High Sensitivity of Metasurface-Based Five-Band Terahertz Absorber
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, we present a simple design of a sensing scheme based on a plasmonic metamaterial absorber operating at THz frequencies. The unit cell of the designed structure consists of a gold (Au) cross-bar-patch structure, and a polyimide dielectric spacing layer located on an Au grounded plane. Simulations are carried out using the finite element method and subsequently validated through the calculation using the interference model. We discuss optimized designs that enable the achievement of five resonance modes and high sensitivity. The mechanism of absorptance spectrum is studied, revealing that the coupling effect between the Au cross bars of the metasurface and the sandwiched Au ground surface, separated by a polyimide dielectric spacer, gives rise to the five absorptance modes. The analysis of localized surface plasmon resonance modes are conducted through examination of electric field distributions and surface current density streamlines. Furthermore, the impact of various geometry parameters of the top Au crossbar layer on the resonance frequencies is explored. This work makes a significant contribution to the design of a straightforward plasmonic metamaterial absorber based on a metasurface, which exhibits five distinct absorption bands ranging from 0.4 to 3.2 THz. The calculated refractive index sensitivity and the figure of merit (S (THz/RIU), FOM (RIU−1)) for five resonance frequency modes are (2.00, 1.67), (14.00, 140.00), (14.00, 28.00) (14.00, 11.67), and (12.00, 10.00), respectively. The designed plasmonic device offers valuable insights for future developments in metamaterial absorber-based devices, particularly in the fields of THz nanophotonic applications.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (94)
Show source-provided references
1. Appasani B (2021) Temperature tunable seven band terahertz metamaterial absorber using slotted flower–shaped resonator on an InSb substrate. Plasmonics 16:833–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-020-01329-x10.1007/s11468-020-01329-x ↗
2. Appasani B (2022) A hybrid terahertz metamaterial sensor using a hexagonal ring resonator with bio-medical applications. Plasmonics 17:519–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-021-01546-y10.1007/s11468-021-01546-y ↗
3. Niu Q, Tang C, He Y, Hu L, Wang BX (2019) Design of multiple-band filtering resonance devices at narrow frequency range using terahertz metamaterial resonator. Opt Commun 453:124368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2019.12436810.1016/j.optcom.2019.124368 ↗
4. Ma S, Wen S, Mi X, Zhao H, Zhao J (2023) Bifunctional terahertz sensor based on tunable graphene metamaterial absorber. Opt Commun 532:129254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2022.12925410.1016/j.optcom.2022.129254 ↗
5. Shen L, Yang TJ, Chau YF (2007) 50∕50 beam splitter using a one-dimensional metal photonic crystal with parabolalike dispersion. Appl Phys Lett 90. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.275038510.1063/1.2750385 ↗
6. Shen L, Yang TJ, Chau YF (2008) Effect of internal period on the optical dispersion of indefinite-medium materials. Phys Rev B 77:205124. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.20512410.1103/PhysRevB.77.205124 ↗
7. Ri KJ, Kim JS, Kim JH, Ri CH (2023) Tunable triple-broadband terahertz metamaterial absorber using a single VO2 circular ring. Opt Commun 542:129573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2023.12957310.1016/j.optcom.2023.129573 ↗
8. Ri KJ, Ri CH (2023) Tunable dual-broadband terahertz metamaterial absorber based on a simple design of slotted VO2 resonator. Opt Commun 536:129377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2023.12937710.1016/j.optcom.2023.129377 ↗
9. Rengasamy S, Natarajan R, Kuttathati Srinivasan V (2023) A Miniaturized penta-band metamaterial THz absorber for sensing and imaging applications. Plasmonics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-01914-w10.1007/s11468-023-01914-w ↗
10. Gu L, Zhang X, Liu H, Wei Z, Guo J (2023) Dynamic relationship between plasmonic metasurface geometric parameters and transmission spectrum: a new perspective based on multifractal analysis and prediction. Plasmonics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-01871-410.1007/s11468-023-01871-4 ↗
11. Huang Q, Wang G, Zhou M, Zheng J, Tang S, Ji G (2021) Metamaterial electromagnetic wave absorbers and devices: design and 3D microarchitecture. J Mater Sci Technol 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.07.05510.1016/j.jmst.2021.07.055 ↗
12. La Spada L (2016) Metamaterial-based wideband electromagnetic wave absorber. Opt Express 24:5763. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.00576310.1364/OE.24.005763 ↗
13. Hossain MJ, Rahman MH, Faruque MRI (1882) An innovative polarisation-insensitive perfect metamaterial absorber with an octagonal-shaped resonator for energy harvesting at visible spectra. Nanomaterials 2023:13
14. Chou Chau YF, Jiang JC, Chou Chao CT, Chiang HP, Lim CM (2016) Manipulating near field enhancement and optical spectrum in a pair-array of the cavity resonance based plasmonic nanoantennas. J Phys D Appl Phys 49:475102. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/49/47/47510210.1088/0022-3727/49/47/475102 ↗
15. Tathfif I, Hassan MF, Rashid KS, Yaseer AA, Sagor RH (2022) A highly sensitive plasmonic refractive index sensor based on concentric triple ring resonator for cancer biomarker and chemical concentration detection. Opt Commun 519:128429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2022.12842910.1016/j.optcom.2022.128429 ↗
16. Tathfif I, Yaseer AA, Rashid KS, Sagor RH (2021) Metal-insulator-metal waveguide-based optical pressure sensor embedded with arrays of silver nanorods. Opt Express 29:32365–32376. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.43997410.1364/OE.439974 ↗
17. Tathfif I, Rashid KS, Yaseer AA, Sagor RH (2021) Alternative material titanium nitride based refractive index sensor embedded with defects: an emerging solution in sensing arena. Res Phys 29:104795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.10479510.1016/j.rinp.2021.104795 ↗
18. Rashid KS, Tathfif I, Yaseer AA, Hassan MF, Sagor RH (2021) Cog-shaped refractive index sensor embedded with gold nanorods for temperature sensing of multiple analytes. Opt Express 29:37541–37554. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.44295410.1364/OE.442954 ↗
19. Rashid KS, Hassan MF, Yaseer AA, Tathfif I, Sagor RH (2021) Gas-sensing and label-free detection of biomaterials employing multiple rings structured plasmonic nanosensor. Sens Bio-Sens Res 33:100440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2021.10044010.1016/j.sbsr.2021.100440 ↗
20. Hassan MF, Tathfif I, Radoan M, Sagor RH (2020) A concentric double-ring resonator based plasmonic refractive index sensor with glucose sensing capability. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE (TENCON), 16–19 Nov. 2020, pp. 91–9610.1109/TENCON50793.2020.9293901 ↗
21. Hassan MF, Sagor RH, Tathfif I, Rashid KS, Radoan M (2021) An optimized dielectric-metal-dielectric refractive index nanosensor. IEEE Sens J 21:1461–1469. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.301657010.1109/JSEN.2020.3016570 ↗
22. Wang B-X, Xu C, Duan G, Xu W, Pi F (2023) Review of broadband metamaterial absorbers: from principles, design strategies, and tunable properties to functional applications. Adv Funct Mater 33:2213818. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20221381810.1002/adfm.202213818 ↗
23. Yu P, Besteiro LV, Huang Y, Wu J, Fu L, Tan HH, Jagadish C, Wiederrecht GP, Govorov AO, Wang Z (2019) Broadband metamaterial absorbers. Adv Funct Mater 7:1800995. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.20180099510.1002/adom.201800995 ↗
24. Xu R-J, Lin Y-S (2022) Actively MEMS-based tunable metamaterials for advanced and emerging applications. Electronics 11:24310.3390/electronics11020243 ↗
25. Ali A, Mitra A, Aïssa B (2022) Metamaterials and metasurfaces: a review from the perspectives of materials, mechanisms and advanced metadevices. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1206102710.3390/nano12061027 ↗
26. Komiyama S (2011) Single-photon detectors in the terahertz range. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 17:54–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2010.204889310.1109/JSTQE.2010.2048893 ↗
27. Federici JF, Schulkin B, Huang F, Gary D, Barat R, Oliveira F, Zimdars D (2005) THz imaging and sensing for security applications—explosives, weapons and drugs. Semicond Sci Technol 20:S266. https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/20/7/01810.1088/0268-1242/20/7/018 ↗
28. Fekete L, Kužel P, Němec H, Kadlec F, Dejneka A, Stuchlík J, Fejfar A (2009) Ultrafast carrier dynamics in microcrystalline silicon probed by time-resolved terahertz spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 79. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.11530610.1103/PhysRevB.79.115306 ↗
29. Jepsen PU, Cooke DG, Koch M (2011) Terahertz spectroscopy and imaging — modern techniques and applications. Laser Photon Rev 5:124–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.20100001110.1002/lpor.201000011 ↗
30. Lin J-M, Chau Y-F (1995) Radome slope compensation using multiple-model Kalman filters. J Guid Control Dyn 18:637–640. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.2143810.2514/3.21438 ↗
31. Wilbert D, Hokmabadi M, Martinez J, Kung P, Kim S (2013) Terahertz metamaterials perfect absorbers for sensing and imaging 8585. SPIE10.1117/12.2005709 ↗
32. Kung P, Kim S (2013) Terahertz metamaterial absorbers for sensing and imaging. Prog Electromagn Res Symposium 232–235
33. Leitenstorfer A, Moskalenko AS, Kampfrath T, Kono J, Castro-Camus E, Peng K, Qureshi N, Turchinovich D, Tanaka K, Markelz AG et al (2023) The 2023 terahertz science and technology roadmap. J Phys D Appl Phys 56:223001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/acbe4c10.1088/1361-6463/acbe4c ↗
34. Landy NI, Sajuyigbe S, Mock JJ, Smith DR, Padilla W (2008) Perfect metamaterial absorber. Phys Rev Lett 100:207402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.20740210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.207402 ↗
35. Pelluri R, Appasani B (2017) Genetic algorithm optimized X-band absorber using metamaterials. Progress Electromagn Res Lett 69:59–6410.2528/PIERL17051902 ↗
36. Tuong PV, Lam VD, Park JW, Choi EH, Nikitov SA, Lee YP (2013) Perfect-absorber metamaterial based on flower-shaped structure. Photonics Nanostruct Fundam Appl 11:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.photonics.2012.09.00210.1016/j.photonics.2012.09.002 ↗
37. Abdulkarim Y, Mohanty A, Acharya O, Appasani B, Khan MS, Mohapatra SK, Muhammadsharif F, Dong J (2022) A review on metamaterial absorbers: microwave to optical. Front Phys 10:893791. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.89379110.3389/fphy.2022.893791 ↗
38. Wang B-X (2016) Quad-band terahertz metamaterial absorber based on the combining of the dipole and quadrupole resonances of two SRRs. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 23:1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.254732510.1109/JSTQE.2016.2547325 ↗
39. Yen TJ, Padilla WJ, Fang N, Vier DC, Smith DR, Pendry JB, Basov DN, Zhang X (2004) Terahertz magnetic response from artificial materials. Science 303:1494–1496. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.109402510.1126/science.1094025 ↗
40. Chen H-T (2012) Interference theory of metamaterial perfect absorbers. Opt Express 20:7165–7172. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.00716510.1364/OE.20.007165 ↗
41. Tao H, Bingham CM, Pilon D, Fan K, Strikwerda AC, Shrekenhamer D, Padilla WJ, Zhang X, Averitt RD (2010) A dual band terahertz metamaterial absorber. J Phys D Appl Phys 43:225102. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/43/22/22510210.1088/0022-3727/43/22/225102 ↗
42. Shan Y, Chen L, Shi C, Cheng Z, Zang X, Xu B, Zhu Y (2015) Ultrathin flexible dual band terahertz absorber. Optics Communications 350:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2015.03.07210.1016/j.optcom.2015.03.072 ↗
43. Shen X, Yang Y, Zang Y, Gu J, Han J, Zhang W, Jun Cui T (2012) Triple-band terahertz metamaterial absorber: design, experiment, and physical interpretation. Appl Phys Lett 101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.475787910.1063/1.4757879 ↗
44. Liu S, Zhuge J, Ma S, Chen H, Bao D, He Q, Zhou L, Cui TJ (2015) A bi-layered quad-band metamaterial absorber at terahertz frequencies. J Appl Phys 118. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493811010.1063/1.4938110 ↗
45. Wang B-X, Duan G, Xu C, Jiang J, Xu W, Pi F (2023) Design of multiple-frequency-band terahertz metamaterial absorbers with adjustable absorption peaks using toothed resonator. Mater Des 225:111586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11158610.1016/j.matdes.2023.111586 ↗
46. Mazare AG, Abdulkarim YI, Karim AS, Bakır M, Taouzari M, Muhammadsharif FF, Appasani B, Altıntaş O, Karaaslan M, Bizon N (2022) Enhanced sensing capacity of terahertz triple-band metamaterials absorber based on pythagorean fractal feometry. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1518636410.3390/ma15186364 ↗
47. Shchegolkov DY, Azad AK, O’Hara JF, Simakov EI (2010) Perfect subwavelength fishnetlike metamaterial-based film terahertz absorbers. Phys Rev B 82:205117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.20511710.1103/PhysRevB.82.205117 ↗
48. Liao Y-L, Zhao Y (2020) Ultra-narrowband dielectric metamaterial absorber for sensing based on cavity-coupled phase resonance. Result Phys 17:103072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.10307210.1016/j.rinp.2020.103072 ↗
49. Liu Z, Guo L, Zhang Q (2020) Design of dual-band terahertz perfect metamaterial absorber based on circuit theory. Molecules 25:410410.3390/molecules25184104 ↗
50. Shen X, Cui TJ, Zhao J, Ma HF, Jiang WX, Li H (2011) Polarization-independent wide-angle triple-band metamaterial absorber. Opt Express 19:9401–9407. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.00940110.1364/OE.19.009401 ↗
51. Wang B-X, Xie Q, Dong G, Huang W-Q (2018) Design of triple-band polarization controlled terahertz metamaterial absorber. Superlattices Microstruct 114:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2017.12.04210.1016/j.spmi.2017.12.042 ↗
52. Zhang B, Qi Y, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Liu W, Wang L, Ding J, Wang X, Yi Z (2021) Tunable multi-band terahertz absorber based on composite graphene structures with square ring and Jerusalem cross. Results Phys 25:104233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.10423310.1016/j.rinp.2021.104233 ↗
53. Grant JP, McCrindle IJ, Cumming DR (2012) Simulation, fabrication and characterization of THz metamaterial absorbers. J Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/5011410.3791/50114 ↗
54. Zou H, Cheng Y (2019) Design of a six-band terahertz metamaterial absorber for temperature sensing application. Opt Mater 88:674–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.01.00210.1016/j.optmat.2019.01.002 ↗
55. Zanjani MS, Chaharmahali I, Biabanifard S, Hosseini SE (2019) A reconfigurable multi-band, multi-bias THz absorber. Optik 191:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.05.09410.1016/j.ijleo.2019.05.094 ↗
56. Chen X, Su W, Geng Z, Meng Z, Wu H (2022) A multi-band terahertz plasmonic absorber based on fan-like metasurface. Optik 267:169701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.16970110.1016/j.ijleo.2022.169701 ↗
57. Zhu X, Wang B (2022) Absorption enhancement in terahertz region by cross-shaped grating. Opt Mater 133:112958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2022.11295810.1016/j.optmat.2022.112958 ↗
58. Yang Z, Zhou Q, Long W, Li C, Shi Y, Wu A, Liu J, Zhang C (2016) Study of asymmetric U-shaped resonator at terahertz frequencies. Opt Commun 368:119–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2016.01.08710.1016/j.optcom.2016.01.087 ↗
59. Lu T, Qiu P, Lian J, Zhang D, Zhuang S (2019) Ultrathin and broadband highly efficient terahertz reflective polarization converter based on four L-shaped metamaterials. Opt Mater 95:109230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.10923010.1016/j.optmat.2019.109230 ↗
60. Mohanty A, Acharya OP, Appasani B, Mohapatra SK (2018) A multi-band terahertz metamaterial absorber based on a Π and U-shaped structure. Photonics Nanostruct Fundam Appl 32:74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.photonics.2018.10.00810.1016/j.photonics.2018.10.008 ↗
61. Soheilifar MR (2019) The wideband optical absorber based on plasmonic metamaterials for optical sensing. Optik 182:702–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.01.09010.1016/j.ijleo.2019.01.090 ↗
62. Rufangura P, Sabah C (2016) Wide-band polarization independent perfect metamaterial absorber based on concentric rings topology for solar cells application. J Alloys Comp 680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.16210.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.162 ↗
63. Gong C, Zhan M, Yang J, Wang Z, Liu H, Zhao Y, Liu W (2016) Broadband terahertz metamaterial absorber based on sectional asymmetric structures. Sci Rep 6:32466. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3246610.1038/srep32466 ↗
64. Ren Z, Lin Z, Zhi X, Li M (2020) Double-layer broadband perfect metamaterial absorber and its potential for refractive index sensing. Opt Mater 99:109575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.10957510.1016/j.optmat.2019.109575 ↗
65. Sbeah ZA, Adhikari R, Sorathiya V, Chauhan D, Chang SH, Dwivedi RP (2023) A review on metamaterial sensors based on active plasmonic materials. Plasmonics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-01904-y10.1007/s11468-023-01904-y ↗
66. Chou Chao C-T, Chen S-H, Huang HJ, Chou Chau Y-F (2023) Near- and mid-infrared quintuple-band plasmonic metamaterial absorber. Plasmonics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-01881-210.1007/s11468-023-01881-2 ↗
67. Hakim ML, Islam MT, Alam T, Abdul Rahim SK, Bais B, Islam MS, Soliman MS (2023) Triple-band square split-ring resonator metamaterial absorber design with high effective medium ratio for 5G sub-6 GHz applications. Nanomaterials 13:22210.3390/nano13020222 ↗
68. Islam MR, Islam MT, Soliman MS, Baharuddin MH, Mat K, Moubark AM, Almalki SHA (2021) Metamaterial based on an inverse double V loaded complementary square split ring resonator for radar and Wi-Fi applications. Sci Rep 11:21782. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01275-610.1038/s41598-021-01275-6 ↗
69. Xu W, Xie L, Ying Y (2017) Mechanisms and applications of terahertz metamaterial sensing: a review. Nanoscale 9. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR03824K10.1039/C7NR03824K ↗
70. Ashalley E, Ma C-P, Zhu Y-S, Xu H-X, Yu P, Wang Z-M (2021) Recent progress in chiral absorptive metamaterials. J Electron Sci Technol 19:100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlest.2021.10009810.1016/j.jnlest.2021.100098 ↗
71. Li X, Li Q, Wu L, Xu Z, Yao J (2023) Focusing on the development and current status of metamaterial absorber by bibliometric analysis. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1606228610.3390/ma16062286 ↗
72. Chao C-TC, Kooh MRR, Lim CM, Thotagamuge R, Mahadi AH, Chau Y-FC (2023) Visible-range multiple-channel metal-shell rod-shaped narrowband plasmonic metamaterial absorber for refractive index and temperature sensing. Micromachines 14:34010.3390/mi14020340 ↗
73. Dial O, Cheng C, Scherer A (1998) Fabrication of high-density nanostructures by electron beam lithography. Journal of vacuum science and technology. B, Microelectronics and nanometer structures: processing, measurement, and phenomena: an official journal of the American Vacuum Society 16. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.59042810.1116/1.590428 ↗
74. Howell ST, Grushina A, Holzner F, Brugger J (2020) Thermal scanning probe lithography—a review. Microsyst Nanoeng 6:21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-019-0124-810.1038/s41378-019-0124-8 ↗
75. Ma Y, Chen Q, Grant J, Saha SC, Khalid A, Cumming DRS (2011) A terahertz polarization insensitive dual band metamaterial absorber. Opt Lett 36:945–947. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.00094510.1364/OL.36.000945 ↗
76. Huang L, Chowdhury DR, Ramani S, Reiten MT, Luo S-N, Taylor AJ, Chen H-T (2012) Experimental demonstration of terahertz metamaterial absorbers with a broad and flat high absorption band. Opt Lett 37:154–156. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.00015410.1364/OL.37.000154 ↗
77. Zhou J, Liu Z, Liu X, Fu G, Liu G, Chen J, Wang C, Zhang H, Hong M (2020) Metamaterial and nanomaterial electromagnetic wave absorbers: structures, properties and applications. J Journal of Materials Chemistry C 8:12768–1279410.1039/D0TC01990A ↗
78. Holloway CL, Dienstfrey A, Kuester EF, O’Hara JF, Azad AK, Taylor AJ (2009) A discussion on the interpretation and characterization of metafilms/metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalent of metamaterials. Metamaterials 3:100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metmat.2009.08.00110.1016/j.metmat.2009.08.001 ↗
79. Venkatachalam S, Zeranska-Chudek K, Zdrojek M, Hourlier D (2020) Carbon-based terahertz absorbers: materials, applications, and perspectives. Nano Select 1:471–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/nano.20200006710.1002/nano.202000067 ↗
80. Liu N, Mesch M, Weiss T, Hentschel M, Giessen H (2010) Infrared perfect absorber and its application as plasmonic sensor. Nano Lett 10:2342–2348. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl904103310.1021/nl9041033 ↗
81. Cheng F, Yang X, Gao J (2014) Enhancing intensity and refractive index sensing capability with infrared plasmonic perfect absorbers. Opt Lett 39:3185–3188. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.00318510.1364/OL.39.003185 ↗
82. Wang B, Yu P, Wang W, Zhang X, Kuo H-C, Xu H, Wang ZM (2021) High-Q plasmonic resonances: fundamentals and applications. Adv Optical Mater 9:2001520. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.20200152010.1002/adom.202001520 ↗
83. Wang Q, Guo J, Ding Z, Qi D, Jiang J, Wang Z, Chen W, Xiang YJ, Zhang W, Wee A (2017) Fabry-Perot cavity-enhanced optical absorption in ultrasensitive tunable photodiodes based on hybrid 2D materials. Nano Lett 17. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0357910.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03579 ↗
84. Chau Y-FC, Chao C-TC, Chiang H-P, Lim CM, Voo NY, Mahadi AH (2018) Plasmonic effects in composite metal nanostructures for sensing applications. J Nanopart Res 20:190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4293-410.1007/s11051-018-4293-4 ↗
85. Kyoung J (2020) Anomalous blueshift of aperture resonance enabled by the loss of a thin film. Sci Rep 10:22100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79224-y10.1038/s41598-020-79224-y ↗
86. Chau Y-FC, Chao CTC, Huang HJ, Wang Y-C, Chiang H-P, Idris, M.N.S.i.M., Masri, Z., Lim, C.M. (2019) Strong and tunable plasmonic field coupling and enhancement generating from the protruded metal nanorods and dielectric cores. Results Phys 13:102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2019.10229010.1016/j.rinp.2019.102290 ↗
87. Janneh M, De Marcellis A, Palange E, Tenggara AT, Byun D (2018) Design of a metasurface-based dual-band Terahertz perfect absorber with very high Q-factors for sensing applications. Optics Communications 416:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2018.02.01310.1016/j.optcom.2018.02.013 ↗
88. Banerjee S, Dutta P, Basu S, Mishra SK, Appasani B, Nanda S, Abdulkarim YI, Muhammadsharif FF, Dong J, Jha AV et al (2023) A new design of a terahertz metamaterial absorber for gas sensing applications. Symmetry 15:2410.3390/sym15010024 ↗
89. Hu D, Meng T, Wang H, Ma Y, Zhu Q (2020) Ultra-narrow-band terahertz perfect metamaterial absorber for refractive index sensing application. Results Phys 19:103567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.10356710.1016/j.rinp.2020.103567 ↗
90. Bilal RMH, Baqir MA, Choudhury PK, Ali MM, Rahim AA (2020) On the specially designed fractal metasurface-based dual-polarization converter in the THz regime. Results Phys 19:103358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.10335810.1016/j.rinp.2020.103358 ↗
91. Agarwal P, Kishor K, Sinha RK (2022) Ultrasensitive dual-band terahertz metasurface sensor based on all InSb resonator. Opt Commun 522:128667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2022.12866710.1016/j.optcom.2022.128667 ↗
92. Xue Y-Y, Li J-S (2023) Terahertz all-dielectric metasurface sensor based on quasi-bound states in the continuum. Appl Opt 62:1610–1615. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.48078310.1364/AO.480783 ↗
93. Hu H, Cui Z, Yue L, Wang X, Yang C, Zhang K, Wang Y (2022) A silicon-based metasurface for terahertz sensing. Optics Commun 506:127572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2021.12757210.1016/j.optcom.2021.127572 ↗
94. Wang Y, Zhang X, Zhou T, Zhu Y, Cui Z, Zhang K (2021) Properties and sensing performance of THz metasurface based on carbon nanotube and microfluidic channel. Front Phys 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.74950110.3389/fphy.2021.749501 ↗