Multivariate analysis of the mechanical properties of carbon fiber PLA composites using Box-Behnken design
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose With the growing global demand for sustainable and high-performance materials in additive manufacturing, particularly for lightweight structural components, optimizing composite formulations is essential. This study aims to investigate how key 3D printing parameters affect the mechanical performance of carbon fiber-reinforced polylactic acid (CFPLA) composites. Design/methodology/approach A Box-Behnken design was applied to evaluate the effects of carbon fiber content, infill percentage and number of wall perimeters on the density, Young’s modulus and specific stiffness of printed specimens. Statistical modeling and multivariate optimization were used to analyze individual and combined factor effects. Findings Carbon fiber content had the greatest influence on Young’s modulus and specific stiffness, while infill and wall count mainly affected density. Specific stiffness was highly responsive to fiber reinforcement and minimally affected by infill. Regression models showed strong predictive power (R2 > 95%). The optimal tested configuration (10% CF, 10% infill, 4 walls) delivered excellent stiffness with a small density increase. CFPLA outperformed pure PLA in stiffness, though at the cost of reduced ductility. This study also suggests that ≈7.5% CF filaments could offer a good balance between performance and manufacturability. Originality/value This work contributes to the global effort to improve structural efficiency in 3D-printed parts by providing a robust experimental framework for optimizing CFPLA composites. The findings offer practical guidance for engineering applications requiring strong, lightweight and sustainable materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Sul (IFRS) Department of Electromechanics, , Ibirubá,
UFRGS Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Porto Alegre,
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Engineering, , Porto Alegre,
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS10.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
2. Experimental investigation of influence of process parameters on mechanical properties of carbon fibre PLA 3D printed samples10.1007/s40964-024-00751-5 ↗
3. Izod impact and hardness properties of 3D printed lightweight CF-reinforced PLA composites using design of experiment10.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.04.006 ↗
4. ASTM · 2022
5. The rise of 3-D printing: the advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011 ↗
6. 3-D printing: the new industrial revolution10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003 ↗
7. Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 ↗
8. Multi-objective optimization of FDM process parameters for 3D-printed polycarbonate using Taguchi-based gray relational analysis10.1007/s00170-025-15392-3 ↗
9. Impact of inkjet printing parameters and environmental conditions on formation of 2D and 3D binder jetting geometries10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.09.024 ↗
10. Importance of polymer rheology on material extrusion additive manufacturing: correlating process physics to print properties10.1021/acsapm.0c01228 ↗
11. Printing parameters and materials affecting mechanical properties of FDM-3D printed parts: perspective and prospects10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.003 ↗
12. Modelling of an additive 3D-printing process based on design of experiments methodology10.12776/qip.v24i1.1435 ↗
13. 3D printing: new economic paradigms and strategic shifts10.1111/1758-5899.12119 ↗
14. Additive manufacturing technologies: an overview about 3D printing methods and future prospects10.1155/2019/9656938 ↗
15. Effect of fused deposition machine parameters on tensile strength of printed carbon fiber reinforced PLA thermoplastics10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.033 ↗
16. Additive manufacturing of structural materials10.1016/j.mser.2020.100596 ↗
17. Optimization of FDM 3-D printer process parameters for surface roughness and mechanical properties using PLA material10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.422 ↗
18. Effects of printing parameters on the mechanical strength of thermoplastics 3D printed specimens
19. Technological parameters effects on mechanical properties of biodegradable materials using FDM10.37358/Mat.Plast.1964 ↗
20. Montgomery · 2019
21. Investigation of the mechanical properties, surface quality, and energy efficiency of a fused filament fabrication for PA610.1515/rams-2022-0332 ↗
22. Effect of layer thickness and cross-section geometry on the tensile and compression properties of 3D printed ABS10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100626 ↗
23. Effect of infill ratio on the tensile and flexural properties of unreinforced and carbon fiber-reinforced polylactic acid manufactured by fused deposition modeling10.1007/s11665-021-05694-4 ↗
24. Robot-assisted laser additive manufacturing for high-strength/low-porosity continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2023.110397 ↗
25. Analysis of the influence of printing parameters on the compression resistance of PLA in the FDM process10.1108/RPJ-04-2024-0165 ↗
26. A multiobjective optimization parameters applied to additive manufacturing: DOE-based approach to 3D printing10.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.136 ↗
27. 3D printing disrupts manufacturing: how economies of one create new rules of competition10.5437/08956308X5606193 ↗
28. Recent advances in additive manufacturing of engineering thermoplastics: challenges and opportunities10.1039/D0RA04857G ↗
29. Bio-inspired 3D infill patterns for additive manufacturing and structural applications10.3390/ma12030499 ↗
30. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 ↗
31. Additive manufacturing: expanding 3D printing horizon in industry 4.010.1007/s12008-022-00956-4 ↗
32. Rayna · 2014 · 11910.1007/978-3-319-04313-5_11 ↗
33. Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.051 ↗
34. Box-Behnken design to optimise 3D printing parameters in applications for fashion products10.1504/IJEDPO.2022.131225 ↗
35. The additive manufacturing innovation: a range of implications10.1108/JMTM-06-2016-0081 ↗
36. Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
37. Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038 ↗
38. Different production processes for thermoplastic composite materials: sustainability versus mechanical properties and processes parameter10.3390/polym15010242 ↗
39. Experimental and prediction analysis of high-velocity impact resistance of 3D printed PLA and carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites10.1088/2053-1591/adbdae ↗
40. Study on optimization of 3D printing parameters10.1088/1757-899X/392/6/062050 ↗
41. 3D printing for polymer/particle-based processing: a review10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109102 ↗
42. Optimization of FDM 3D printing process parameters for multi-material using artificial neural network10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.225 ↗
43. Influence of 3D printing process parameters on the mechanical properties and mass of PLA parts and predictive models10.1108/RPJ-03-2020-0043 ↗