journal article·2008-05

Structure–property relations and cytotoxicity of isosorbide‐based biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for tissue repair and regeneration

Sylwester Gogolewski, Katarzyna Gorna, Ewa Zaczynska, Anna Czarny

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Microporous scaffolds with potential applications for tissue engineering were produced from the biodegradable aliphatic isosorbide‐based polyurethane using a combined salt leaching–solvent evaporation–coagulation process. Alkaline sodium phosphate heptahydrate crystals were used as a solid porogene, and acetone–water mixture was used as a nonsolvent–coagulant. The scaffolds used in this study had interconnected pores with sizes in the range of 70–120 μm and a pore‐to‐volume ratio of 87%. The XPS measurements showed that the residence of the scaffold in an aqueous solution of the alkaline porogene changed its surface atomic composition, that is increased the surface concentration of oxygen and nitrogen and reduced the surface concentration of hydrocarbons relative to the control material. This also enhanced the hydrophilicity of the scaffold's surfaces as assessed from contact angle measurements. The alkaline porogene did not affect the polymer's molecular weight. The MTT cytotoxicity assay showed that the isosorbide‐based polyurethane scaffold is noncytotoxic. The amounts of interleukin‐6 and interlukin‐8 proinflammatory cytokines released from human blood leukocytes exposed to the polyurethane scaffolds in vitro were comparable and/or lower than the amount of the cytokines released by leukocytes exposed to the culture‐grade polystyrene control. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 2008
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/jbm.1010010.1002/jbm.10100 ↗
2. 10.1002/jbm.a.1014810.1002/jbm.a.10148 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00210-510.1016/S0141-3910(01)00210-5 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00363-410.1016/S0141-3910(02)00363-4 ↗
5. 10.1002/jbm.a.3070810.1002/jbm.a.30708 ↗
6. Polyurethane membranes as a scaffold for the generation of articular cartilage graft
7. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00462-910.1016/S0142-9612(03)00462-9 ↗
8. HillChM KangQK HartsockL AnYH GogolewskiS GornaK. Osteogenesis of osteoblast‐seeded polyurethane‐hydroxyapatite scaffolds in nude mice. Transactions 30th Annual Society for Biomaterials Meeting Memphis TN April 27–30 2005. Vol. 28 p358.
9. 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-410.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4 ↗
10. 10.1002/sia.74010080310.1002/sia.740100803 ↗
11. 10.1163/156856290X0005310.1163/156856290X00053 ↗
12. 10.1002/jbm.82025110610.1002/jbm.820251106 ↗
13. 10.1002/jbm.82026060910.1002/jbm.820260609 ↗
14. 10.1116/1.124780910.1116/1.1247809 ↗
15. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990315)44:4<371::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-I10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990315)44:4<371::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
16. An X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of biomedical polyurethane modified using low‐power plasma
17. 10.1006/jcis.2002.826210.1006/jcis.2002.8262 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.132110.1002/app.1321 ↗
19. 10.1002/jbm.82018091710.1002/jbm.820180917 ↗
20. 10.1016/0142-9612(90)90089-910.1016/0142-9612(90)90089-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/0142-9612(92)90114-410.1016/0142-9612(92)90114-4 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0169-409X(98)00023-410.1016/S0169-409X(98)00023-4 ↗
23. Correlation of cytokine elaboration with mononuclear cell adhesion to platelet storage bag plastic polymers: A pilot study10.1128/CDLI.6.4.509-513.1999 ↗
24. 10.1097/00004770-200309000-0001010.1097/00004770-200309000-00010 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.16212419910.1073/pnas.162124199 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.a.1042510.1002/jbm.a.10425 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00097-810.1016/S0142-9612(03)00097-8 ↗
28. 10.1002/jbm.a.3016510.1002/jbm.a.30165 ↗