journal article·2026-01-06

Optimizing impact resistance of FFF-printed PLA parts: a comprehensive analysis of infill patterns and process parameters

Sermet Demır, Sinan Dönmez, Paşa Yayla

Rapid Prototyping Journal· Volume 32· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to systematically investigate how various infill patterns and process parameters influence the impact behavior of 3D-printed polylactic acid (PLA) parts produced via fused filament fabrication (FFF). Design/methodology/approach The research used instrumented Charpy impact testing based on ISO 179-2 standard to evaluate the impact behavior of PLA specimens. An initial screening experiment evaluated ten commonly used infill patterns to identify candidates. Subsequently, four promising patterns were selected for optimization through a Taguchi designed experiment, considering key process parameters such as layer height, printing speed, nozzle temperature and nozzle diameter. Statistical analysis was used to determine influential parameters on mechanical performance. Findings Among the tested designs, the octet achieved the highest peak force of 521.20 N, outperforming the zigzag and gyroid, which indicates its superior resistance to impact loads. The cubic subdivision pattern exhibited consistent but moderate strength, making it suitable for applications requiring reliability. The zigzag exhibited the highest total energy absorption of 0.750 J, demonstrating its superior capability to dissipate impact energy. ANOVA results revealed that the infill pattern was responsible for 70.68% of the total variation in impact performance, while nozzle diameter contributed 13.94%, highlighting the dominant role of internal structure design in determining mechanical properties. Optimal mechanical performance was observed at a printing speed of 40 mm/s and a layer height of 0.14 mm, which correlated with higher peak force and improved energy absorption. Originality/value The findings offer actionable guidelines for designing lightweight, durable and cost-efficient components, bridging the gap between academic research and industrial application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Affiliations

Doğuş Universitesi Department of Mechanical Engineering, , İstanbul,

Marmara University Department of Mechanical Engineering, , İstanbul,

Funding

Doğuş University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. Additive manufacturing of polymer-based composites using fused filament fabrication (FFF): a review10.1007/s10443-021-09933-8 ↗
2. Additive manufacturing for sustainability and circular economy: needs, challenges, and opportunities for 3D printing of recycled polymeric waste10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100529 ↗
3. Application of ınstrumented charpy method in characterisation of materials10.7906/indecs.13.3.12 ↗
4. Advancements in 3D printing techniques for biomedical applications: a comprehensive review of materials consideration, post processing, applications, and challenges10.1007/s43939-024-00115-4 ↗
5. Investigation of infill-patterns on mechanical response of 3D printed poly-lactic-acid10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106557 ↗
6. Effect of infill density, infill pattern and extrusion temperature on mechanical properties of part produced by 3D printing FDM technology using ABS
7. 3D-printing technologies for electrochemical applications10.1039/C5CS00714C ↗
8. Correlation between process parameters and mechanical properties in parts printed by the fused deposition modeling process10.1007/978-3-319-95083-9_8 ↗
9. Influence of Three-Dimensional printing parameters on compressive properties and surface smoothness of polylactic acid specimens10.3390/polym15183827 ↗
10. The impact of process parameters on the tensile strength, flexural strength and the manufacturing time of fused filament fabricated (FFF) parts10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.691 ↗
11. 4D printing of shape memory polylactic acid (PLA) components: ınvestigating the role of the operational parameters in fused deposition modelling (FDM)10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.11.036 ↗
12. Methods and materials for additive manufacturing: a critical review on advancements and challenges10.1016/j.tws.2020.107228 ↗
13. Mechanical properties of PLA-graphene filament for FDM 3D printing10.1007/s00170-019-03532-5 ↗
14. Effect of raster and layer characteristics on tensile behavior and failure of FFF printed PLA samples by representative volume element model10.1177/09544054231202210 ↗
15. Csenge Tóth · 2024
16. Mechanical characterization of additively manufactured polymer composites: a state-of-the-art review and future scope10.1002/pc.27431 ↗
18. Investigation on impact strength of 3D printed PLA: effect of part orientation, infill pattern and infill percentage10.1504/IJMTM.2023.133681 ↗
19. Evaluation of effect and optimizing of process parameters for fused deposition modeling parts on tensile properties via taguchi method10.1108/RPJ-06-2022-0201 ↗
20. The investigation of printing parameters effect on tensile characteristics for triply periodic minimal surface designs by Taguchi10.1002/pen.26608 ↗
21. Applications of PLA in modern medicine10.1016/j.engreg.2020.08.002 ↗
22. A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their ınfluence on part characteristics10.3390/jmmp3030064 ↗
23. Optimizing process parameters of fused deposition modeling by taguchi method for the fabrication of lattice structures10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.004 ↗
24. Effects of building orientation and raster angle on the mechanical properties of selected materials used in FFF techniques”, materials10.3390/ma17246076 ↗
25. Advances in fused deposition modeling on process, process parameters, and multifaceted industrial application: a review10.1088/2631-8695/ad32f6 ↗
26. Experimental analysis of the effects of different production directions on the mechanical characteristics of ABS, PLA, and PETG materials produced by FDM10.1515/mt-2023-0206 ↗
27. Evaluation of the polyamide’s mechanical properties for varying infill percentage in FDM process10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.227 ↗
29. Process–structure–properties in polymer additive manufacturing via material extrusion: a review10.1080/10408436.2018.1549977 ↗
30. The effect of processing parameters on the mechanical characteristics of PLA produced by a 3D FFF printer10.1007/s00170-020-06138-4 ↗
31. Manufacturing and characterization of 3D miniature polymer lattice structures using fused filament fabrication10.3390/polym13040635 ↗
32. Effect of printing orientation and layer thickness on microstructure and mechanical properties of PLA parts10.37934/mjcsm.8.1.1123 ↗
33. Effect of 3D printing process parameters on damping characteristic of cantilever beams fabricated using material extrusion10.3390/polym15020257 ↗
34. ISO 179 Plastics (2023), “Determination of charpy ımpact properties”, British Standards Institution, London.
35. ISO 179-1:2023 (2025), “ISO”, available at:Link to the cited article (accessed21 January 2025).
36. ISO 179-2:2020 (2025), “ISO”, available at:Link to the cited article (accessed21 January 2025).
37. The effect of ınfill pattern on tensile strength of PLA material in fused deposition modeling (FDM) process10.30684/etj.2021.131733.1054 ↗
38. Sustainability perspectives – a review of additive and subtractive manufacturing10.1016/j.smse.2023.100015 ↗
39. A review on PLA with different fillers used as a filament in 3D printing10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.413 ↗
40. A multi-parametric process evaluation of the mechanical response of PLA in FFF 3D printing10.1080/10426914.2022.2089895 ↗
41. A systematic review of design for additive manufacturing of aerospace lattice structures: current trends and future directions10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.101021 ↗
42. Insights into flexural and impact properties of polymer based materials printed through fused filament fabrication: progress in the last decade10.1016/j.ijlmm.2024.05.011 ↗
43. A review on the fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing: filament processing, materials, and printing parameters10.1515/eng-2021-0063 ↗
44. A critical review of fused deposition modeling 3D printing technology in manufacturing polylactic acid parts10.1007/s00170-019-03332-x ↗
45. A review on the melt extrusion-based fused deposition modeling (FDM): background, materials, process parameters and military applications10.1007/s12008-023-01354-0 ↗
46. Instrumented charpy ımpact tests of additively manufactured specimens
47. An investigation to study the combined effect of different infill pattern and infill density on the impact strength of 3D printed polylactic acid parts10.1016/j.coco.2020.100605 ↗
48. The roles and applications of additive manufacturing in the aerospace and automobile sector10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.596 ↗
49. Fracture testing of polymer materials processed via fused filament fabrication: a survey of materials, methods, and design applications10.1007/s40964-021-00196-0 ↗
50. Bonding additively manufactured PLA materials: effects of joint scarf angle and substrate raster orientation10.56193/matim.1248357 ↗
51. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 ↗
52. The enhancement in process parameters of fused deposition modelling used for 3D printed components from the perspective of enhancement of mechanical strength properties: a narrative review10.1063/5.0202077 ↗
53. A comprehensive review of emerging additive manufacturing (3D printing technology): methods, materials, applications, challenges, trends and future potential10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.059 ↗
54. Effect of infill pattern and infill density on mechanical behaviour of FDM 3D printed parts- a current review10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.310 ↗
55. Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications10.1007/s00170-022-08860-7 ↗
56. Impact strength of 3D printed PLA using open source FFF-based 3D printer10.1007/s40964-020-00150-6 ↗
57. Contribution of geometrical infill pattern on mechanical behaviour of 3D manufactured polylactic acid specimen: experimental and numerical analysis10.1177/14777606241281614 ↗
58. Design for additive manufacturing: past, present, and future directions10.1115/1.4028073 ↗
59. A comprehensive review on fused deposition modelling of polylactic acid10.1007/s40964-022-00356-w ↗
60. Shah · 2020
61. Materials requirements in fused filament fabrication: a framework for the design of next-generation 3D printable thermoplastics and composites10.1002/mame.202200197 ↗
62. Effect of infill density and infill pattern on the mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA parts10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.312 ↗
63. An experimental study on the ımpact of layer height and annealing parameters on the tensile strength and dimensional accuracy of FDM 3D printed parts10.3390/ma16134574 ↗
64. Advancements in 3D printing materials: a comparative analysis of performance and applications10.59429/ace.v7i2.3867 ↗
65. Optimisation of strength properties of FDM printed parts—a critical review10.3390/polym13101587 ↗
66. A review on fused deposition modeling materials with analysis of key process parameters influence on mechanical properties10.1007/s00170-023-12823-x ↗
67. Optimization of charpy ımpact strength of tough PLA samples produced by 3D printing using the taguchi method10.3390/polym16040459 ↗
68. The effects of FFF 3D printing parameters on energy consumption10.1080/10426914.2022.2105882 ↗
69. Fused deposition modelling: a review10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0106 ↗
70. Comparison of the charpy resilience of two 3D printed materials: a study on the ımpact resistance of plastic parts10.48084/etasr.5876 ↗
71. A study on the evaluation of the compression behavior of PLA lattice structures manufactured by FDM10.48084/etasr.6262 ↗
72. Effect of printing temperature on the mechanical properties of 3D printed polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) during simple and repeated impact tests10.1556/1848.2024.00876 ↗