journal article·2020-03Open access

Evaluation of effectiveness of 45S5 bioglass doped with niobium for repairing critical‐sized bone defect in in vitro and in vivo models

Lucas P. L. de Souza, João H. Lopes, Filipe V. Ferreira, Richard A. Martin, Celso A. Bertran, José A. Camilli

Abstract

Abstract Here, we investigated the biocompatibility of a bioactive sodium calcium silicate glass containing 2.6 mol% Nb2O5 (denoted BGPN2.6) and compare the results with the archetypal 45S5 bioglass. The glass bioactivity was tested using a range of in vitro and in vivo experiments to assess its suitability for bone regeneration applications. in vitro studies consisted of assessing the cytocompatibility of the BGPN2.6 glass with bone‐marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM‐MSCs). Systemic biocompatibility was verified by means of the quantification of biochemical markers and histopathology of liver, kidneys, and muscles. The glass genotoxicity was assessed using the micronucleus test. The regeneration of a calvarial defect was assessed using both qualitative and quantitative analysis of three‐dimensional microcomputed tomography images. The BGPN2.6 glass was not cytotoxic to BM‐MSCs. It is systemically biocompatible causing no signs of damage to high metabolic and excretory organs such as the liver and kidneys. No mutagenic potential was observed in the micronucleus test. MicroCT images showed that BGPN2.6 was able to nearly fully regenerate a critical‐sized calvarial defect and was far superior to standard 45S5 Bioglass. Defects filled with BGPN2.6 glass showed over 90% coverage compare to just 66% for 45S5 Bioglass. For one animal the defect was completely filled in 8 weeks. These results clearly show that Nb‐containing bioactive glasses are a safe and effective biomaterial for bone replacement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Structural and Functional Biology Institute of Biology, University of Campinas – UNICAMP Campinas Brazil

Department of Chemistry, Division of Fundamental Sciences (IEF) Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA) Sao Jose dos Campos Brazil

School of Chemical Engineering University of Campinas – UNICAMP Campinas Brazil

School of Engineering and Aston Institute of Materials Research Aston University Birmingham UK

Department of Physical Chemistry Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas – UNICAMP Campinas Brazil

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · Universidade Estadual de Campinas

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.05810.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.058 ↗
2. 10.1088/1748-6041/11/1/01500610.1088/1748-6041/11/1/015006 ↗
3. 10.1002/jbm.b.3029510.1002/jbm.b.30295 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10856-014-5153-010.1007/s10856-014-5153-0 ↗
5. Clinically applied models of bone regeneration in tissue engineering research
6. 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.16410.1038/nrrheum.2014.164 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.03510.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.035 ↗
8. 10.1201/b1735910.1201/b17359 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10019000005510.1007/s100190000055 ↗
10. 10.1002/jbm.82005061110.1002/jbm.820050611 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-410.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.02310.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10856-017-5976-610.1007/s10856-017-5976-6 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.01010.1016/j.dental.2011.10.010 ↗
15. Lopes J. H. · 2016
16. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.04410.1016/j.msec.2016.11.044 ↗
17. 10.1111/jace.1322210.1111/jace.13222 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.02810.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.028 ↗
19. 10.1111/jace.1230510.1111/jace.12305 ↗
20. 10.1002/jbm.b.3448610.1002/jbm.b.34486 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.etap.2012.08.01210.1016/j.etap.2012.08.012 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10856-008-3661-510.1007/s10856-008-3661-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00275-110.1016/S0142-9612(00)00275-1 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.07.02810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.07.028 ↗
25. 10.2109/jcersj.109.1275_92910.2109/jcersj.109.1275_929 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02757.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02757.x ↗
27. 10.1021/am301614a10.1021/am301614a ↗
28. 10.3390/coatings101007210.3390/coatings1010072 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00128-008-9596-110.1007/s00128-008-9596-1 ↗
30. 10.1007/s11914-018-0432-110.1007/s11914-018-0432-1 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41598-018-31114-010.1038/s41598-018-31114-0 ↗
32. 10.1038/nprot.2012.11310.1038/nprot.2012.113 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.03.03810.1016/j.actbio.2015.03.038 ↗
34. 10.3390/ijms1603577910.3390/ijms16035779 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10856-016-5755-910.1007/s10856-016-5755-9 ↗
36. 10.1002/jbm.b.3127310.1002/jbm.b.31273 ↗
37. 10.3109/15376516.2013.84311010.3109/15376516.2013.843110 ↗