journal article·2019-01

Enhanced chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on gelatin/glycosaminoglycan electrospun nanofibers with different amount of glycosaminoglycan

Ali Honarpardaz, Shiva Irani, Mohamad Pezeshki‐Modaress, Mojgan Zandi, Amin Sadeghi

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Tissue engineering is a new technique to help damaged cartilage treatment using cells and scaffolds. In this study we tried to evaluate electrospun scaffolds composed of gelatin/glycosaminoglycan (G/GAG) blend nanofibers in chondrogenesis of bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs). Scaffolds were fabricated by electrospinning technique with different concentration of glycosaminoglycan (0%, 5%, 10%, and 15%) in gelatin matrix. BMMSCs were cultured on the scaffolds for chondrogenesis process. MTT assay was done for scaffold's biocompatibility and cells viability evaluation. Alcian blue staining was carried out to determine the release of GAG and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) was done for expression ofCOL2A1and also immunocytochemistry assay were used to confirm expression of type II collagen. Scaffold with 15% GAG showed better result for biocompatibility (p=0.02). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs showed that MSCs have good attachment to the scaffolds. Alcian blue staining result confirmed that cells produce GAG during differentiation time different from GAG in the scaffolds. Also the results for RT‐PCR showed the expression ofCOL2A1marker. Immunocytochemistry assay for type II collagen confirm that this protein expressed. Scaffold comprising 15% GAG is better results for chondrogenesis and it can be a good applicant for cartilage tissue engineering. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 38–48, 2019.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch Islamic Azad University Tehran Iran

Burn Research Center Iran University of Medical Science Tehran Iran

Department of Biomaterials Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute Tehran Iran

Soft Tissue Engineering Research Center Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Institute, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University Tehran Iran

Funding

Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.joca.2004.04.00710.1016/j.joca.2004.04.007 ↗
2. 10.2106/00004623-200106000-0000310.2106/00004623-200106000-00003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.00510.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.005 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addr.2014.08.01010.1016/j.addr.2014.08.010 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11999-016-4715-510.1007/s11999-016-4715-5 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11010-017-3047-410.1007/s11010-017-3047-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.01510.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.015 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.12410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.124 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.05.16810.1016/j.jconrel.2015.05.168 ↗
10. 10.3727/09636890878657646210.3727/096368908786576462 ↗
11. 10.1089/scd.2008.001710.1089/scd.2008.0017 ↗
12. Role of mesenchymal stem cells in tissue engineering of meniscus10.1002/jbm.a.32796 ↗
13. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.021810.1089/ten.tea.2010.0218 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.01610.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.016 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.03810.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.038 ↗
16. Mesenchymal stem cell‐based tissue engineering strategies for repair of articular cartilage
17. 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.03.008.110023062110.1016/j.orthres.2005.03.008.1100230621 ↗
18. 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.010910.1089/ten.tea.2008.0109 ↗
19. 10.1166/jnn.2013.743610.1166/jnn.2013.7436 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.09710.1016/j.msec.2015.12.097 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10856-011-4248-010.1007/s10856-011-4248-0 ↗
22. Biochemical and biophysical aspects of collagen nanostructure in the extracellular matrix10.33549/physiolres.931302 ↗
23. 10.1089/ten.tec.2015.028110.1089/ten.tec.2015.0281 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.01.00210.1016/j.tibtech.2016.01.002 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.01910.1016/j.msec.2016.02.019 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.04510.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 ↗
27. 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.046110.1089/ten.tea.2016.0461 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10719-016-9665-310.1007/s10719-016-9665-3 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.08210.1016/j.msec.2015.01.082 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.00510.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.005 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.04610.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.046 ↗
32. 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.009610.1089/ten.teb.2012.0096 ↗
33. 10.1021/bm701225a10.1021/bm701225a ↗
34. 10.1007/s10439-009-9704-310.1007/s10439-009-9704-3 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.02310.1016/j.msec.2014.12.023 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10561-013-9403-z10.1007/s10561-013-9403-z ↗
37. 10.1002/jbm.a.3589010.1002/jbm.a.35890 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.09.00510.1016/j.ymgme.2016.09.005 ↗
39. 10.2147/IJN.S2875310.2147/IJN.S28753 ↗
40. 10.3390/molecules1609723710.3390/molecules16097237 ↗
41. 10.1002/jbm.a.3029810.1002/jbm.a.30298 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.02210.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.022 ↗
43. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00138.x10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00138.x ↗
44. 10.1002/jcp.2016410.1002/jcp.20164 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cellbi.2007.08.00210.1016/j.cellbi.2007.08.002 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.00310.1016/j.msec.2016.10.003 ↗
47. 10.1002/jbm.a.3022110.1002/jbm.a.30221 ↗
48. 10.5301/jabfm.500030210.5301/jabfm.5000302 ↗
49. 10.1002/term.217010.1002/term.2170 ↗
50. 10.1088/1748-6041/4/4/04501210.1088/1748-6041/4/4/045012 ↗
51. 10.1186/ar307710.1186/ar3077 ↗
52. 10.1038/258327a010.1038/258327a0 ↗
53. 10.1002/bip.1973.36012060310.1002/bip.1973.360120603 ↗