Scaling up the 3D printing of surgical guides: repeatability and energy efficiency
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose This paper aims to investigate the repeatability of the Stereolithography (SLA) process and to provide reliable guidelines to minimize energy consumption without sacrificing part quality. To tackle these aims, an extensive experimental campaign has been conceived: two different machines (of the same model) have been operated in different production environment, specimens and parts with different orientations have been manufactured. Design/methodology/approach A two-step experimental campaign has been carried out. In the first stage, surgical guides were printed with different positions and orientations with respect to the printing plate to investigate the link between energy consumption and printing configuration. In the second stage, the repeatability of the process has been studied, dog bone specimens, accuracy cubes and surgical guides have been printed with two printers operating in two different production environments. Energy consumption, mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy have been measured as reference output to assess the repeatability and the energy consumption of the process. Findings Repeatability was found to be quite stable and reliable by using the same machine in the same production environment. In particular, by varying machine and production environments, variability was found to be low in dimensional accuracy and high for mechanical properties since they are affected by resin temperature, room temperature and the electrical system of the building. Thus, in this study, it was found that the production environment plays a non-negligible role in the output of the manufacturing processes, and it is necessary to be considered especially for scaling up 3D printing. Originality/value Additive manufacturing (AM) parts production for biomedicine represents a prosumer-oriented phenomenon. This market relies on the repeatability of the printing process which is where the AM processes usually fall short. Moreover, this increasing demand needs to be properly managed to pursue sustainable development, thus responsible energy consumption is mandatory. Nevertheless, energy consumption to manufacture 3D printed parts on a large scale represents a non-negligible aspect that still has not been well considered in the literature. The joint investigation of energy consumption, mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy to evaluate the repeatability and energy efficiency of SLA parts represents the novelty of this study.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anatomy and Medical Technology · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Naples Federico II Department of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, , Naples,
The Ohio State University Center for Design and Manufacturing Excellence, , Columbus, ,
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Carbon footprint and embodied energy of a wind turbine blade — a case study10.1007/s11367-021-01907-z ↗
2. Medical 3D printing cost-Savings in orthopedic and maxillofacial surgery: cost analysis of operating room time saved with 3D printed anatomic models and surgical guides10.1016/j.acra.2019.08.011 ↗
3. 3D printing technology; methods, biomedical applications, future opportunities and trends10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.050 ↗
4. A preliminary investigation of energy consumption for turning Ti6Al4V EBM cylindrical parts10.4028/p-vm4f1y ↗
5. Energy consumption assessment in manufacturing Ti6Al4V electron beam melted parts post – processed by machining10.1007/s00170-022-10794-z ↗
6. Applications of 3D printing in healthcare10.5114/kitp.2016.62625 ↗
7. Formlabs (2019), “4 Ways LFS 3D printing produces better parts”, available at:https://formlabs.com/blog/benefits-of-lfs-3d-printing/.
8. Formlabs (2023), “Medical resins”, available at:https://support.formlabs.com/s/topic/0TO1Y000000gVImWAM/medical-resins-form-3b?language=en_US.
9. Computer-Assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in microvascular mandible reconstruction10.1002/lary.23717 ↗
10. A review of stereolithography: processes and systems10.3390/pr8091138 ↗
11. Transforming usual consumers into prosumers with the help of intellectual capital collaboration for innovation10.7763/IJIET.2013.V3.304 ↗
12. Additive manufacturing technologies with emphasis on stereolithography 3D printing in pharmaceutical and medical applications: a review10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100159 ↗
13. The potential of 3D printing to reduce the environmental impacts of production
14. Fused deposition modeling of microfluidic chips in transparent polystyrene10.3390/mi12111348 ↗
15. Sustainable advances in SLA/DLP 3D printing materials and processes10.1039/d1gc01489g ↗
16. Evaluating Eco-Efficiency of 3D printing in the aeronautic industry10.1111/jiec.12693 ↗
17. Attitudes and behaviours of Italian 3D prosumer in the era of additive manufacturing10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.095 ↗
18. An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and technology: applications technological, materials, an overview on 3D printing and applications10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089 ↗
19. Effects of steam sterilization on 3D printed biocompatible resin materials for surgical guides — an accuracy assessment study
20. Hot lithography vs room temperature DLP 3D-Printing of a dimethacrylate10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.013 ↗
21. Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing of an antihypertensive polyprintlet: case study of an unexpected photopolymer-drug reaction10.1016/j.addma.2020.101071 ↗