3DCastleBenchy: a process-independent benchmark for additive manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose The 3DCastleBenchy has been developed to facilitate wider adoption and use of additive manufacturing benchmarking artefacts which encourage both technical and non-technical users and designers to connect the growing number of technologies available. This tool will help people working with additive manufacturing to gain understanding of the limitations and design rules for each process. Design/methodology/approach Benchmarking is of critical importance for additive manufacturing, allowing for comparisons between technology capability, process optimisation and design guidelines. This work presents the 3DCastleBenchy, a design which balances aesthetic appeal and specific, measurable features which can be used for comparing various additive manufacturing processes. Findings The benchmark design was fabricated with three fundamentally different metal additive processes, laser-directed energy deposition (L-DED), laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) and metal extrusion (MEX). These resulting parts were then analysed, thereby allowing common defects and limitations of each process to be identified, namely, the overhang limitations of traditional L-DED, the cracking that can occur in L-PBF and the deposition tool path artefacts present in MEX. Originality/value Existing benchmarks typically focus on either tolerance engineering features, or they are purely artistic/demonstrative pieces. The 3DCastleBenchy has been designed to find a balance between these objectives to facilitate communication of design for additive manufacturing concepts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Directed energy deposition (DED) process: state of the art10.1007/s40684-020-00302-7 ↗
2. Revealing the interrelation between combined process parameters and geometrical deviations for building dimensionally stable and dense thin-walls using laser directed energy deposition10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.112105 ↗
3. Laser directed energy deposition of bulk 316L stainless steel10.1007/s40516-020-00128-w ↗
4. Assessing laser powder bed fusion system geometric errors through artifact-based methods10.1016/j.promfg.2021.06.042 ↗
5. Design for metal powder bed fusion: the geometry for additive part selection (GAPS) worksheet10.1016/j.addma.2020.101163 ↗
6. MeshLab: an Open-Source mesh processing tool
7. #3DBenchy.com [WWW document]
8. Test artefacts for additive manufacturing: a design methodology review10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.09.008 ↗
9. Interplay between powder catchment efficiency and layer height in self-stabilized laser metal deposition10.1016/j.optlaseng.2021.106817 ↗
10. SpringerLINK ebooks - Engineering · 2015
11. Additive manufacturing – test artefacts – geometric capability assessment of additive manufacturing systems
12. L-PBF of 4340 low alloy steel: influence of feedstock powder, layer thickness, and machine maintenance10.1007/s11665-018-3739-2 ↗
13. Effect of surface geometry on laser powder bed fusion defects10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117179 ↗
14. Geometrical metrology for metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.cirp.2019.05.004 ↗
15. Geometrical benchmarking of laser powder bed fusion systems based on designer needs10.1017/pds.2021.427 ↗
16. Proposal for a standardized test artifact for additive. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp
17. Investigation of dimensional and geometrical tolerances of laser powder directed energy deposition process10.1016/j.precisioneng.2023.10.006 ↗
18. Rapidia (2023), “Printing with metal paste deposition [WWW document]”, Rapidia, available at: www.rapidia.com/technology (accessed 2 October 0224).
19. A review on benchmark artifacts for evaluating the geometrical performance of additive manufacturing processes10.1007/s00170-017-0570-0 ↗
20. On the development of a novel benchmark design for crack quantification in additive manufacturing
21. A step-by-step guide to the L-PBF process10.1016/B978-0-12-824090-8.00026-3 ↗