Displacement rate dependence of acrylic adhesive bonded carbon/epoxy composite joints under mode I loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Acrylic adhesives offer design flexibility with its viscoelasticity. However, its use with composite parts has not been studied. In this regard, the aim of this work is to characterise the mode I delamination of acrylic adhesive bonded composite joints subjected to various displacement rates. This study used carbon/epoxy composite as the adherent and 3M adhesive film (VHB 4930F) as the adhesive. Double cantilever beam test was conducted and the mode I fracture toughness GIC was calculated using the simple beam theory. Results show that GIC increases with displacement rate. The maximum GIC is achieved at 500 mm/min, with 155% increment compared to the GIC at 5 mm/min. Furthermore, the cohesive failure is found to be more dominating as the displacement rate increases. Through the quantification of the cohesive area, it is noticed that both GIC and cohesive area correlate well. Both parameters are well fitted using the proposed rate-dependent model.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Faculty of Engineering and Science, Curtin University Malaysia, Miri, Malaysia
Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton Malaysia, Iskandar Puteri, Malaysia
Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Funding
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1186/s40563-018-0116-110.1186/s40563-018-0116-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
3. Da Silva LF · Handb Adhes Technol · 2018 · 1
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10729310.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107293 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.06.01710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.06.017 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.03210.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.032 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.11.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.11.006 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.07.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.07.013 ↗
9. 10.1186/s40563-017-0087-710.1186/s40563-017-0087-7 ↗
10. 10.1080/01694243.2018.154636410.1080/01694243.2018.1546364 ↗
11. Ebnesajjad S · 2014
12. Blackman BR, Kinloch AJ. Protocol for the determination of the Mode I adhesive fracture energy, GIc, of structural adhesives using the double cantilever beam (DCB) and tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) specimens. Version 00-08. European Structural Integrity Society Polymers, Adhesives and Composites TC4 Committee 2000.
13. 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00031-010.1016/S0013-7944(02)00031-0 ↗
14. Johar M, Asasaari SFM, Tamin MN. Strain rate-dependent deformation and failure process of adhesive joints. 36th International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Conference; 2014.10.1109/IEMT.2014.7123133 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.03310.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.033 ↗
16. 10.1177/002199831668230910.1177/0021998316682309 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.013 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.05.00610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.05.006 ↗
19. 10.1163/016942410X50771310.1163/016942410X507713 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.05.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.05.001 ↗