Rapid‐prototyped and salt‐leached PLGA scaffolds condition cell morpho‐functional behavior
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Three dimensional scaffolds microfabricated using pressure‐assisted microsyringe (PAM) with controlled geometry and porous membranes obtained using salt leaching were both tested with three different cell types to identify an optimal microstructural architecture for tissue engineering. MG63 (osteoblast‐like cells) were used as models of mesenchymal bone tissue and human endothelial cells and NCTC2544 (keratinocytes) represented two epithelial tissues. Both porosity and stiffness of PLGA structures were measured, and cell morphology and cytoskeletal organization analyzed using SEM and actin labeling. The results show that overall the PAM scaffolds, which have a repeated and regular microstructure, are more biocompatible than the random pore salt‐leached membranes, and that surface morphology as well as substrate stiffness modulates cell behavior. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 2008
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/jbm.1019510.1002/jbm.10195 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat142110.1038/nmat1421 ↗
3. 10.1557/S088376940003181X10.1557/S088376940003181X ↗
4. 10.1042/BA2003010810.1042/BA20030108 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00099-410.1016/S0142-9612(98)00099-4 ↗
6. 10.1161/01.RES.0000039537.73816.E510.1161/01.RES.0000039537.73816.E5 ↗
7. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85754-110.1016/0142-9612(96)85754-1 ↗
8. 10.1163/156856295X0080510.1163/156856295X00805 ↗
9. 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90953-910.1016/0032-3861(94)90953-9 ↗
10. 10.1089/10763270130000326910.1089/107632701300003269 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00021-010.1016/S0142-9612(98)00021-0 ↗
12. 10.1089/ten.1999.5.42110.1089/ten.1999.5.421 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00052-810.1016/S0142-9612(03)00052-8 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2006.00200.x10.1111/j.1525-1594.2006.00200.x ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00491.x10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00491.x ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00287.x10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00287.x ↗
17. 10.1016/S0098-2997(02)00008-010.1016/S0098-2997(02)00008-0 ↗
18. 10.1359/JBMR.04122610.1359/JBMR.041226 ↗
19. 10.1089/10763270232093418210.1089/107632702320934182 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-210.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-2 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0753-3322(02)00329-310.1016/S0753-3322(02)00329-3 ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-410.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4 ↗
23. Making tissue engineering scaffolds work: The application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds10.22203/eCM.v005a03 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00415-410.1016/S0142-9612(00)00415-4 ↗
26. 10.1002/jor.110016020410.1002/jor.1100160204 ↗
27. Optimisation of PAM scaffolds for neural tissue engineering
28. 10.1038/nrm168210.1038/nrm1682 ↗
29. 10.1242/jcs.0168910.1242/jcs.01689 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ejps.2003.10.00110.1016/j.ejps.2003.10.001 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00153-210.1016/S0142-9612(99)00153-2 ↗
32. 10.1002/bit.2070310.1002/bit.20703 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.03910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗