Highly Sensitive Silver/Tin Selenide/Graphene Multilayer SPR Sensor for Hemoglobin and Glucose Levels Monitoring in Biological Fluids
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This work presents the simulation of a novel surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor composed of silver/tin-selenide/graphene. The designed sensor aims to detect biological constituents in various chemical and biological solutions. While simulation packages based on finite element methods (FEM) are typically utilized in engineering and physics for structural and fluid dynamics analyses, their application in medical diagnostics is less common. In this study, we employed a simple FEM simulation method for medical diagnostics. The functionality of the proposed FEM-based simulated biosensor is examined by testing it on hemoglobin and glucose samples of a diabetic person. In the blood samples analyzed, a 6.1025 g/l increase in hemoglobin (HB) level corresponded to a 0.001 refractive index unit (RIU) increment. The SPR sensor design presented in this work demonstrated a novel capability to detect such minute changes using a simple and cost-effective setup, achieving an angular sensitivity of 158 deg/RIU. Additionally, the SPR sensor was employed for detecting glucose concentrations in urine samples, offering a potential indicator for diabetes diagnosis. The novelty of this SPR sensor lies in its simple schematic design, enabling precise detection of both hemoglobin and glucose levels.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Hossain B, Paul AK, Islam MA, Rahman MM, Sarkar AK, Abdulrazak LF (2022) A highly sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensor using SnSe allotrope and heterostructure of BlueP/MoS2 for cancerous cell detection. Optik 252:16850610.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168506 ↗
2. Dai X, Liang Y, Zhao Y, Gan S, Jia Y, Xiang Y (2019) Sensitivity enhancement of a surface plasmon resonance with tin selenide (SnSe) allotropes. Sensors 19(1):17310.3390/s19010173 ↗
3. Bochenkov VE, Frederiksen M, Sutherland DS (2013) Enhanced refractive index sensitivity of elevated short-range ordered nanohole arrays in optically thin plasmonic Au films. Opt Express 21(12):14763–1477010.1364/OE.21.014763 ↗
4. Masson J-F (2017) Surface plasmon resonance clinical biosensors for medical diagnostics. ACS sensors 2(1):16–3010.1021/acssensors.6b00763 ↗
5. Xue T et al (2019) Ultrasensitive detection of miRNA with an antimonene-based surface plasmon resonance sensor. Nat Commun 10(1):1–910.1038/s41467-018-07947-8 ↗
6. Nguyen HH, Park J, Kang S, Kim M (2015) Surface plasmon resonance: a versatile technique for biosensor applications. Sensors 15(5):10481–1051010.3390/s150510481 ↗
7. Wang D et al (2019) Recent advances in surface plasmon resonance imaging sensors. Sensors 19(6):126610.3390/s19061266 ↗
8. Kumar R, Pal S, Verma A, Prajapati Y, Saini J (2020) Effect of silicon on sensitivity of SPR biosensor using hybrid nanostructure of black phosphorus and MXene. Superlattices Microstruct 145:10659110.1016/j.spmi.2020.106591 ↗
9. Song B, Li D, Qi W, Elstner M, Fan C, Fang H (2010) Graphene on Au (111): a highly conductive material with excellent adsorption properties for high-resolution bio/nanodetection and identification. ChemPhysChem 11(3):585–58910.1002/cphc.200900743 ↗
10. Artiles MS, Rout CS, Fisher TS (2011) Graphene-based hybrid materials and devices for biosensing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63(14–15):1352–136010.1016/j.addr.2011.07.005 ↗
11. Banerjee AN (2018) Graphene and its derivatives as biomedical materials: future prospects and challenges. Interface focus 8(3):2017005610.1098/rsfs.2017.0056 ↗
12. Lou J, Cheng T, Li S, Zhang X (2019) Surface plasmon resonance photonic crystal fiber biosensor based on gold-graphene layers. Opt Fiber Technol 50:206–21110.1016/j.yofte.2019.03.028 ↗
13. Gilbertson DT, Ebben JP, Foley RN, Weinhandl ED, Bradbury BD, Collins AJ (2008) Hemoglobin level variability: associations with mortality. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: CJASN 3(1):13310.2215/CJN.01610407 ↗
14. Drüeke TB et al (2006) Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia. N Engl J Med 355(20):2071–208410.1056/NEJMoa062276 ↗
15. Islam MR, Moinuddin M, Ahmed A, Rahman SM (2021) Association of sickle cell disease with anthropometric indices among under-five children: evidence from 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. BMC Med 19(1):1–1110.1186/s12916-020-01879-1 ↗
16. Ajad AK, Islam MJ, Kaysir MR, Atai J (2021) Highly sensitive bio sensor based on WGM ring resonator for hemoglobin detection in blood samples. Optik 226:16600910.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166009 ↗
17. Jouven X, Lemaître RN, Rea TD, Sotoodehnia N, Empana J-P, Siscovick DS (2005) Diabetes, glucose level, and risk of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J 26(20):2142–214710.1093/eurheartj/ehi376 ↗
18. Mishra S, Tiwari P, Yadav R, Patel PS (2024) An extensive analysis of diseases associated with diabetes. Journal of Pharma Insights and Research 2(3):174–18710.69613/ng1j7s13 ↗
19. Sani MH, Khosroabadi S (2020) A novel design and analysis of high-sensitivity biosensor based on nano-cavity for detection of blood component, diabetes, cancer and glucose concentration. IEEE Sens J 20(13):7161–716810.1109/JSEN.2020.2964114 ↗
20. Rahman MM, Rana MM, Rahman MS, Anower M, Mollah MA, Paul AK (2020) Sensitivity enhancement of SPR biosensors employing heterostructure of PtSe2 and 2D materials. Opt Mater 107:11012310.1016/j.optmat.2020.110123 ↗
21. Akib TBA et al (2021) Design and numerical analysis of a graphene-coated SPR biosensor for rapid detection of the novel coronavirus. Sensors 21(10):349110.3390/s21103491 ↗
22. Ouyang Q et al (2016) Sensitivity enhancement of transition metal dichalcogenides/silicon nanostructure-based surface plasmon resonance biosensor. Sci Rep 6(1):2819010.1038/srep28190 ↗
23. Rahman MS, Rikta K, Abdulrazak LF, Anower MS (2020) Enhanced performance of SnSe-Graphene hybrid photonic surface plasmon refractive sensor for biosensing applications. Photonics Nanostructures-Fundam Appl 39:10077910.1016/j.photonics.2020.100779 ↗
24. Bruna M, Borini S (2009) Optical constants of graphene layers in the visible range. Appl Phys Lett 94(3)10.1063/1.3073717 ↗
25. Shalabney A, Abdulhalim I (2011) Sensitivity-enhancement methods for surface plasmon sensors. Laser Photonics Rev 5(4):571–60610.1002/lpor.201000009 ↗
26. Kim S-H, Koh K (2006) Functional dyes for surface plasmon resonance-based sensing system. Functional Dyes: Elsevier, pp. 185–21310.1016/B978-044452176-7/50006-1 ↗
27. Maurya J, Prajapati Y, Singh V, Saini J, Tripathi R (2015) Performance of graphene–MoS 2 based surface plasmon resonance sensor using silicon layer. Opt Quant Electron 47(11):3599–361110.1007/s11082-015-0233-z ↗
28. Dey B, Islam MS, Park J (2021) Numerical design of high-performance WS2/metal/WS2/graphene heterostructure based surface plasmon resonance refractive index sensor. Results in Physics 23:10402110.1016/j.rinp.2021.104021 ↗
29. Maurya JB, François A, Prajapati YK (2018) Two-dimensional layered nanomaterial-based one-dimensional photonic crystal refractive index sensor. Sensors 18(3):85710.3390/s18030857 ↗
30. Zeng S et al (2015) Graphene–MoS2 hybrid nanostructures enhanced surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Sens Actuators B Chem 207:801–81010.1016/j.snb.2014.10.124 ↗
31. Karki B, Sarkar P, Dhiman G, Srivastava G, Kumar M (2024) Platinum diselenide and graphene-based refractive index sensor for cancer detection. Plasmonics 19(2):953–96210.1007/s11468-023-02051-0 ↗
32. Karki B, Trabelsi Y, Uniyal A, Pal A (2022) Zinc sulfide, silicon dioxide, and black phosphorus based ultra-sensitive surface plasmon biosensor. Opt Quant Electron 54(2):10710.1007/s11082-021-03480-z ↗
33. Karki B, Trabelsi Y, Sarkar P, Pal A, Uniyal A (2024) Tuning sensitivity of surface plasmon resonance gas sensor based on multilayer black phosphorous. Mod Phys Lett B 14:245036410.1142/S0217984924503640 ↗
34. Karki B, Pal A, Sarkar P, Yadav RB, Muduli A, Trabelsi Y (2024) ZnO-silicon enhanced surface plasmon resonance sensor for chemical sensing. SILICON 4:1–2
35. Karki B, Trabelsi Y, Uniyal A, Pal A, Bharos YR (2024) Detection of fat concentration milk using TMDC-based surface plasmon resonance sensor. Mod Phys Lett B 12:245025310.1142/S0217984924502531 ↗
36. Karki B, Pal A, Sarkar P, Uniyal A, Yadav RB (2024) Gold, MXene, and graphene nanofilm-based surface plasmon resonance sensor for malaria detection. J Opt 18:1–2
37. Karki B, Trabelsi Y, Pal A, Taya SA, Yadav RB (2024) Direct detection of dopamine using zinc oxide nanowire-based surface plasmon resonance sensor. Opt Mater 1(147):11455510.1016/j.optmat.2023.114555 ↗
38. Karki B, Uniyal A, Sarkar P, Pal A, Yadav RB (2023) Sensitivity improvement of surface plasmon resonance sensor for glucose detection in urine samples using heterogeneous layers: an analytical perspective. J Opt 16:1–110.1016/j.optom.2022.12.001 ↗