manufacturing research
14. Design of an optical system for the in situ process monitoring of selective laser melting (SLM)10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.085 ↗
15. Denudation of metal powder layers in laser powder bed fusion processes10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.017 ↗
16. Navrotsky · 2015 · 48
17. Laser based additive manufacturing in industry and academia10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.011 ↗
18. Anomaly detection and classification in a laser powder bed additive manufacturing process using a trained computer vision algorithm10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.009 ↗
19. In-process sensing in selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing10.1186/s40192-016-0045-4 ↗
20. Spatter and oxide formation in laser powder bed fusion of inconel 71810.1016/j.addma.2018.09.032 ↗
21. Wohlers, T., Campbell, I. and Diegel, O. (2018), Wohlers Report 2018, Wohlers Associates, Fort Collins.
22. Real-time monitoring of laser powder bed fusion process using high-speed X-ray imaging and diffraction10.1038/s41598-017-03761-2 ↗
23. Spatter formation in selective laser melting process using multi-laser technology10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.040 ↗
24. Application of supervised machine learning for defect detection during metallic powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using high resolution imaging10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.005 ↗
25. Feedback control of selective laser melting