journal article·2006-09

The biocompatibility and osteoconductivity of a cement containing β–TCP for use in vertebroplasty

K. Goto, S. Shinzato, S. Fujibayashi, J. Tamura, K. Kawanabe, S. Hasegawa, R. Kowalski, T. Nakamura

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A new composite bone cement designated “G2B1” was developed for percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty. G2B1 contains beta tricalcium phosphate particles and methylmethacrylate–methylacrylate copolymer as the powder components, and methylmethacrylate, urethane dimethacrylate, and tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate as the liquid components. Biocompatibility and osteoconductivity were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy, contact microradiography, and Giemsa surface staining 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks after implantation into rat tibiae. To evaluate osteoconductivity, affinity indices (%) were calculated. Scanning electron microscopy and contact microradiography revealed that bone contact with G2B1 was attained within 4 weeks (affinity index: 50.2 ± 11.8 at 4 weeks) and at most of the margin within 26 weeks (affinity index: 87.4 ± 7.2 at 26 weeks). Specifically, G2B1 contacted bone via a wide calcium–phosphate‐rich layer, and its degradation started within 8 weeks, mainly in the marginal area. Giemsa surface staining showed that there was almost no inflammatory reaction around the G2B1. These results indicate that G2B1 is a biocompatible and osteoconductive bone cement. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2006
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty]
2. 10.2106/00004623-198163010-0000510.2106/00004623-198163010-00005 ↗
3. 10.1179/01616410477302651610.1179/016164104773026516 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00586000018210.1007/s005860000182 ↗
5. 10.1302/0301-620X.42B1.2810.1302/0301-620X.42B1.28 ↗
6. 10.3109/1745367940899542310.3109/17453679408995423 ↗
7. 10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00127-110.1016/S8756-3282(99)00127-1 ↗
8. Thermal aspects of the use of polymethylmethacrylate in large metaphyseal defects in bone. A clinical review and laboratory study10.1097/00003086-199310000-00035 ↗
9. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000096668.54378.2510.1097/01.BRS.0000096668.54378.25 ↗
10. Bone substitutes in vertebroplasty
11. 10.1016/0142-9612(85)90008-010.1016/0142-9612(85)90008-0 ↗
12. 10.1002/jbm.82027080510.1002/jbm.820270805 ↗
13. 10.1002/jbm.82025101010.1002/jbm.820251010 ↗
14. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)89660-810.1016/0142-9612(96)89660-8 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.06510.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.065 ↗
16. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(20000305)49:3<319::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-R10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(20000305)49:3<319::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
17. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19991205)47:3<336::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19991205)47:3<336::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
18. 10.1002/jbm.82029050210.1002/jbm.820290502 ↗
19. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200008)51:2<258::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200008)51:2<258::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
20. 10.1016/S0883-5403(89)80022-110.1016/S0883-5403(89)80022-1 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:102639453019210.1023/A:1026394530192 ↗
22. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199811)42:2<223::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-R10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199811)42:2<223::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
23. 10.1002/jbm.a.2008910.1002/jbm.a.20089 ↗
24. 10.1002/1097-4636(20010315)54:4<491::AID-JBM40>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/1097-4636(20010315)54:4<491::AID-JBM40>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
25. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981215)42:4<604::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-G10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981215)42:4<604::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
26. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990615)45:4<277::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-010.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990615)45:4<277::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗