journal article·2024-01

Breast cancer classification on thermograms using deep CNN and transformers

Ella Mahoro, Moulay A. Akhloufi

Publisher page

Abstract

Breast thermography is a screening approach for breast cancer detection by measuring the breast skin temperature. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and can affect either women or men. Its early diagnosis and treatment reduce deaths and increase survival chances. The use of deep learning algorithms and techniques has made it easier to detect breast cancer in its early stages, but some challenges remain. In this work, we propose a breast cancer detection system. In the first step, TransUNet, a vision-based Transformer, is used to segment the breast region and separate it from the rest of the body. In the second step, four different models such as EfficientNet-B7, ResNet-50, VGG-16 and DenseNet-201 are used to classify the dataset into three types: healthy, sick, and unknown. The best accuracy achieved is 97.26%, sensitivity of 97.26% and specificity of each class healthy, sick, unknown is 100%, 96.94% and 99.72% respectively with the ResNet-50 model.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrared Thermography in Medicine · AI in cancer detection · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Perception, Robotics and Intelligent Machines Research Group (PRIME), Department of Computer Science, Université de Moncton, 18 Antonine-Maillet Ave, Moncton, NB E1A 3E9, Canada

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Mayo Clinic. Breast cancer 2022. [cited 2022 June 30]. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/breast-cancer/symptoms-causes/syc-20352470
2. Breastcancer.org. Genetic. 2022 [cited 2022 June 30]. Available from: https://www.breastcancer.org/risk/risk-factors/genetics
3. 10.1126/science.793963010.1126/science.7939630 ↗
4. MedicineNet. Breast cancer prevention. 2022 [cited 2022 June 30]. Available from: https://www.medicinenet.com/breastcancerprevention/article.htm
5. 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.05.01410.1016/j.jacr.2007.05.014 ↗
6. Dongola N. Mammography in breast cancer. 2018 [cited 2022 June 30] . Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/346529-overview
7. Mayo Clinic. Mammogram. 2022 [cited 2022 June 30]. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/mammogram/about/pac-20384806
8. Holistic Breast Health. Comparison of breast screenings. 2022 [cited 2022 June 30]. Available from: https://holisticbreasthealth.com/good-breast-health/compare-breast-screenings/
9. Burke E. Mammography vs. Thermography: which is better at detecting breast can-cer? 2022 [cited 2022 June 30]. Available from: https://www.wakerad.com/expert-feature/Mammography-vs-thermography-which-is-better-at-detecting-breast-cancer/
10. Cowley G Veazey K. Comparing mammography and thermography. 2022 [cited 2022 June 30]. Available from: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/316632
11. 10.1109/51.84437810.1109/51.844378 ↗
12. 10.3389/fpubh.2014.0008710.3389/fpubh.2014.00087 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02143-110.1016/S0140-6736(99)02143-1 ↗
14. 10.1093/bib/bbx04410.1093/bib/bbx044 ↗
15. Khan M-H-M, Boodoo-Jahangeer N, Dullull W, et al. Multi-Class classification of breast cancer abnormalities using deep convolutional neural network (CNN). PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0256500.10.1371/journal.pone.0256500 ↗
16. 10.1186/s40537-019-0192-510.1186/s40537-019-0192-5 ↗
17. Kösters JP, Gøtzsche PC. Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2.
18. 10.1371/journal.pone.024970510.1371/journal.pone.0249705 ↗
19. Kalaf JM. Mammography: a history of success and scientific enthusiasm. Radiologia Brasileira. 2014;47:7–8.
20. 10.1258/jms.2012.01112310.1258/jms.2012.011123 ↗
21. 10.1590/2446-4740.0521710.1590/2446-4740.05217 ↗
22. Torres-Galván J, Guevara E, González FJ. Comparison of deep learning architectures for pre-screening of breast cancer thermograms. 2019 Photonics North (PN). 2019;CFP1909V-ART:1–2.
23. 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.10954210.1016/j.mehy.2019.109542 ↗
24. 10.1109/JSYST.2013.228313510.1109/JSYST.2013.2283135 ↗
25. 10.3390/electronics1020253810.3390/electronics10202538 ↗
26. 10.1109/SIBGRAPI.2018.0002910.1109/SIBGRAPI.2018.00029 ↗
27. 10.1080/17686733.2021.202501810.1080/17686733.2021.2025018 ↗
28. 10.1080/17686733.2021.191851410.1080/17686733.2021.1918514 ↗
29. 10.1109/ISACC.2015.737734310.1109/ISACC.2015.7377343 ↗
30. 10.21595/vp.2019.2097810.21595/vp.2019.20978 ↗
31. Milosevic M, Jankovic D, Peulic A. Thermography based breast cancer detection using texture features and minimum variance quantization. Excli J. 2014;13:1204.
32. 10.3390/s2114480210.3390/s21144802 ↗
33. 10.1371/journal.pone.026234910.1371/journal.pone.0262349 ↗
34. Chen J Lu Y Yu Q et al. Transunet: transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04306. 2021.
35. 10.1166/jmihi.2014.122610.1166/jmihi.2014.1226 ↗
36. Tan M Le QV. Efficientnet: rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. CoRR. 2019. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11946
37. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.10118210.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101182 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.01110.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.011 ↗
39. 10.3390/s2105168810.3390/s21051688 ↗
40. Simonyan K Zisserman A Zisserman A. Learning local feature descriptors using convex optimisation. 2014. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556.10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2301163 ↗
41. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.24310.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00138-019-01042-810.1007/s00138-019-01042-8 ↗
43. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.7410.1109/ICCV.2017.74 ↗