Comparative study of active infrared thermography, ultrasonic laser vibrometry and laser ultrasonics in application to the inspection of graphite/epoxy composite parts
Source abstract
Abstract
Three nondestructive testing techniques, namely, optically- and ultrasonically stimulated infrared thermography, ultrasonic laser vibrometry and laser ultrasonics, have been comparatively investigated in the inspection of a graphite-epoxy sample characterized by a complicated geometry to demonstrate advantages and drawbacks of each technique in the detection of different types of defects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Thermal Testing Laboratory, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia
Laser Center, ILC M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Optoacoustics Laboratory, NUST MISIS, Moscow, Russia
Laser Acoustics Laboratory, ILIT RAS – Branch of the FSRC «Crystallography and Photonics» RAS, Shatura, Russia
Laboratory for quality control in materials and structures, Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10765-017-2333-410.1007/s10765-017-2333-4 ↗
2. 10.1080/17686733.2017.133689910.1080/17686733.2017.1336899 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.02310.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.023 ↗
4. 10.1080/17686733.2017.133165510.1080/17686733.2017.1331655 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.02610.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.026 ↗
6. 10.1134/S106183091807007010.1134/S1061830918070070 ↗
7. 10.1134/S106183091702009710.1134/S1061830917020097 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.498528610.1063/1.4985286 ↗
9. Hettler J · J Nondestr Eval · 2017 · 36
10. Balageas D · J Nondestr Eval · 2016 · 35 · 1
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.018 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.11.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2013.11.003 ↗
13. Vavilov V · Proc SPIE · 2014 · 9105 · 1
14. 10.1016/j.infrared.2013.07.01110.1016/j.infrared.2013.07.011 ↗
15. Solodov I · Appl Phys Lett · 2011 · 99 · 109
16. 10.1016/j.infrared.2015.12.02610.1016/j.infrared.2015.12.026 ↗
17. Castanedo CI · Proc SPIE · 2007 · 6541 · 1
18. 10.1109/TII.2015.247985610.1109/TII.2015.2479856 ↗
19. Abdulrahman YA · Compos Nondestr Eval · 2017 · 72 · 1
20. Scruby CB · 1990
21. 10.1007/978-1-4615-2848-7_6410.1007/978-1-4615-2848-7_64 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.171160210.1063/1.1711602 ↗
23. Pelivanov I · J Appl Phys · 2014 · 115
24. Podymova NB · 2014 · 10
25. Karabutov AA · J Nondestr Eval · 2014 · 33 · 141
26. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.03.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2015.03.003 ↗
27. 10.1134/S106183091804004610.1134/S1061830918040046 ↗