Effects of pore size, implantation time, and nano‐surface properties on rat skin ingrowth into percutaneous porous titanium implants
Source abstract
Abstract
The main problem of percutaneous osseointegrated implants is poor skin‐implant integration, which may cause infection. This study investigated the effects of pore size (Small, 40–100 μm and Large, 100–160 μm), nanotubular surface treatment (Nano), and duration of implantation (3 and 6 weeks) on skin ingrowth into porous titanium. Each implant type was percutaneously inserted in the back of 35 rats randomly assigned to seven groups. Implant extrusion rate was measured weekly and skin ingrowth into implants was determined histologically after harvesting implants. It was found that all three types of implants demonstrated skin tissue ingrowth of over 30% (at week 3) and 50% (at weeks 4–6) of total implant porous area under the skin; longer implantation resulted in greater skin ingrowth (p< 0.05). Only one case of infection was observed (infection rate 2.9%). Small and Nano groups showed the same implant extrusion rate which was lower than the Large group rate (0.06 ± 0.01 vs. 0.16 ± 0.02 cm/week;p< 0.05). Ingrowth area was comparable in the Small, Large, and Nano implants. However, qualitatively, the Nano implants showed greatest cellular inhabitation within first 3 weeks. We concluded that percutaneous porous titanium implants allow for skin integration with the potential for a safe seal. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 102A: 1305–1315, 2014.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Applied Physiology, Center for Human Movement Studies Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Georgia
St. Joseph's Translational Research Institute Atlanta Georgia
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tufts University Boston Massachusetts
Poly‐Ortho International Sharon Massachusetts
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Permanent percutaneous devices
2. 10.1007/s10439-010-9937-110.1007/s10439-010-9937-1 ↗
3. 10.3201/eid0702.01022610.3201/eid0702.010226 ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.82018040310.1002/jbm.820180403 ↗
5. 10.1016/0142-9612(85)90091-210.1016/0142-9612(85)90091-2 ↗
6. 10.1002/jbm.82022020510.1002/jbm.820220205 ↗
7. 10.1016/0142-9612(88)90003-810.1016/0142-9612(88)90003-8 ↗
8. 10.1002/jbm.82024030310.1002/jbm.820240303 ↗
9. Epidermal and dermal integration into sphere‐templated porous poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) implants in mice10.1002/jbm.a.32798 ↗
10. 10.1002/jbm.a.3038410.1002/jbm.a.30384 ↗
11. 10.1002/jbm.a.3312510.1002/jbm.a.33125 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04609.x10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04609.x ↗
13. Evaluating antimicrobials and implant materials for infection prevention around transcutaneous osseointegrated implants in a rabbit model10.1002/jbm.a.32413 ↗
14. Assessing peri‐Implant tissue infection prevention in a percutaneous model
15. 10.1682/JRRD.2005.05.016010.1682/JRRD.2005.05.0160 ↗
16. 10.1682/JRRD.2006.12.016010.1682/JRRD.2006.12.0160 ↗
17. 10.1682/JRRD.2008.09.012310.1682/JRRD.2008.09.0123 ↗
18. 10.1002/jbm.b.3266310.1002/jbm.b.32663 ↗
19. 10.1002/jbm.82006050910.1002/jbm.820060509 ↗
20. 10.1002/jbm.82028090910.1002/jbm.820280909 ↗
21. 10.1016/0142-9612(83)90072-810.1016/0142-9612(83)90072-8 ↗
22. 10.1016/0141-5425(83)90080-810.1016/0141-5425(83)90080-8 ↗
23. 10.1682/JRRD.2008.06.008010.1682/JRRD.2008.06.0080 ↗
24. 10.1002/jor.2208110.1002/jor.22081 ↗
25. 10.1177/0003489405114S120110.1177/0003489405114S1201 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-210.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2 ↗
27. 10.1080/00016480045412510.1080/000164800454125 ↗
28. 10.3109/0284431820900656510.3109/02844318209006565 ↗
29. Design features of the implants for direct skeletal attachment of limb prostheses
30. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.11.00710.1016/j.medengphy.2010.11.007 ↗
31. 10.1002/jbm.82008031110.1002/jbm.820080311 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.01610.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.016 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00100-410.1016/S0142-9612(01)00100-4 ↗
34. Fabrication, geometry, and mechanical properties of highly ordered TiO2 nanotubular arrays
35. FarrellBJ PitkinM PopatK PrilutskyBI.Effect of Pore size Implantation Time and Nano‐Surface Properties on Rat Skin Ingrowth into Porous Titanium. In: 4th International Conference: Advances in Orthopaedic Osseointegration. San Francisco CA. February 10 2012.
36. PitkinM RaykhtsaumG; Skin integrated device. US Patent 8257435. 2012.
37. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/4/04510210.1088/0957-4484/20/4/045102 ↗
38. 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.rdc.2009.03.00210.1016/j.rdc.2009.03.002 ↗
40. 10.1002/jbm.82016050510.1002/jbm.820160505 ↗
41. 10.1021/js960350c10.1021/js960350c ↗