Design, fabrication, and multi-objective optimization of 3D-printed PLA screws
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose In recent years, 3D printing technologies have grown significantly due to their versatility in producing components with complex geometries. In line with this trend, polylactic acid (PLA) has emerged as a highly applicable material due to its biocompatibility and biodegradability, along with adequate mechanical strength, making it suitable for the development of fastening and load-bearing components. However, the fabrication of such mechanical parts requires the consideration of multiple factors that ultimately influence both surface quality and mechanical properties of the final products. Design/methodology/approach In this study, a Design of Experiments (DOE) approach is implemented to vary the most critical parameters of the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) process, namely, nozzle diameter (ND), layer height (LH), extrusion temperature (TE), printing speed (PS) and extrusion multiplier (EM). Standardized specimens were used to measure the response variables. Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) models were developed to predict surface roughness, density and tensile strength, consistently outperforming regression models across all error metrics. A multi-objective optimization (MOO) based on particle swarm optimization was then applied to determine optimal processing conditions for PLA screw prototypes, which were subsequently manufactured (single- and double-thread) and validated through tensile and pull-out tests. Findings From the results, when all response variables had the same weight in the trade-off, the optimization indicated that the optimal parameter values within the selected range were ND = 0.25 mm, TE = 210 ºC, EM = 90%, LH = 0.1 mm and PS = 30 mm/s, achieving in the experimental validation a surface roughness (Ra) of 6.38 µm, a density of 1.2277 g/cm³ and an ultimate tensile strength of 63.20 MPa. Originality/value By combining ANFIS modeling with particle swarm-based MOO, this study provides a systematic strategy to identify optimal FFF processing parameters for PLA components. The integrated approach of modeling, optimization and experimental validation and experimental validation on PLA screw prototypes establishes a robust pathway for designing high-performance screws outperforming regression models. These findings underline the critical role of parameter tuning, where the optimization allows for trade-offs between mechanical performance and surface quality, which is very important in balancing strength, density and surface roughness, particularly in applications where multi-criteria optimization is essential.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Polymer Foaming and Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Public University of Navarre Department of Engineering, , Pamplona, , and Institute for Advanced Materials and Mathematics (INAMAT2), Public University of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
Public University of Navarre Department of Engineering, , Pamplona,
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Comparative study of I-optimal design and definitive screening design for developing prediction models and optimization of average surface roughness of PLA printed parts using fused deposition modeling10.1007/s00170-022-10784-1 ↗
2. Dimensional accuracy of FDM-printed polymer parts10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0115 ↗
3. A review on exploration of the mechanical characteristics of 3D-printed biocomposites fabricated by fused deposition modelling (FDM)10.1108/RPJ-04-2023-0150 ↗
4. A review on materials application in scaffold design by fused deposition method10.1007/s40032-023-00988-z ↗
5. Influence of 3D printing conditions on physical–mechanical properties of polymer materials10.3390/polym17010043 ↗
6. Analysis of am parameters on surface roughness obtained in PLA parts printed with FFF technology10.3390/polym13142384 ↗
7. Fused deposition modelling: current status, methodology, applications and future prospects10.1016/j.addma.2021.102378 ↗
8. A novel model to estimate the structural properties of PLA-FFF components along any non-orthogonal direction10.1108/RPJ-01-2024-0051 ↗
9. Failure mode, effects and criticality analysis improvement by using new criticality assessment and prioritization based approach10.1108/JEDT-07-2021-0395 ↗
10. Neural network modeling and particle swarm optimization (PSO) of process parameters in pulsed laser micromachining of hardened AISI H13 steel10.1080/10426910802679568 ↗
11. D’Mello · 2017 · 10510.1016/j.asoc.2016.12.003 ↗
12. Investigation of mechanical properties in FFF- produced PLA samples using the Erichsen test: application of definitive screening and RSM10.1108/RPJ-08-2024-0342 ↗
13. Optimizing impact resistance of FFF-printed PLA parts: a comprehensive analysis of infill patterns and process parameters10.1108/RPJ-03-2025-0098 ↗
14. Predictive modeling and statistical optimization of geometrical accuracy in thin-walled HT-PLA parts fabricated by FFF10.1108/RPJ-05-2025-0180 ↗
15. Neural-Based ensembles for particulate matter forecasting10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3050437 ↗
16. A methodology to increase the accuracy of particulate matter predictors based on time decomposition10.3390/su12187310 ↗
17. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002 ↗
18. Powder bed defect classification methods: deep learning vs traditional machine learning10.1108/RPJ-07-2023-0243 ↗
19. Ershad-Langroudi · 202410.1016/j.jiec.2024.03.030 ↗
20. Minimizing error on circularity of FDM manufactured part10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.324 ↗
21. Additive manufacturing of functional devices for environmental applications: a review10.1016/j.jece.2022.108049 ↗
22. Effect of process parameters on parts quality and process efficiency of fused deposition modeling10.1016/j.cie.2021.107238 ↗
23. An effective cellular particle swarm optimization for parameters optimization of a multi-pass milling process10.1016/j.asoc.2012.06.007 ↗
24. Surface roughness of As-Printed polymers: a comprehensive review10.1007/s00170-023-11566-z ↗
25. Simultaneous impact of build orientation on mechanical properties, geometrical measurements and surface roughness in material extrusion manufacturing10.1108/RPJ-07-2024-0320 ↗
26. Development of a genetic algorithm – artificial neural network model to optimize the dimensional accuracy of parts printed by FFF10.1108/RPJ-09-2023-0314 ↗
27. Hikmat · 2021 · 10026410.1016/j.rineng.2021.100264 ↗
28. The effects of surface roughness on the functionality of Ti13Nb13Zr orthopedic implants10.26717/bjstr.2021.38.006104 ↗
29. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system10.1109/21.256541 ↗
30. Jasmine · 2022 · 45710.1002/9781119905301.ch16 ↗
31. Kennedy · 1995 · 194210.1109/ICNN.1995.488968 ↗
32. Optimizing FFF process parameters to enhance PLA performance on Low-Cost 3D printers10.69996/jepe.2025003 ↗
33. Lobato · 2014 · 26110.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.004 ↗
34. Design methodology for fused filament fabrication for medical and personalization applications: framework, database, methodology and study of case10.1108/RPJ-02-2025-0048 ↗
35. Multi-objective optimization of electrical discharge machining parameters using particle swarm optimization10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111300 ↗
36. Multi-objective optimization of electrical discharge machining parameters using particle swarm optimization [source code]10.24433/CO.2209714.v1 ↗
37. Multi-objective optimization of surface roughness, dimensional errors and density in FFF 3D-printed glass fiber-reinforced PP parts via adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference modeling10.1108/RPJ-11-2024-0485 ↗
38. Prediction of shear strength of concrete produced by using pozzolanic materials and partly replacing NFA by MS using ANN10.1108/JEDT-12-2019-0346 ↗
39. Optimizing fused deposition modelling parameters based on the design for additive manufacturing to enhance product sustainability10.1016/j.compind.2022.103833 ↗
40. Mukherjee · 2012 · 250610.1016/j.asoc.2012.03.053 ↗
41. Nguyen · 199810.1007/978-1-4615-5505-6 ↗
42. Predicting geometric errors and failures in additive manufacturing10.1108/RPJ-11-2022-0402 ↗
43. An artificial neural network-based predictive model for tensile behavior estimation under uncertainty for fused deposition modeling10.1108/RPJ-04-2024-0168 ↗
44. Multi objective optimization of FDM 3D printing parameters set via design of experiments and machine learning algorithms10.1038/s41598-025-01016-z ↗
45. Analysis of the influence of printing parameters on the compression resistance of PLA in the FDM process10.1108/RPJ-04-2024-0165 ↗
46. Design, fabrication, and characterization of 3D-printed ABS and PLA scaffolds potentially for tissue engineering p10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101685 ↗
47. Biocompatibility and safety of PLA and its copolymers10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.012 ↗
48. Review of swarm intelligence-based feature selection methods10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104210 ↗
49. Optimization of surface roughness in FDM 3D printer using response surface methodology, particle swarm optimization, and symbiotic organism search algorithms International10.1007/s00170-019-04568-3 ↗
50. Sahoo · 2023 · 84310.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.208 ↗
51. Additive manufacturing for prostheses development: state of the art10.1108/RPJ-01-2022-0029 ↗
52. A hybrid ANN/PSO optimization of material composition and process parameters for enhancement of mechanical characteristics of 3D-printed sample10.1108/RPJ-10-2022-0338 ↗
53. Recent advances in neuro-fuzzy system: a survey10.1016/j.knosys.2018.04.014 ↗
54. Particle swarm optimisation in designing parameters of manufacturing processes: a review (2008–2018)10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105743 ↗
55. Optimizing the printing parameters for dimensional accuracy of distal femur bone by using Taguchi’s method10.1186/s44147-023-00338-x ↗
56. An experimental study on the impact of layer height and annealing parameters on the tensile strength and dimensional accuracy of FDM 3D printed parts10.3390/ma16134574 ↗
57. Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313399 ↗
58. 3D printing custom bioactive and absorbable surgical screws, pins, and bone plates for localized drug delivery10.3390/jfb10020017 ↗
59. A response surface methodology investigation into the optimization of manufacturing time and quality for FFF 3D printed PLA parts10.1108/RPJ-01-2024-0004 ↗
60. Determination of optimum production parameters for 3D printers based on nozzle diameter10.1108/RPJ-08-2020-0185 ↗
61. Fuzzy logic ToolboxTM
62. Additive manufacturing in the biomedical field-recent research developments10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100661 ↗
63. A comprehensive study on the effects of printing parameters on the mechanical properties of PLA10.1108/RPJ-03-2024-0137 ↗
64. UNE-EN ISO 527-2. Plastics. Determination of tensile properties. Part 2: test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics (ISO 527-2:2012)
65. Fused deposition modelling interfacial and interlayer bonding in PLA post-processed parts10.1108/RPJ-06-2019-0176 ↗
66. A hybrid genetic algorithm-neural network model for optimizing thermal and mechanical characteristics of 3D-printed parts10.1108/RPJ-02-2025-0085 ↗
67. Parameter optimization of a multi-pass milling process using non-traditional optimization algorithms10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.007 ↗
68. Research progress in polylactic acid processing for 3D printing10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.01.038 ↗
69. Wang · 2023 · 1292910.1007/s10853-023-08831-7 ↗
70. Application and evaluation of fused deposition modeling technique in customized medical products10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122999 ↗
71. Optimization of FDM 3D printing process parameters for multi-material using artificial neural network10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.225 ↗
72. Strength and surface characteristics of FDM-Based 3D printed PLA parts for multiple infill design patterns10.1007/s40032-020-00625-z ↗