Bond strength determination of hydroxyapatite coatings on Ti‐6Al‐4V substrates using the LAser Shock Adhesion Test (LASAT)
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract An adhesion test procedure applied to plasma‐sprayed hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings to measure the “LASAT threshold” (LAser Shock Adhesion test) is described. The good repeatability and minimal discrepancy of the laser‐driven adhesion test data were ascertained for conventional plasma sprayed HA coatings. As a further demonstration, the procedure was applied to HA coatings with diverse characteristics on the ceramic/metal interface. Different preheating and grit blasting conditions and the presence of a thick plasma‐sprayed Ti sublayer or a thin TiO2 layer prepared by oxidation were investigated through LASAT. It was assessed that a rough surface can significantly improve the coating's bond strength. However, it was also demonstrated that a thin TiO2 layer on a smooth Ti‐6Al‐4V substrate can have a major influence on adhesion as well. Preheating up to 270°C just prior to the first HA spraying pass had no effect on the adhesion strength. Further development of the procedure was done to achieve an in situ LASAT with in vitro conditions applied on HA coatings. To that end, different crystalline HA contents were soaked in simulated body fluid (SBF). Beyond the demonstration of the capability of this laser‐driven adhesion test devoted to HA coatings in dry or liquid environment, the present study provided empirical information on pertinent processing characteristics that could strengthen or weaken the HA/Ti‐6Al‐4V bond. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2010.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.01810.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.018 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.04.05210.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.04.052 ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0264900310.1007/BF02649003 ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.82025100410.1002/jbm.820251004 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00103-310.1016/S0142-9612(98)00103-3 ↗
6. 10.1023/A:100882230948610.1023/A:1008822309486 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0040-6090(03)00810-110.1016/S0040-6090(03)00810-1 ↗
8. 10.1142/9789814317351_001110.1142/9789814317351_0011 ↗
9. 10.1520/STP38629S10.1520/STP38629S ↗
10. 10.1016/0921-5093(90)90116-K10.1016/0921-5093(90)90116-K ↗
11. 10.1163/156856194X0044710.1163/156856194X00447 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0241105410.1007/BF02411054 ↗
13. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980915)41:4<624::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-E10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980915)41:4<624::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
14. 10.1051/epjap:199912310.1051/epjap:1999123 ↗
15. 10.1051/epjap:200017010.1051/epjap:2000170 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.diamond.2004.11.02510.1016/j.diamond.2004.11.025 ↗
17. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000021445.74736.b310.1023/B:JMSC.0000021445.74736.b3 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2003.12.08410.1016/j.vacuum.2003.12.084 ↗
19. BoileauS GuipontV JeandinM NivardM BertheL JeromeJ BoustieM LiH KhorKA. The laser shock adhesion (LASAT) for production control of thermally‐sprayed ceramic coatings. In: Thermal Spray Connects: Explore its Surfacing Potential. Proceedings International Thermal Spray Conference and Exposition (ITSC 2005) Basel Switzerland: DVS‐Verlag; 2–4 May 2005. p7.10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2005p1047 ↗
20. Failure strength measurements of VPS tungsten coatings for HAPL first wall armor10.13182/FST07-A1603 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.08.22210.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.08.222 ↗
22. 10.1163/15685610677714433610.1163/156856106777144336 ↗
23. BansardS KhorKA BoritF GuipontV JeandinM NivardM BertheL. Investigation of the interface strength of hydroxyapatite coating by the LASAT (Laser Shock Adhesion Test) method. In: Thermal Spray 2006: Building on 100 Years of Success 2006. Proceedings 2006 International Thermal Spray Conference Seattle WA USA 15–18 May 2006. Germany: DVS‐Verlag;2006. p6.
24. 10.2320/matertrans.48.79310.2320/matertrans.48.793 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.06.06610.1016/j.tsf.2007.06.066 ↗
26. 10.1088/0022-3727/40/10/01910.1088/0022-3727/40/10/019 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.37055310.1063/1.370553 ↗
28. 10.1023/A:100884002690710.1023/A:1008840026907 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11666-009-9294-510.1007/s11666-009-9294-5 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.34399110.1063/1.343991 ↗
31. Marsh SP · 1980
32. 10.1002/jbm.82024060710.1002/jbm.820240607 ↗
33. BoustieM ArrigoniM JeromeJ. The flier laser shock adhesion test as an extension of the lasat test for thick coating/strate systems. In: Proceedings 18th International Conference on Surface Modification Technologies (SMT XVIII); Dijon; France; 15–17 Nov. 2004 Pub. ASM International;2006. p271–275.10.1201/9781003423874-62 ↗
34. 10.1016/0257-8972(95)02540-510.1016/0257-8972(95)02540-5 ↗
35. BahbouF NylenP. Relationship between surface topography parameters and adhesion strength for plasma spraying. In: Thermal spray connects: Explore its surfacing potential. Proceedings International Thermal Spray Conference and Exposition (ITSC 2005) Basel Switzerland 2–4 May 2005. Publ: DVS‐Verlag;2005. p5.10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2005p1027 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.09.04010.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.09.040 ↗
37. 10.1007/BF0012026810.1007/BF00120268 ↗
38. 10.1002/jbm.a.1014510.1002/jbm.a.10145 ↗
39. 10.1007/BF0005898310.1007/BF00058983 ↗