Calculating probability of detection of short surface cracks using inductive thermography
Source abstract
Abstract
Inductive thermography experiments on artificial defects were used to calculate the POD of this inspection technique. In nickel-based austenitic superalloy samples defects in the range of 0.3–1.9 mm length and with 0.25–1.5 mm depth were inspected. 11 samples, each of them with 9 different defects, were used for the experiments. Additionally, finite element simulations were carried out to support the POD calculation and in order to investigate how different parameters affect the results. The measured and the simulated temperature sequences were evaluated by Fourier transform to a phase image, and the signal-to-noise ratio of the phase contrast around the crack was used as signal â for the â versus a POD calculation. As the phase contrast depends not only on the defect length but also on the defect depth, POD depending on both variables was calculated, which can be visualised as a POD surface. Finally, experimental results on samples with real cracks (fatigue cracks and cracks obtained through the Varestraint test machine) were compared to the results obtained by the FEM simulation and in the experiments for the artificial defects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chair of Automation, University of Leoben, Leoben, Austria
Lortek SCOOP, Digitalization Technologies, Ordizia, Spain
GKN Aerospace Engine Systems, Trollhättan, Sweden
Funding
Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM International. ASTM-E2862 -18 - Standard Practice for Probability of Detection Analysis for Hit/Miss Data, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States; 2018.
2. ASTM International. ASTM-E3023 - 15 - Standard Practice for Probability of Detection Analysis for â versus a Data. West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States; 2015.
3. 10.1007/s10921-019-0628-z10.1007/s10921-019-0628-z ↗
4. Nondestructive Evaluation System Reliability Assessment. Department of defense handbook MIL-HDBK-1823. AMSC N/A AREA NDTI. 1999. Available from: http://www.statisticalengineering.com/mh1823/MIL-HDBK-1823A2009.pdf.
5. 10.1080/17686733.2016.114584210.1080/17686733.2016.1145842 ↗
6. Gorostegui-Colinas E, Muniategui A, de Uralde PL, et al., “A novel automatic defect detection method for electron beam welded inconel 718 components using inductive thermography. Proceedings of the 14th Quantitative InfraRed Thermography Conference; 2018 June 25-29; Berlin; 2019.
7. 10.1007/978-3-319-28434-7_110.1007/978-3-319-28434-7_1 ↗
8. 10.1007/978-3-319-28434-7_110.1007/978-3-319-28434-7_1 ↗
9. 10.3390/app802025710.3390/app8020257 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.03.00910.1016/j.ndteint.2012.03.009 ↗
11. 10.3166/qirt.6.3-1910.3166/qirt.6.3-19 ↗
12. 10.1080/17686733.2016.122924610.1080/17686733.2016.1229246 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.03.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2016.03.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.03.05910.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.03.059 ↗
15. Meyer RM Lareau JP Crawford SL et al. Review of literature for model assisted probability of detection PNNL-23714. 2014.10.2172/1183633 ↗
16. 10.1080/09349847.2013.77940110.1080/09349847.2013.779401 ↗
17. 10.1080/17686733.2019.159239110.1080/17686733.2019.1592391 ↗
18. 10.1080/17686733.2021.195322610.1080/17686733.2021.1953226 ↗
19. 10.1117/12.255685310.1117/12.2556853 ↗