journal article·2021-02

A Quasi-classical Model for Delineation of Dynamical States and Chaotic Maps in a Spaser

Morteza A. Sharif, K. Ashabi

Plasmonics· Volume 16· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, a quasi-classical model is proposed and developed for a surface plasmon (SP) nanolaser (spaser) system. The system is assumed to be composed of two-level quantum dots (QDs) coupled with a/an damping/amplifying cavity. Giving the both stable and unstable states, it is shown that the proposed model can describe the system nonlinear dynamics with an easier and more practical manner in comparison with the fully quantum-based models. Simulation results reveal that the instability in the system dynamical states can initiate in accordance with Ikeda map (as the universal map of instability in many optical systems) but does not progress accordingly. Instead, Duffing map and Henon map are recognized as the two characteristic maps of instability and chaos in the spaser system. More importantly, it is deduced that the SPs’ damping amplitude can be compensated if the feedback depth/nonlinear coefficient becomes as high/large as to induce chaotic regime in the transitional states between the two levels of QDs. A spaser with stimulated SPs can then be launched. Finally, an experimental evidence of a route to chaos is given in a nonlinear medium containing the flakes of reduced graphene oxide (RGO), dispersed inside a dielectric host to indicate the crucial role of feedback depth and nonlinearity. The proposed model can pave the way for designing the spaser systems in a practicable manner.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Photonic and Optical Devices · Quantum Information and Cryptography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Barnes WL, Dereux A, Ebbesen TW (2003) Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 424.6950:824–83010.1038/nature01937 ↗
2. Brongersma ML, Kik PG (2007) Surface plasmon nanophotonics, vol 131. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-1-4020-4333-8 ↗
3. Bocharov AA (2019) Tunable Goos-Hänchen shift of surface plasmon beam due to graphene in a metal-dielectric system. Plasmonics 14(1):173–17810.1007/s11468-018-0790-7 ↗
4. Xiao S et al (2016) Graphene-plasmon polaritons: From fundamental properties to potential applications. Front Phys 11.2:11780110.1007/s11467-016-0551-z ↗
5. Agrawal A, Cho SH, Zandi O, Ghosh S, Johns RW, Milliron DJ (2018) Localized surface plasmon resonance in semiconductor nanocrystals. Chem Rev 118(6):3121–320710.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00613 ↗
6. Jing J-Y, Wang Q, Zhao W-M, Wang B-T (2019) Long-range surface plasmon resonance and its sensing applications: a review. Opt Lasers Eng 112:103–11810.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.09.013 ↗
7. Lu H, Gan X, Mao D, Zhao J (2017) Graphene-supported manipulation of surface plasmon polaritons in metallic nanowaveguides. Photonics Res 5(3):162–16710.1364/PRJ.5.000162 ↗
8. Zhernovnykova OA, Popova OV, Deynychenko GV, Deynichenko TI, Bludov YV (2019) Surface plasmon-polaritons in graphene, embedded into medium with gain and losses. J Phys Condens Matter 31(46):46530110.1088/1361-648X/ab3821 ↗
9. Xu L et al (2019) Surface plasmon nanolaser: Principle, structure, characteristics and applications. Appl Sci 9.5:86110.3390/app9050861 ↗
10. Wang D, Wang W, Knudson MP, Schatz GC, Odom TW (2017) Structural engineering in plasmon nanolasers. Chem Rev 118(6):2865–288110.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00424 ↗
11. Chou Y-H et al (2018) Surface plasmon polariton nanolasers: coherent light sources for new applications. Chin Phys B 27(11):11420810.1088/1674-1056/27/11/114208 ↗
12. Azzam SI et al (2020) Ten years of spasers and plasmonic nanolasers. Light Sci Appl 9(1):1–2110.1038/s41377-020-0319-7 ↗
13. Ross BM, Lee LP (2008) Plasmon tuning and local field enhancement maximization of the nanocrescent. Nanotechnology 19(27):27520110.1088/0957-4484/19/27/275201 ↗
14. Fafin A, Camelio S, Pailloux F, Babonneau D (2019) Surface plasmon resonances and local field enhancement in aluminum nanoparticles embedded in silicon nitride. J Phys Chem C 123(22):13908–1391710.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03050 ↗
15. Premaratne M, Stockman MI (2017) Theory and technology of SPASERs. Adv Opt Photon 9(1):79–12810.1364/AOP.9.000079 ↗
16. Nechepurenko IA, Dorofeenko AV, Vinogradov AP, Nikitov SA (2017) Passively Q-switched spaser as a terahertz clock oscillator for plasmon computer. J Commun Technol Electron 62(11):1209–121510.1134/S1064226917100102 ↗
17. Galanzha EI et al (2017) Spaser as a biological probe. Nat Commun 8:1552810.1038/ncomms15528 ↗
18. Gao Z et al (2020) Spaser nanoparticles for ultranarrow bandwidth STED super-resolution imaging. Adv Mater 32.9:190723310.1002/adma.201907233 ↗
19. Kim K-H, Choe S-H (2017) Raman spaser in a plasmonic nanoantenna embedded with raman-active nanoparticle. Plasmonics 12(6):1897–190110.1007/s11468-016-0460-6 ↗
20. Ma R-M, Oulton RF (2019) Applications of nanolasers. Nat Nanotechnol 14(1):12–2210.1038/s41565-018-0320-y ↗
21. Jia H et al (2016) Analytical model for the excitation of leaky surface plasmon polaritons in the attenuated total reflection configuration. J Opt 18.5:05500310.1088/2040-8978/18/5/055003 ↗
22. Stockman MI (2010) The spaser as a nanoscale quantum generator and ultrafast amplifier. J Opt 12.2:02400410.1088/2040-8978/12/2/024004 ↗
23. Zhong X-L, Li Z-Y (2013) All-analytical semiclassical theory of spaser performance in a plasmonic nanocavity. Phys Rev B 88(8):08510110.1103/PhysRevB.88.085101 ↗
24. Baranov DG, Andrianov ES, Vinogradov AP, Lisyansky AA (2013) Exactly solvable toy model for surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation. Opt Express 21(9):10779–1079110.1364/OE.21.010779 ↗
25. Balykin VI (2018) From classical to quantum plasmonics: classical emitter and SPASER. AIP Conference Proceedings. vol 1936. no. 1. AIP Publishing LLC, Melville10.1063/1.5025448 ↗
26. Vallet A, Chusseau L, Philippe F, Jean-Marie A (2019) Markov model of quantum fluctuations at the transition to lasing of semiconductor nanolasers. Phys E Low-Dimensional Syst Nanostruct 105:97–10410.1016/j.physe.2018.08.028 ↗
27. Dorfman KE et al (2013) Quantum-coherence-enhanced surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation. Phys Rev Lett 111.4:04360110.1103/PhysRevLett.111.043601 ↗
28. Andrianov ES, Pukhov AA, Dorofeenko AV, Vinogradov AP, Lisyansky AA (2011) Forced synchronization of spaser by an external optical wave. Opt Express 19(25):24849–2485710.1364/OE.19.024849 ↗
29. Sadeghi SM, Wing WJ, Gutha RR (2015) Undamped ultrafast pulsation of plasmonic fields via coherent exciton-plasmon coupling. Nanotechnology 26(8):08520210.1088/0957-4484/26/8/085202 ↗
30. Shesterikov AV et al (2018) The method of surface plasmon-polariton pulses generation via cooperative effects in waveguide spaser. J Phys Conf Ser 951(1) IOP Publishing10.1088/1742-6596/951/1/012033 ↗
31. Alsing PM, Gavrielides R, Kovanis V (1994) Controlling unstable periodic orbits in a nonlinear optical system: the Ikeda map. Proceedings of 1994 Nonlinear optics: materials, Fundamentals and Applications IEEE
32. Arecchi FT, Giacomelli G, Ramazza PL, Residori S (1990) Experimental evidence of chaotic itinerancy and spatiotemporal chaos in optics. Phys Rev Lett 65(20):2531–253410.1103/PhysRevLett.65.2531 ↗
33. Zhao LM, Tang DY, Lin F, Zhao B (2004) Observation of period-doubling bifurcations in a femtosecond fiber soliton laser with dispersion management cavity. Opt Express 12(19):4573–457810.1364/OPEX.12.004573 ↗
34. Illing L, Gauthier DJ, Roy R (2007) Controlling optical chaos, spatio-temporal dynamics, and patterns. Adv At Mol Opt Phys 54:615–69710.1016/S1049-250X(06)54010-8 ↗
35. Larger L, Goedgebuer J-P, Udaltsov V (2004) Ikeda-based nonlinear delayed dynamics for application to secure optical transmission systems using chaos. C R Phys 5(6):669–68110.1016/j.crhy.2004.05.003 ↗
36. VanWiggeren GD, Roy R (1998) Optical communication with chaotic waveforms. Phys Rev Lett 81(16):3547–355010.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3547 ↗
37. Voronine DV, Huo W, Scully M (2014) Ultrafast dynamics of surface plasmon nanolasers with quantum coherence and external plasmonic feedback. J Opt 16(11):11401310.1088/2040-8978/16/11/114013 ↗
38. Sharif MA (2019) Spatio-temporal modulation instability of surface plasmon polaritons in graphene-dielectric heterostructure. Phys E Low-Dimensional Syst Nanostruct 105:174–18110.1016/j.physe.2018.09.011 ↗
39. Burov DA, Evstigneev NM, Magnitskii NA (2017) On the chaotic dynamics in two coupled partial differential equations for evolution of surface plasmon polaritons. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 46:26–3610.1016/j.cnsns.2016.10.012 ↗
40. Scalora M, Vincenti MA, de Ceglia D, Cojocaru CM, Grande M, Haus JW (2015) Nonlinear Duffing oscillator model for third harmonic generation. JOSA B 32(10):2129–213810.1364/JOSAB.32.002129 ↗
41. Duffing G (1918) Erzwungene Schwingungen bei veränderlicher Eigenfrequenz und ihre technische Bedeutung. No. 41–42. F. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig
42. Guckenheimer J, Holmes P (2013) Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields, vol 42. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
43. Holmes P, Rand D (1980) Phase portraits and bifurcations of the non-linear oscillator: ẍ+(α+ γx2+ βx+ δx3= 0. Int J Non-Linear Mech 15.6:449–45810.1016/0020-7462(80)90031-1 ↗
44. Balyakin AA, Ryskin NM (2004) A change in the character of modulation instability in the vicinity of a critical frequency. Tech Phys Lett 30(3):175–17710.1134/1.1707158 ↗
45. Savi MA, Pacheco PMCL (2002) Chaos in a two-degree of freedom Duffing oscillator. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 24(2):115–12110.1590/S0100-73862002000200006 ↗
46. Lenci S, Rega G (2003) Optimal control of nonregular dynamics in a Duffing oscillator. Nonlinear Dyn 33(1):71–8610.1023/A:1025509014101 ↗
47. Ibraheem A, Kumar N (2015) Attractors of Duffing map: application of DLI and 0-1 test. Int J Eng Innov Technol 4(10):2
48. Kovacic I, Brennan MJ (2011) The Duffing equation: nonlinear oscillators and their behaviour. Wiley, Hoboken10.1002/9780470977859 ↗
49. Sheu L-J et al (2007) Chaotic dynamics of the fractionally damped Duffing equation. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 32.4:1459–146810.1016/j.chaos.2005.11.066 ↗
50. Attia RAM, Lu D, Khater MMA (2019) Chaos and relativistic energy-momentum of the nonlinear time fractional Duffing equation. Math Comput Appl 24.1:10
51. Wen H (2014) A review of the Hénon map and its physical interpretations. School of Physics Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, pp 30332–30430
52. Elhadj Z, Sprott JC (2008) A two-dimensional discrete mapping with C∞ multifold chaotic attractors. EJTP 5(17):107–120
53. Sonis M (1996) Once more on Hénon map: analysis of bifurcations. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 7(12):2215–223410.1016/S0960-0779(96)00081-1 ↗
54. Hilgevoord J (1996) The uncertainty principle for energy and time. Am J Phys 64(12):1451–145610.1119/1.18410 ↗
55. Faraji M, Sharif MA, Borjkhani M, Ashabi K (2018) Period doubling and route to chaos in reduced graphene oxide, an experimental evidence. J Mol Liq 269:485–49110.1016/j.molliq.2018.08.084 ↗
56. Cheng J-L, Vermeulen N, Sipe JE (2014) Third order optical nonlinearity of graphene. New J Phys 16.5:05301410.1088/1367-2630/16/5/053014 ↗
57. Hendry E (2010) Et al. "Coherent nonlinear optical response of graphene.". Phys Rev Lett 105(9):09740110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.097401 ↗
58. Ciattoni A, Rizza C (2015) Graphene-nonlinearity unleashing at lasing threshold in graphene-assisted cavities. Phys Rev A 91(5):05383310.1103/PhysRevA.91.053833 ↗
59. Wu R, Zhang Y, Yan S, Bian F, Wang W, Bai X, Lu X, Zhao J, Wang E (2011) Purely coherent nonlinear optical response in solution dispersions of graphene sheets. Nano Lett 11(12):5159–516410.1021/nl2023405 ↗
60. Sharif MA, Majles Ara MH, Ghafary B, Salmani S, Mohajer S (2016) Experimental observation of low threshold optical bistability in exfoliated graphene with low oxidation degree. Opt Mater 53:80–8610.1016/j.optmat.2016.01.017 ↗
61. Shi H, Wang C, Sun Z, Zhou Y, Jin K, Redfern SAT, Yang G (2014) Tuning the nonlinear optical absorption of reduced graphene oxide by chemical reduction. Opt Express 22(16):19375–1938510.1364/OE.22.019375 ↗
62. Constant TJ, Hornett SM, Chang DE, Hendry E (2016) All-optical generation of surface plasmons in graphene. Nat Phys 12(2):124–12710.1038/nphys3545 ↗
63. Sharif MA, Khodavirdizadeh M, Salmani S, Mohajer S, Ara MHM (2019) Difference frequency generation-based ultralow threshold optical bistability in graphene at visible frequencies, an experimental realization. J Mol Liq 284:92–10110.1016/j.molliq.2019.03.167 ↗