journal article·2025-09-24Open access

Fabrication and characterization of an agarose and GelMA hybrid scaffold for adipose tissue regeneration

Ana Margarida Teixeira, Lana Van Damme, Sandra Van Vlierberghe, Pedro Alexandre Lopes de Sousa Martins

Rapid Prototyping Journal· Volume 31· Issue 9

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to overcome the drawbacks of current clinical practices in breast reconstruction. Tissue engineering is currently the most promising field to create improved alternatives and new strategies. Biomaterials that mimic the physico-chemical and biological properties of the native extracellular matrix (ECM), e.g. hydrogels, have been characterized and seeded with cells, with the purpose of promoting the regeneration of tissues. In this study, a new hydrogel blend was produced and characterized for adipose tissue regeneration purposes. Design/methodology/approach Blends of agarose and gelatin-methacryloyl (GelMA) were produced in different weight percentage ratios (100:0, 75:25 and 50:50 of agarose:GelMA). Indirect 3D printed scaffolds and 2D discs were fabricated and characterized in terms of physico-chemical and biological properties in the presence of adipose tissue-derived stem cells. Findings Both scaffolds and discs presented a good gel fraction (>90% for most of the samples) and a swelling degree >17% for all samples. In terms of stiffness, the results varied from 2.86 kPa to 25.11 kPa depending on the testing conditions (i.e. testing temperature) and sample chemical composition. Rheology analysis showed that the storage modulus was higher than the loss modulus, indicating a more elastic behavior. Moreover, the scaffolds with GelMA could support cell adhesion and proliferation, with a viability higher than the control (i.e. tissue culture plastic, TCP) by day 14 (118% and 128% for the ratios 75:25 and 50:50, respectively), showing that 50:50 is the optimum ratio composition. Originality/value The blend of agarose GelMA presented in this study offers a new and promising approach toward adipose tissue regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (INEGI) Associated Laboratory of Energy, Transports and Aeronautics (LAETA), , Porto, ; Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, and Polymer Chemistry and Biomaterials Group, Centre of Macromolecular Chemistry (CMaC), Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Ghent University Polymer Chemistry and Biomaterials Group, Centre of Macromolecular Chemistry (CMaC), Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, , Ghent,

Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (INEGI) Associated Laboratory of Energy, Transports and Aeronautics (LAETA), , Porto, , and Aragonese Foundation for Research and Development (ARAID), Instituto de Investigación en Ingeniería de Aragón (i3A), Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Acoustic and mechanical characterization of 3D-printed scaffolds for tissue engineering applications10.1088/1748-605X/aad417 ↗
2. Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived adult stem cells in agarose, alginate, and gelatin scaffolds10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.045 ↗
3. Textural properties of agarose gels. I. rheological and fracture properties10.1016/j.foodhyd.2005.02.019 ↗
4. Natural and synthetic polymeric hydrogel: a bioink for 3d bioprinting of tissue models10.1016/j.jddst.2024.106204 ↗
5. The effect of concentration, thermal history and cell seeding density on the initial mechanical properties of agarose hydrogels10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.12.007 ↗
6. Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels10.1021/bm990017d ↗
7. Three-dimensional bioprinting in soft tissue engineering for plastic and reconstructive surgery10.3390/bioengineering10101232 ↗
8. Noncompressive MR elastography of breasts
9. 3D printing breast tissue models: a review of past work and directions for future work10.3390/mi10080501 ↗
10. Experimental validation of a flat punch indentation methodology calibrated against unconfined compression tests for determination of soft tissue biomechanics10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.02.019 ↗
11. On the effectiveness of oxygen plasma and alkali surface treatments to modify the properties of polylactic acid scaffolds10.3390/polym13101643 ↗
12. Breast reconstruction with a tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approach (systematic review)10.1007/s10439-019-02373-3 ↗
13. Development of agarose–gelatin bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and cell encapsulation10.1088/1748-605X/ac759f ↗
14. Rheological and thermal properties of agarose aqueous solutions and hydrogels10.1002/polb.21370 ↗
15. Preparation and characterization of agarose-gelatin blend hydrogels as a cell encapsulation matrix: an in-vitro study10.1080/00222348.2012.657110 ↗
16. Extraction, modification and biomedical application of agarose hydrogels: a review10.3390/md21050299 ↗
17. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression10.1177/016173469802000403 ↗
18. Three-dimensional sulfated bacterial cellulose/gelatin composite scaffolds for culturing hepatocytes10.34133/cbsystems.0021 ↗
19. Hybrid tissue engineering scaffolds by combination of Three-Dimensional printing and cell photoencapsulation10.1115/1.4031466 ↗
20. Measurement of elastic property of breast tissue for elasticity imaging10.1109/ULTSYM.2009.5442044 ↗
21. Recent advances and future directions in postmastectomy breast reconstruction10.1016/j.clbc.2018.02.004 ↗
22. Laser fabrication of 3D gelatin scaffolds for the generation of bioartificial tissues10.3390/ma4010288 ↗
23. Vascularized adipose tissue engineering: moving towards soft tissue reconstruction10.1088/1758-5090/acd7a5 ↗
24. Surface-attached hydrogel coatings via c,h-insertion crosslinking for biomedical and bioanalytical applications (review)10.1116/1.4999786 ↗
25. Synthesis of an agarose-gelatin conjugate for use as a tissue engineering scaffold10.1263/jbb.103.22 ↗
26. Mussel-inspired agarose hydrogel scaffolds for skin tissue engineering10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.004 ↗
27. Teixeira, A.M. (2018), “Mechanical characterisation of an organic phantom candidate for breast tissue”, available at:Link to the cited article
28. Mechanical characterisation of an organic phantom candidate for breast tissue10.1177/0885328219895738 ↗
29. A review of bioengineering techniques applied to breast tissue: mechanical properties, tissue engineering and finite element analysis10.3389/fbioe.2023.1161815 ↗
30. A biocompatible diazosulfonate initiator for direct encapsulation of human stem cells: via two-photon polymerization10.1039/c8py00278a ↗
31. Extrusion-based 3D printing of photo-crosslinkable gelatin and κ-carrageenan hydrogel blends for adipose tissue regeneration10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.124 ↗
32. Indirect versus direct 3d printing of hydrogel scaffolds for adipose tissue regeneration10.1557/adv.2020.117 ↗
33. Toward adipose tissue engineering using thiol-norbornene photo-crosslinkable gelatin hydrogels10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00189 ↗
34. Indirect additive manufacturing as an elegant tool for the production of self-supporting low density gelatin scaffolds10.1007/s10856-015-5566-4 ↗
35. Initial in vivo experience with steady-state subzone-based MR elastography of the human breast10.1002/jmri.10232 ↗
36. Unraveling of advances in 3d-printed polymer-based bone scaffolds10.3390/polym14030566 ↗
37. Agarose-based biomaterials for tissue engineering10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.060 ↗
38. Tuning the mechanics of 3D-printed scaffolds by crystal lattice-like structural design for breast tissue engineering10.1088/1758-5090/ab52ea ↗
39. Impact of hydrogel stiffness on differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cell microspheroids10.1089/ten.tea.2018.0237 ↗